Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Negative 92,000 Jobs Feb 2026
Negative 92,000 Jobs Feb 2026
By Johnny You
6 Mar 2026 11:26 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 Mar 2026 3:48 am
You will be erased from your family tree. Your descendants will be embarrassed of your participation in the demise of America.
Your epissfanny is getting blown by the winds in your face.
Five by Five.. Over and Out.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
12 Mar 2026 6:56 am
The employment numbers are negative, JuCo...
That's "nobueno"...
12 Mar 2026 7:05 am
The latest confirmed data shows the unemployment rate is 4.4%, not below zero. That’s from the February 2026 jobs report.
Unemployment can’t go negative.
Negative unemployment would mean more than 100% of people have jobs. Physics breaks before that happens.
The actual number is 4.4%.
That’s an increase, not a collapse. February payrolls fell by 92,000, pushing unemployment from 4.3% → 4.4%. Employment dropped, unemployment rose — but nothing is “negative.” The only negative numbers are the job losses, not the unemployment rate.
U really are clueless...your math skills are embarrassing
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 7:26 am
Non farm payrolls are a NOMINAL count, you **** idiot.MR-7 » 12 Mar 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ The latest confirmed data shows the unemployment rate is 4.4%, not below zero. That’s from the February 2026 jobs report.
Unemployment can’t go negative.
Negative unemployment would mean more than 100% of people have jobs. Physics breaks before that happens.
The actual number is 4.4%.
That’s an increase, not a collapse. February payrolls fell by 92,000, pushing unemployment from 4.3% → 4.4%. Employment dropped, unemployment rose — but nothing is “negative.” The only negative numbers are the job losses, not the unemployment rate.
U really are clueless...your math skills are embarrassing
12 Mar 2026 7:30 am
“Non‑farm payrolls are a nominal count.” And? It has nothing to do with the point, nothing to do with unemployment rates, and nothing to do with the claim you were trying to defend Slack-Jaw.Blackvegetable » 12 Mar 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ Non farm payrolls are a NOMINAL count, you **** idiot.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 7:34 am
Post the thread title, Stupid ****.MR-7 » 12 Mar 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ “Non‑farm payrolls are a nominal count.” And? It has nothing to do with the point, nothing to do with unemployment rates, and nothing to do with the claim you were trying to defend Slack-Jaw.
12 Mar 2026 7:49 am
Why? My response was to your IDIOTIC reply of, "The employment numbers are negative, JuCo..."
Here, I will break it down for you again....
February payrolls fell by 92,000, pushing unemployment from 4.3% → 4.4%. Employment dropped, unemployment rose — but nothing is “negative.” The only negative numbers are the job losses, not the unemployment rate.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 7:52 am
12 Mar 2026 7:57 am
“Non‑farm payrolls are a nominal count.” And? It has nothing to do with the point, nothing to do with unemployment rates, and nothing to do with the claim you were trying to defend Slack-Jaw.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 8:20 am
Post the thread title.MR-7 » 12 Mar 2026, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ “Non‑farm payrolls are a nominal count.” And? It has nothing to do with the point, nothing to do with unemployment rates, and nothing to do with the claim you were trying to defend Slack-Jaw.
12 Mar 2026 8:23 am
I accept your surrender
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 8:29 am
I don't see the thread title.
12 Mar 2026 8:33 am
This is all you need to see Behnchod.
viewtopic.php?p=2866075#p2866075
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 8:34 am
What we need to see is the thread title.MR-7 » 12 Mar 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ This is all you need to see Behnchod.
viewtopic.php?p=2866075#p2866075
12 Mar 2026 11:07 am
Blackvegetable » 12 Mar 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ Non farm payrolls are a NOMINAL count, you **** idiot.
plugs counted federal hires which don’t add to the gdp
12 Mar 2026 11:10 am
Excellent Buck. As usual, facts, just facts.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
12 Mar 2026 11:13 am
They are included in non-farm payroll.
If they "don't add to gdp" why does @conservativewave argue that the gubmint shutdown is the reason the most recent gdp report sucked...
You.people are so **** g'ddammned stupid
12 Mar 2026 11:39 am
Not being recognized while living really doesn't matter to anyone threatened to be erased from history. That is serenity of knowing why one exists since biologically added to the species for the time they are or were alive s conceived.Johnny You » 12 Mar 2026, 3:48 am » wrote: ↑ You will be erased from your family tree. Your descendants will be embarrassed of your participation in the demise of America.
Your epissfanny is getting blown by the winds in your face.
Five by Five.. Over and Out.
I see you never took the time to understand the evolving process in real time inhabiting space now. Your nurtured mind never wanted to understand more than rational relative time logistics.
12 Mar 2026 12:10 pm
Is par for your golf course Sole.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
12 Mar 2026 2:42 pm
What is par? average time lived since conception.st googled this info.
Global life expectancy in 2025 is projected to be approximately 73.5 years, a slight increase of 0.23% over 2024, continuing a post-pandemic recovery trend. The U.S. is experiencing record-high life expectancy, estimated to reach 79–79.
Who is online
In total there are 5166 users online :: 3 registered, 16 bots, and 5147 guests
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckGo, Custo, CensysInspect, proximic, ADmantX, okhttp, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Googlebot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, bingbot