I think it's great that poor indigent libtards like you have so many free internet forums to spend your every waking hour.... to kill time at before you die....JohnnyYou » 06 Mar 2026, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ You fail basic Five by Five IQ skills mister finisher of stereo cabinets that will never play music of consequence
youtu.be/4O76L_x_zfA?si=UcaSLD9dm9kVz_wD]WE'RE A GEDDON IT[
I think it's great that poor indigent libtards like you have so many free internet forums to spend your every waking hour.... to kill time at before you die....
Your idea of Manliness is evidence of how unmanly you are...
Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2026, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑
I AM THO ANGWEE...!!! I AM GOING TO MAKE A FIST AND PUNCH EVWEEE NAZI I SEE WIFF MY FIST...!!
The dancy panty hid our posts in the peanut gallery.Vegas » 06 Mar 2026, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ In his most recent PG thread, while his title holds his narcissistic dumb *** in high esteem, he posted a graph showing a low percentage of criminal convictions among illegal immigrants. Then he declares victory all through the thread. However, @Cannonpointer just obliterated him.
He just displayed a prime example of survivorship Bias...hopefully, you all will all figure out why he can't answer my question. He still can't figure it out.
This graph proudly shows people without criminal convictions but conveniently forgets one tiny detail: a huge number of cases are still awaiting trial.
In other words, he is treating “not yet convicted” as “innocent forever.” That’s like counting every student who hasn’t taken the final exam yet as having already passed the class. Let's congratulate this idiot for discovering the newest statistical technique: The Survivorship Fallacy of Pending Cases.
Step 1: Look only at the people whose cases are finished.
Step 2: Ignore everyone still in the pipeline.
Step 3: Declare victory.
By this logic, hospitals should also conclude that nobody dies, because many patients haven’t finished their treatment yet.
@Blackvegetable you have just proven that you know nothing about survivorship bias. Now go kill yourself.
![]()
![]()
Which of us is more likely to be built like that?
This ALWAYS ends with your tears and bitter recriminations.Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2026, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ The dancy panty hid our posts in the peanut gallery.
It's one thing to use that function to get rid of spam. It's another to hide spankings.![]()
What a ******!![]()
![]()
*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Mar 2026, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it's great that poor indigent libtards like you have so many free internet forums to spend your every waking hour.... to kill time at before you die....
Yes yes - I'm quite bitter, fruitloop. But you're the one who tried so hard to hide his shame, naked and answerless, taken to the woodshed by a guy who audits juco classes for fun.Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2026, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑ This ALWAYS ends with your tears and bitter recriminations.
https://www.blackinventionmyths.com/Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2026, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ can you figure out why I know so much more than you?
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
She didn't prove anything.Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
As a matter of fact the jury, having heard the evidence, disagreed.*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ She didn't prove anything.
none of her "witnesses" proved anything.
If you were convicted of rape with the same amount of "evidence".... you would lose what's left of your bat **** crazy mind......
Blackvegetable » 07 Mar 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ As a matter of fact the jury, having heard the evidence, disagreed.
$2 million dissents...*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ She didn't prove anything.
none of her "witnesses" proved anything.
If you were convicted of rape with the same amount of "evidence".... you would lose what's left of your bat **** crazy mind......
She didn't prove anything.
judge said it was rape, and I believe him*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Mar 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ She didn't prove anything.
none of her "witnesses" proved anything.
If you were convicted of rape with the same amount of "evidence".... you would lose what's left of your bat **** crazy mind......