Blackvegetable » 25 Mar 2026, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
So **** g'ddammned stupid
brown, this is the nail in the coffin…
here are the ‘objective facts’…
"rape" was not what informed the request for damages. Damages were sought specifically for "Defamation" and "Sexual Battery"
the Objective facts are verifiable statements or data points that exist independently of personal feelings, interpretations, or opinions.They can be confirmed through empirical evidence and remain consistent across different observers, such as scientific measurements or historical events.[img]blob:
523ac93d-2446-4e3f-bb11-baffbe6fc5b1[/img] fact.technology
Fiveable
the judge is flat out lying and full of **** pretending to speak for other people…that is pure speculation on his part…
it is solely HIS **** OPINION…
eat **** and die
#FIZZLE! Fizzl...fiz...drizzle...dick...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."