You pitiful thing. That was WOODWARD'S NARRATIVE.Blackvegetable » 22 Mar 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ How?
That's Grifty's personal attorney declaring his client too.stupid and guilty to sit down for a chat, under oath, with a decorated combat veteran.
I'm not gratuitously cruel.
This is gonna put another skid stain in your panties BV. But here goes....You posted a link that, that when summarized, provides the following..............................................................................................................
Sure...nice narrative...Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ You pitiful thing. That was WOODWARD'S NARRATIVE.
He was an asset way back when he was activated by Nixon's enemies in Operation Milhouse Shmilhouse.
Google, "hearsay," and then google, "o'er-credulous."
You were presented a video of sworn congressionsal testimony and refused to credit it unless provided a transcript - and now the same you proffers hearsay from a relic of the war on tricky dick. It would be difficult for those who have no familiarity with you to believe. They would think it satire.
Of course you recall your pain, but do you recall the particulars?You were presented a video of sworn congressionsal testimony and refused to credit it unless provided a transcript -
Sorry, I don't watch youtubes. Can you get me a transcript, you **** skifooza?Blackvegetable » 22 Mar 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Sure...nice narrative...
You doubt it?
https://youtu.be/sF5BZbOCOHw?si=5jrTNyfUOJu8FYQu
Of course you recall your pain, but do you recall the particulars?
Refresh your memory, and I'll show you why Gowdy wasn't under oath.
Nice try, queer.Blackvegetable » 22 Mar 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Refresh your memory, and I'll show you why Gowdy wasn't under oath.
What was he arguing?
There was no argument. There was fact-based testimony.
#attentionwhorebeggarpartdeux
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom but remember, he’s the apex of his domain…MR-7 » 22 Mar 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ This is gonna put another skid stain in your panties BV. But here goes....You posted a link that, that when summarized, provides the following..............................................................................................................
The Senate Intelligence Committee found no evidence that votes were changed, no evidence Trump conspired with Russia, and confirmed Russia targeted both parties. The report undercut the biggest claims made against Trump for years. It’s all in the report. Not my opinion — their findings. If that ruins the narrative, take it up with the Senate, not me. Wild how the actual report didn’t match the Twitter fan‑fiction version of events from you Slack-Jawed ****.
You know "Brown"...If you would actually read the links you keep dumping in here, you wouldn’t keep proving my point for me. It’s wild watching someone post their own self‑owns in real time. Especially anything to do with weapons, marriage, or math.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ****.Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2026, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ There was no argument. There was fact-based testimony.
Gowdy was ELICITING that fact based testimony. He was in no position to invent it.
He could not put words into comey's mouth.
Now, where the **** is my transcript, bitch?
MR-7 » 22 Mar 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ This is gonna put another skid stain in your panties BV. But here goes....You posted a link that, that when summarized, provides the following..............................................................................................................
The Senate Intelligence Committee found no evidence that votes were changed, no evidence Trump conspired with Russia, and confirmed Russia targeted both parties. The report undercut the biggest claims made against Trump for years. It’s all in the report. Not my opinion — their findings. If that ruins the narrative, take it up with the Senate, not me. Wild how the actual report didn’t match the Twitter fan‑fiction version of events from you Slack-Jawed ****.
You know "Brown"...If you would actually read the links you keep dumping in here, you wouldn’t keep proving my point for me. It’s wild watching someone post their own self‑owns in real time. Especially anything to do with weapons, marriage, or math.
What comey was on about was not the disute wherein you dclined to look at evidence wicj defeated your claim.Blackvegetable » 22 Mar 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ ****.
Gowdy was laboring the issue of "mens rea"
He questioning was premised on a lie.
Go brush up.
Like I posted earlier Slack-Jaw,Blackvegetable » 22 Mar 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ I don't give a **** about your version of things...