Liberal Forum

Huey » 05 May 2026, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 8:15 am

Damn, you are such a liar.  Keep bleating that talking point.

Poat my lie..


 

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 8:22 am

Poat my lie..


 

 

not policy nor is it an edict.

Already done.

Huey » 05 May 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 8:23 am

Already done.

Those are YOUR words...


**** idiot.
 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 8:15 am

Damn, you are such a liar.  Keep bleating that talking point.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal court ruled Thursday against the new global tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed after a stinging loss at the Supreme Court.

A split three-judge panel of the Court of International Trade in New York found the 10% global tariffs were illegal after small businesses sued.The court ruled 2-1 that Trump overstepped the tariff power that Congress had allowed the president under the law. The tariffs are “invalid″ and “unauthorized by law,” the majority wrote

Blackvegetable » 08 May 2026, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:21 am

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal court ruled Thursday against the new global tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed after a stinging loss at the Supreme Court.

A split three-judge panel of the Court of International Trade in New York found the 10% global tariffs were illegal after small businesses sued.The court ruled 2-1 that Trump overstepped the tariff power that Congress had allowed the president under the law. The tariffs are “invalid″ and “unauthorized by law,” the majority wrote

 

I was unaware that Kings answered to a higher court. 

Nice try.  
 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 8:15 am

Damn, you are such a liar.  Keep bleating that talking point.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.  

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations.  

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote. 


https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-doge ... =132762412

Huey » 08 May 2026, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:24 am

I was unaware that Kings answered to a higher court. 

Nice try.

Really?

This is what he did after SCOTUS told him "No" the first time.


**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 May 2026, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:25 am

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “blatantly used” race, gender and other protected characteristics to execute the largest mass termination of federal grants in the history of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.  

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon declared the terminations unlawful, concluded that the DOGE staffers lacked the authority to make those decisions, and blocked the Trump administration from carrying out the grant terminations.  

“There can be no serious dispute that the review process implemented by DOGE did not conform to, or even resemble, NEH’s ordinary grant-review process,” Judge McMahon wrote. 

https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-doge ... =132762412

Clinton appointee.....that's all one needs to know.

RebelGator » 08 May 2026, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:31 am

Clinton appointee.....that's all one needs to know.

We also know you're an idiot.

Huey » 08 May 2026, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:24 am

I was unaware that Kings answered to a higher court. 

Nice try.

Trump officials say they can build 250-foot arch without Congress’s approval


what a dumb hole...

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2026, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 5:48 am

Trump officials say they can build 250-foot arch without Congress’s approval

what a dumb hole...

I can do a lot of things without Hakkeem's and Maxine's approval......you on the other hand can't wipe your *** without a leftist directive.

 

RebelGator » 21 May 2026, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 6:09 am

I can do a lot of things without Hakkeem's and Maxine's approval......you on the other hand can't wipe your *** without a leftist directive.

You would probably purchase and relish for display one of Trump's used diapers.   "The Man is the Shyt!"

 

RebelGator » 21 May 2026, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 6:09 am

I can do a lot of 

try writing something worth reading.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2026, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 5:48 am

Huey » 08 May 2026, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 May 2026, 6:24 am

I was unaware that Kings answered to a higher court. 

Nice try.

Trump officials say they can build 250-foot arch without Congress’s approval


what a dumb hole...

 

You are reaching on this.

MR-7 » 09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am

Sumtin is a slang term that has gained popularity in recent years. It is often used to refer to something or someone that is not quite clear or defined. 

Example. While wrestling in the bed, Johnny was able to get on top of BV and put sumtin in his mouth. 

during the depression the term became popular in the burgeoning recycling business when the destitute came across sumtin…  
 

Huey » 09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am

I am still awaiting policies and decress from Trump that make him like a King.

“They’re implied”…    
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Apr 2026, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 8:44 am

Since March, the president, 79, has grown increasingly “nervous” about the forthcoming release of New York Times reporters Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman’s book, Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, Zeteo reports.

Close aides and advisers are said to have informed the Substack newsletter that Trump has “loudly demanded to know who in his Cabinet or his team” spoke to the duo from the Times. In response, officials have launched a hunt for the leakers, Zeteo reported, citing insiders.

Trump caught wind of the growing issue in March and burst into random, ill-tempered meltdowns over the leaks, crying “treason” and demanding the names of those who might have worked with the book’s authors, Zeteo reported. The book is set for release on June 23.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/panicked- ... lls-break/

It's not about you.

*YAWNS INCESSANTLY*
 

MR-7 » 09 Apr 2026, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 9:09 am

The Daily Beast cites Zeteo. Zeteo cites “insiders.” The insiders cite “people who heard from people.”There’s low‑effort journalism… There’s clickbait… And then there’s this steaming, unverified, pile of horse **** fiction that somehow gets passed around like its gospel. Let’s break down why you’d have to be a Slack‑Jawed MoFo to treat this as anything but garbage.

Not ONE piece of this is verified by a legitimate news source

Not one. Zero. Nada. The entire “story” is:

Daily Beast quotingZeteo quotinganonymous “insiders” quotingunnamed “aides” quotingpeople who “heard” something from someone who “might have been there”

It’s a gossip chain letter BV (Beta Vegetable). A fairy tale stitched together from "anonymous" ****. Anyone treating this as verified news is a Slack‑Jawed ****. 

I guess they should have conferred it with brown’s go to….


 

Huey » 09 Apr 2026, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 9:32 am

I know you are not going to list any policies, edicts, etc.  Maybe eventually some more rational lefty will do so.

  non existent methinks…

ROG62 » 21 May 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 6:51 am

I guess they should have conferred it with brown’s go to….

Who's this? lol