Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Won't be long now til one of your BUTT BUDDIES "Butts" in here to help you.

Help with what?

Tiny's doing his daily runny thing, and you're about to bleed out...
 

MR-7 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I am very disappointed to see this statement come out from NOAA," University of Oklahoma assistant meteorology professor Jason Furtado told The Associated Press. He said the controversy over the president's tweets and the NOAA statement undermines public confidence in meteorologists...

We know in whom you have faith, Ruby...

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

We know in whom you have faith, Ruby...

As long as you now know who said....NOAA said it.  
 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Why do you believe that you know what is "relevant"?

You're a moron.

Moron, post how you win the Presidency.  It ain't the country's majority vote total.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

I don't see the map to which your narrative makes reference.

Just the one you recently posted, the Dorian Projected Track map, (from about 8 days out from Landfall) which we are discussing.  You are a moron.  I accept your surrender

RebelGator » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

He can't articulate that, we're just gonna have to keep dropping the clues to him.

I am guessing his memory sucks.  Both short term and long term.

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Just the one you recently posted, the Dorian Projected Track map, (from about 8 days out from Landfall) which we are discussing.  You are a moron.  I accept your surrender

If the map validated his comment, why the modification?

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Moron, post how you win the Presidency.  It ain't the country's majority vote total.

I haven't said so.


 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Just the one you recently posted, the Dorian Projected Track map, (from about 8 days out from Landfall) which we are discussing.  You are a moron.  I accept your surrender

If the map validated his comment, why the modification?

 

Askholio, there you go with the **** questions again.  Anyone that can read a map (that precludes you) can see that 8 days out AL was under some threat of feeling some affect from the storm.

YOU jumped on the bandwagon you were told to jump on. 

With your lack of knowledge reading a map it is a good thing you chose NOT to join the military.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I haven't said so.

SO why has it always been a big deal to you, Askholio?

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

SO why has it always been a big deal to you, Askholio?

I've already explained that, Askholio

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Askholio, there you go with the **** questions again.  

Just answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I've already explained that, Askholio

Sure   

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Askholio, there you go with the **** questions again.  

Just answer the question. 

 

I did answer it.  Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it.  Your turn, Askholio.  Or, SFTU., Armslength.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:59 am

What's with the retelling? 

Just post them.

What’s with the request? Doesn’t seeing **** posted 15,000 times sink in?
 

Huey » Today, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:04 pm

Sure 

I did answer it. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it. Your turn, Askholio. Or, SFTU., Armslength.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:10 am

Why do people with brains consider him the worst ever?

#subjectivism
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:20 am

It was unsigned....and coerced.

On September 6, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) published an unsigned statement in support of Trump's initial claim, saying that National Hurricane Center (NHC) models "demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama."[5] 

Two agencies investigated allegations that the Trump administration exerted political influence over NOAA. The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) report, released on June 15, found that Neil Jacobs, the acting NOAA administrator, and Julie Kay Roberts, the former NOAA deputy chief of staff and communications director, twice violated codes of the agency's scientific integrity policy with their involvement in the NOAA statement. On July 9, the inspector general of the United States Department of Commerce issued a report confirming that Commerce officials had responded to orders from the White House which resulted in the statement issued by NOAA.[6]

@*tinyvictim took that bait as well.

You two are idiots.

Link?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:21 am

But they have PhDs..

You're a moron.

Yeah, like vanity fair had captions or you went to brown….              

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:04 pm

Sure 

I did answer it. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it. Your turn, Askholio. Or, SFTU., Armslength.

 

Wow, not you are imitating me.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness

Thanks for acknowledging my greatness and your mediocrity