Liberal Forum

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Try that again.

 
Have already told you 

I didn't ask for that...

This is why your pledge is worthless. 

BuckNaked » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

I haven’t

Scroll up.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Try that again.

 
Have already told you 

I didn't ask for that...

This is why your pledge is worthless. 

 

That is a comment you can't make until you take the pledge.  Look, I kicked your *** on the topic of the Dorian map,  You can't tell what direction it is telling you it was protected to go 8 days out.  Nor can you tell us what direction AL is relative to FL on the map. 

Until you do, YOU are the weakest link.

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

That is a comment you can't make until you take the pledge.  

No...I can...


I've seen it, repeatedly..

Would you like me to post examples?

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

No...I can...

I've seen it, repeatedly..

Would you like me to post examples?

You have no examples. because you have not taken the pledge.  Don't dawg don't hunt.  Now, if you take the pledge and I don't answer then you have a case.

I answer questions from others because they reciprocate.  You ask questions and when it is time for you to answer you declare victory and run, Mary.

Huey » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

You have no examples. because you have not taken the pledge.  

Would you like to see the examples?

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Huey » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

You have no examples. because you have not taken the pledge.  

Would you like to see the examples?

 

You have not taken the pledge.  You can't say I broke a pledge you never agreed to.  Keep trying.  When you take the pledge and start answering questions when asked and I don't, then you will have examples. 

You are a twit.

Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

You have not 

You have no integrity. 
Is that Yes or No?

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

You have not 

You have no integrity. 
Is that Yes or No?

 

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.

I bumped it and here is the link:

viewtopic.php?p=2890243#p2890243

When you take the pledge you will then be able to make those comments, Mary.  When you do accept it it will be game on.

Huey » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.

I bumped it and here is the link:

viewtopic.php?p=2890243#p2890243

When you take the pledge you will then be able to make those comments, Mary.  When you do accept it it will be game on.

You have broken yours..

Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.


 

Are these your words?

I did answer it. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it. Your turn, Askholio. Or, SFTU., Armslength.

Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.

I bumped it and here is the link:

viewtopic.php?p=2890243#p2890243

When you take the pledge you will then be able to make those comments, Mary.  When you do accept it it will be game on.

How about these?

Apparently you are not smart enough to realize that no charges means they did not quite have what you thought they had. 

Acknowledged you were answered. That is all you get.
 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 5:50 am

Huey » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.

I bumped it and here is the link:

viewtopic.php?p=2890243#p2890243

When you take the pledge you will then be able to make those comments, Mary.  When you do accept it it will be game on.

You have broken yours..

 

No I didn't.  BV never took the pledge.  So I can't break it.  When he grabs his sac and takes it and I don't answer within the stipulations than you both will have a case.

I have been posting with that nitwit a lot longer than you have been here.  I played hie game right after he got here.  He promised to answer my questions on a topic after I answered all of his.  When it cam time for that nitwit to answer, he falsely declared victory and never answer a question.  He ran.  So **** him.  

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:43 pm

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.



 

Are these your words?

I did answer it. Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it. Your turn, Askholio. Or, SFTU., Armslength.

That's a question.  You do not have that privilege.  You will have to look at the entire quote with the reply function.  That will tell you, moron,

Blackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:43 pm

You never took the pledge.  You are the one with no integrity at the moment.

I bumped it and here is the link:

viewtopic.php?p=2890243#p2890243

When you take the pledge you will then be able to make those comments, Mary.  When you do accept it it will be game on.

How about these?

Apparently you are not smart enough to realize that no charges means they did not quite have what you thought they had. 

Acknowledged you were answered. That is all you get.
 

Until you take the pledge you do not have question privileges.  See my previous answer.

Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

Until you take the pledge you do not have question privileges.  See my previous answer.

Braintree Rules!!!   Make Fee Line in the Straight....

youtu.be/OPemyipJzAM?si=eQ_fSr41pVBrPFgn

Huey » 21 May 2026, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 8:34 am

That is not a federal government mandate.  We have discussed this before.

So **** g'ddammned stupid 


Last year, Mr. Trump showed off a model of the development project, which resembles the Parisian Arc de Triomphe, telling a group of reporters in the Oval Office that the structure is "going to be fantastic." 

When asked by CBS News' Ed O'Keefe who the arch is for, Mr. Trump pointed to himself.  

"Me," he said

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:16 am

Huey » 21 May 2026, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2026, 8:34 am

That is not a federal government mandate.  We have discussed this before.

So **** g'ddammned stupid 


Last year, Mr. Trump showed off a model of the development project, which resembles the Parisian Arc de Triomphe, telling a group of reporters in the Oval Office that the structure is "going to be fantastic." 

When asked by CBS News' Ed O'Keefe who the arch is for, Mr. Trump pointed to himself.  

"Me," he said

 

Still not seeng a policy decree (EO) that affects our every day lives.   Keep trying coward.

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Still not seeng a policy decree (EO) that affects our every day lives.   Keep trying coward.

You can't see the Strait of Hormuz, it's invisible as  Uranus..

Who authorized the **** war?  For what purpose?

youtu.be/nkQ0LhcTNsY?si=Fuk2PqmgO555DE-O

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 5:53 am

Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Still not seeng a policy decree (EO) that affects our every day lives.   Keep trying coward.

You can't see the Strait of Hormuz, it's invisible as  Uranus..

Who authorized the **** war?  For what purpose?

youtu.be/nkQ0LhcTNsY?si=Fuk2PqmgO555DE-O

 

Congress has not formally declared war since 1942.  Stop your whining.  Or maybe it was the same person that allowed Obama to drone US citizens.