Maps illustrate landscapes, not speak, so they don't say anything. Maps are created by persons traveling routes from one place to another. Maps re-cord for the rec-ord to be used by generations not arrived so far as those that did exist were never duplicated twice dead or alive now.
Oh, I didn't know those wars did not affect any American's lives.. Seems to me 50K were lost for nothing in Vietnam. The place is thriving./. as long as they can get energy.Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Congress has not formally declared war since 1942. Stop your whining. Or maybe it was the same person that allowed Obama to drone US citizens.
Sigh.JohnnyYou » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh, I didn't know those wars did not affect any American's lives.. Seems to me 50K were lost for nothing in Vietnam. The place is thriving./. as long as they can get energy.
You asked what EO's are affecting Americans lives.. You obvously concede something because you say I am whining.
It doesn't appear that BV is feeling any better today. He may need Haldol, or something that is much stronger than his usual pot stash.
Huey » Today, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Still not seeng a policy decree (EO) that affects our every day lives. Keep trying coward.
And again you show that my assessment of what that map is telling us is 100% spot on.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Huey » Today, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Still not seeng a policy decree (EO) that affects our every day lives. Keep trying coward.
No...it shows that what you insist you see is irrelevant.....you have a capacity for missing the obvious.Huey » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And again you show that my assessment of what that map is telling us is 100% spot on.
Thanks, you're a daisy.
Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No...it shows that what you insist you see is irrelevant.....you have a capacity for missing the obvious.Huey » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And again you show that my assessment of what that map is telling us is 100% spot on.
Thanks, you're a daisy.
Quote the map, verbatim, Quimmie. Not yourself.
Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No...it shows that what you insist you see is irrelevant.....you have a capacity for missing the obvious.Huey » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And again you show that my assessment of what that map is telling us is 100% spot on.
Thanks, you're a daisy.
Again, you prove you can't read a map or know direction. That projected map, 8 days out from landfall, clearly shows Dorian moving west and to the north, over Lake Okeechobee toward the Gulf. AL is north and west of FL.
Thanks again!
Stop reframing, editing, and try that again. **** it again and I will repost it again. You can't read a map.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Quote the map, verbatim, Quimmie. Not yourself.
You can't read.
^^^^^^^^^^^^Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No...it shows that what you insist you see is irrelevant.....you have a capacity for missing the obvious.Huey » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And again you show that my assessment of what that map is telling us is 100% spot on.
Thanks, you're a daisy.
Again, you prove you can't read a map or know direction. That projected map, 8 days out from landfall, clearly shows Dorian moving west and to the north, over Lake Okeechobee toward the Gulf. AL is north and west of FL.
Thanks again!
Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑^^^^^^^^^^^^Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
No...it shows that what you insist you see is irrelevant.....you have a capacity for missing the obvious.
Again, you prove you can't read a map or know direction. That projected map, 8 days out from landfall, clearly shows Dorian moving west and to the north, over Lake Okeechobee toward the Gulf. AL is north and west of FL.
Thanks again!
THat is what the map shows, regardless of the Sharpie. If you feel it doesn't state your case. Without demands and questions, unless you take the pledge.
Sorry, try that again. My argument all these years is exactly what I posted about the direction of the map. Prove me wrong or take your second L from today. I can do this all day just to continue to embarrass you.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Post what the map says, verbatim.
post what you claim I can't read, Quimmie..
You can't even keep track of what you write.
Then he says this:Blackvegetable » 20 May 2026, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑
20 May 2026, 9:40 pm
Authorship need only be asserted - once claimed it can be falsified, but only with evidence.
Blackvegetable
Unless you post the prompt, you're not showing me....you are asserting it.
are those your words?He doesn't provide evidence. That only applies to everyone else.
Then he says this:Blackvegetable » 20 May 2026, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑
20 May 2026, 9:40 pm
Authorship need only be asserted - once claimed it can be falsified, but only with evidence.
Blackvegetable
Unless you post the prompt, you're not showing me....you are asserting it.
I'm citing evidence...Quimmie is declining to do so.
Then he says this:Blackvegetable » 20 May 2026, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑
20 May 2026, 9:40 pm
Authorship need only be asserted - once claimed it can be falsified, but only with evidence.
Blackvegetable
Unless you post the prompt, you're not showing me....you are asserting it.