Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2026, 9:31 am

@Huey  

You lied.

You ran from your lie. 

I think we're gonna need some definitions

They should have never signed The Magna Carta

https://youtu.be/WQgu0MpnKq8?si=evoTCaTTIIA_p8Fn

@sole s of shoes

https://youtu.be/nEVDZl5UvN4?si=X4jbPM6X09nIr6Tv

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2026, 9:31 am

@Huey  


You lied.

You ran from your lie. 

I think we're gonna need some definitions 
 

You ignore your specific time being alive as equally existing each rotation of the planet since conception. Context defines your character, genetics provide your physical characteristics since a fertilized cell and all the stages evolved since same as any human ever existed in this atmosphere when alive in thir relative ancestral lineage and generation gap inhabiting space.

Self evident time evolving vs relative time indexing human behavior womb to tomb each rotation of the planet so far.
Perpetual motion sustains eternal separation of results never duplicated twice and never same form since arrived by molecular content or ancestral lineage.

Molecular content has characteristics in three stages of consistency. gaseous, liquid, mineral combined into 4 dimensional results as planets, solar systems, galaxies, universal geographical locations.

Cellular results have generation gaps in 6 dimensions 7 days a week 8 seasonal shifts the planet has each annual revolution around the specific star of its current location.

changing shape as formed inorganic erodes organic results decomposes after dead. Series parallel time inhabiting space as specifically here now.

the whole is equal to the total sum of all its evolving parts currently existing here now as evolved since arrival as individual segments changing shape as formed without crating or destroying the natural process the universe is changing so far. Thermodynamic principles.

Huey » 09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

09 Apr 2026, 8:33 am

I am still awaiting policies and decress from Trump that make him like a King.

The dumbest **** alive...

Trump refuses to back down as Supreme Court blocks major policies

The president is seeking ways around rulings on tariffs, birthright citizenship and the Fed. Experts say the moves don’t signal outright defiance, but they push the court’s limits.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... t-rulings/

I HAD TO WEAR A PAPER MASK DURING A PLAGUE!

 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 5:16 am

The dumbest **** alive...

Trump refuses to back down as Supreme Court blocks major policies

The president is seeking ways around rulings on tariffs, birthright citizenship and the Fed. Experts say the moves don’t signal outright defiance, but they push the court’s limits.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... t-rulings/

I HAD TO WEAR A PAPER MASK DURING A PLAGUE!

 
 

 

The most partisan **** alive:
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 27, 2014
In a resounding rebuke of President Obama, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision yesterday declaring the president’s 2012 non-recess recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board unconstitutional. In response to the high court’s ruling, Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions Subcommittee Chairman Phil Roe (R-TN) said:
The president’s unprecedented action was one of many intended to further his own partisan agenda by circumventing the Constitution and side-stepping Congress. Thankfully the Supreme Court has helped rein in his abuse of power and restored some checks and balances to our system of government.

https://edworkforce.house.gov/news/docu ... tID=386187

AI Overview
President Joe Biden did not formally defy or ignore active court orders, but his administration pursued alternative, narrower executive actions after federal courts blocked broader initial policies. [1, 2]

Student Loan Forgiveness

• The Ruling: In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration's broad $400 billion student loan cancellation plan, ruling that the executive branch overstepped its authority. [1, 2]

• The Administration's Response: Rather than ignoring the injunction, the administration pursued separate, targeted relief using existing statutory authorities (such as income-driven repayment adjustments and the SAVE plan), which legal analysts noted were distinct in scope from the blocked nationwide program. Critics, however, accused the administration of circumventing the spirit of the court's decision. Fact-checkers like Newsweek noted that these subsequent narrower actions did not violate the literal terms of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Other Accusations of Overreach

• Eviction Moratorium: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden administration extended a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) eviction moratorium despite internal warnings from legal counsel that it likely lacked statutory backing. The Supreme Court eventually vacated the moratorium, leading critics to argue the administration knowingly enacted unconstitutional measures

@Huey  

The most partisan **** alive:

Grifty does this exclusively in his self interest...

The examples you cite don't compare.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 11:37 am

Huey  



Grifty does this exclusively in his self interest...

The examples you cite don't compare.

 

No link.  I wonder what you are hiding?
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 11:40 am

No link.  I wonder what you are hiding?

You're a tedious **** idiot.


It won't repost when I press the respond button.



 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 11:37 am

@Huey  



Grifty does this exclusively in his self interest...

The examples you cite don't compare.

 

That's your problem, Mary.

Sure they compare.  
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 11:48 am

That's your problem, Mary.

Sure they compare.

No...they don't. 

For reason given.


And don't pick another contest you can't prosecute.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 11:58 am

No...they don't. 

For reason given.


And don't pick another contest you can't prosecute.
 

 

You didn't give any reasons.
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 12:02 pm

You didn't give any reasons.

I gave THE reason.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 12:15 pm

I gave THE reason.

 

Grifty does this exclusively in his self interest...

That's an opinion, not a reason.
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 12:36 pm

That's an opinion, not a reason.

That's the reason.


You don't have the onions to debate it.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 1:47 pm

That's the reason.


You don't have the onions to debate it.

 

It is a weak attempt to avoid the actions of your heroes.  All you doing is confirming the validity of my thread where yo are not man enough to criticize dems.
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 1:52 pm

It is a weak attempt to 

You don't have the onions the debate the matter.....

Don't bluff.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 1:55 pm

You don't have the onions the debate the matter.....

Don't bluff.

 

It is a weak attempt to avoid the actions of your heroes.  All you doing is confirming the validity of my thread where yo are not man enough to criticize dems.

Waiting for you to start.  The point being is is your guys also did it.  But you won't admit it. 

 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 1:56 pm

It is a weak attempt to avoid the actions of your heroes.  All you doing is confirming the validity of my thread where yo are not man enough to criticize dems.

Waiting for you to start.  The point being is is your guys also did it.  But you won't admit it.

Where is your argument that Grifty isn't being self serving?

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 1:57 pm

Where is your argument that Grifty isn't being self serving?

 

I didn't realize I was required to make one.  You offered an OPINION.  You have done nothing to rebut my statement but whine and bitch.

I stand by my words.  
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 2:00 pm

I didn't realize I was required to make one. 

Of course you didn't....you believe you never need to do anything. 

I've offered evidence supporting my stand that Grifty abuses his office as if he is a monarch.

You posted a bunch of cases with no argument.

Explain why you think they disprove mine.