Liberal Forum

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

****.  

AI Overview
✅ Yes, survivors of service members who die from combat or in the line of duty on active duty receive substantial immediate and long-er term benefits that are significantly higher than standard veteran benefits. [1]

In the line of duty can be at Ft Lee, Va.

Bumped the evidence...

Which was provided weeks ago.

You can go away now.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Bumped the evidence...

Which was provided weeks ago.

You can go away now.

 

The officer was wrong idiot.  They are not talking about her life long benefits.  YOU SAID BENEFITS.  They are talking about his final paycheck:

The Air Force reached out to his widow, Libby Klinner, this week to clarify that his final paycheck would include hazard pay and combat-related tax breaks.

Stay out of military matters.  You are a **** moron.
 

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

The officer was wrong idiot.  

No....**** stop.

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

No....**** stop.

And now the asshole is ignoring facts

The officer was wrong idiot.  They are not talking about her life long benefits.  YOU SAID BENEFITS.  They are talking about his final paycheck:

The Air Force reached out to his widow, Libby Klinner, this week to clarify that his final paycheck would include hazard pay and combat-related tax breaks.

Stay out of military matters.  You are a **** moron.
 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

And now the asshole is ignoring facts

The officer was wrong idiot.  

 

it was an ACTIVE DUTY OFFICER SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED TO THE TASK.

"Line of duty" is a specific designation.

Please stop relying on your ability to read what AI throws at you...

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

it was an ACTIVE DUTY OFFICER SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED TO THE TASK.

"Line of duty" is a specific designation.

Please stop relying on your ability to read what AI throws at you...

 

 

Yes it is.  ANd you don't have to be in combat for it:

D you **** believe the US Airforce, ROTC?

A line of duty determination investigation is conducted anytime a member acquires a debilitating disease, incurs a significant injury or dies under unusual circumstances according to Capt. Mikal Nuhn, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa judge advocate. The findings determine whether or not death benefits are paid.

"When a military member is seriously injured or dies, certain statutory rights or benefits accrue to the member or their family," Nuhn explained, "but only if the disability or death was attributed to military service, and in the line of duty."

https://www.usafe.af.mil/News/Article-D ... 0to%20Capt.

I have a Line of **** Duty injury that I receive benefits for and I was not in combat.  STAY OUT OF MILITARY MATTERS.  YOU ARE NOT INTELLECTUALLY ARMED TO BE ABLE TO HANG IN THE DEBATE.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

No....**** stop.

 


 

The officer was wrong idiot.  They are not talking about her life long benefits.  YOU SAID BENEFITS.  They are talking about his final paycheck:

The Air Force reached out to his widow, Libby Klinner, this week to clarify that his final paycheck would include hazard pay and combat-related tax breaks.

Stay out of military matters.  You are a **** moron.
 

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

The officer was wrong idiot.

Stop.

Because the Administration wanted to reduce the casualty count, they reclassified the deaths...the problem is that, by so doing, they obliged the system to reduce the benefit due the widow..

This wasn't a "mistake" by the officer...they just delivered the news. They don't make the rules.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Stop.

Because the Administration wanted to reduce the casualty count, they reclassified the deaths...the problem is that, by so doing, they obliged the system to reduce the benefit due the widow..

This wasn't a "mistake" by the officer...they just delivered the news. They don't make the rules.
 

 

Post the benefits.  And by all means, tell us your definition of line of duty.

According to your article it was the final paycheck.  

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Post the benefits.  And by all means, tell us your definition of line of duty.

According to your article it was the final paycheck.

Did you die in the Line of Duty?

Were you widowed?


It is not only unnecessary given THE FACTS, it is a complete waste of time to do so with you.

You refuse to accept objective facts or the meaning of the words describing them.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Did you die in the Line of Duty?

Were you widowed?


It is not only unnecessary given THE FACTS, it is a complete waste of time to do so with you.

You refuse to accept objective facts or the meaning of the words describing them.

 

 

Is english your second or third language?

A line of duty determination investigation is conducted anytime a member acquires a debilitating disease, incurs a significant injury or dies under unusual circumstances according to Capt. Mikal Nuhn, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa judge advocate. The findings determine whether or not death benefits are paid.

"When a military member is seriously injured or dies, certain statutory rights or benefits accrue to the member or their family," Nuhn explained, "but only if the disability or death was attributed to military service, and in the line of duty."

https://www.usafe.af.mil/News/Article-D ... ermination


Why you calling the Captain, a judge advocate, a liar?
 

Huey » Today, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:37 am

No, I am constructing a sourced narrative.  Calling them Liars is an opinion.  I just reported the facts.  No opinion.
 

Are not sourced results opinions made throughout history recited over and over promising better economic tomorrows 7 scheduled days a week when every lifetime only exists as evolving since conception in series parallel events now?


ancestors are never same person born in two separate times lived so far. People believe life exceeds their heartbeats since conception. Intellectual minds pretend to be immortal while instinctive brain is temporal navigating space in the time its body lives uniquely here as specifically located daily fertilized cell to decomposed corpse.

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Is english your second or third language?

A line of duty determination investigation is conducted anytime a member acquires a debilitating disease, incurs a significant injury or dies under unusual circumstances according to Capt. Mikal Nuhn, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa judge advocate. The findings determine whether or not death benefits are paid.

"When a military member is seriously injured or dies, certain statutory rights or benefits accrue to the member or their family," Nuhn explained, "but only if the disability or death was attributed to military service, and in the line of duty."

https://www.usafe.af.mil/News/Article-D ... ermination

Why you calling the Captain, a judge advocate, a liar?

You're calling another OFFICER ignorant of his assigned task.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You're calling another OFFICER ignorant of his assigned task.

 

All I want to hear from you is either your definition of line of duty for benefits or admission that you are wrong.  This your dodge whenever you get busted posting ****. 

You find the PK?

How about the C5?

How about the CV gas?

What is the USMJ

Keep running.  Stick to skiing and some finance topics.  

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:11 am

‘I am the code’: Trump clashed with ballroom architect over safety issues

James McCrery II resigned in October after warning that the president was insisting on designs that violated fire and safety codes.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... ty-issues/

**** idiots

Fake news don’t be so gullible 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:11 am

‘I am the code’: Trump clashed with ballroom architect over safety issues


James McCrery II resigned in October after warning that the president was insisting on designs that violated fire and safety codes.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... ty-issues/


**** idiots
 

 

McCrery initially declined to comment but later provided The Post with a statement.“President Trump entrusted me with the earliest stages of the new ballroom design,” the statement said. “I am truly grateful for that honor and for the rich experience of working for him alongside all the highly talented and committed patriots at the Executive Mansion. Having completed the earliest designs, I stepped aside and a new firm was engaged.”

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/tru ... %20project.


More:

The White House said in a statement that McCrery’s exit from the project had nothing to do with the fire and safety code issue and insisted all such questions “have been addressed and resolved continuously as the design has evolved.”

You of course leave out what the other side is saying.  
 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

McCrery initially declined to comment but later provided The Post with a statement.“President Trump entrusted me with the earliest stages of the new ballroom design,” the statement said. “I am truly grateful for that honor and for the rich experience of working for him alongside all the highly talented and committed patriots at the Executive Mansion. Having completed the earliest designs, I stepped aside and a new firm was engaged.”

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/tru ... %20project.

More:

The White House said in a statement that McCrery’s exit from the project had nothing to do with the fire and safety code issue and insisted all such questions “have been addressed and resolved continuously as the design has evolved.”

You of course leave out what the other side is saying.

This is much too funny..

What would you expect each party to say to the public?

 

BuckNaked » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Fake news don’t be so gullible

 

 
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

nappyhead cmon man 

BuckNaked » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

nappyhead cmon man

No...I mean it...

You're a slackjawed imbecile.