Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2026, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:59 pm

Now, why are you 

I don't know how to explain the concept to people as stupid as the gen pop here.....so I asked AI - which explains things to very stupid people, like 
@MR-7, for a living. (in theory....copilot seems to suck, though not as hilariously as vegas' efforts at prompts)

@Vegas  has made zero progress, since first humiliating himself in November 2022, towards even a rudimentary understanding. 

 

Vegas » 01 Apr 2026, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Apr 2026, 8:18 pm

Acknowledge that you are a stupid pos and I will release the ban. Now coward. Do it.

Acknowledge that I judge and snap that chalk line across your abdomen.

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 6:12 am

Acknowledge that I judge 

      He still has no idea what "bias" means. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 6:09 am

I don't know how to explain the concept to people as stupid as the gen pop here.....so I asked AI - which explains things to very stupid people, like 
@MR-7, for a living. (in theory....copilot seems to suck, though not as hilariously as vegas' efforts at prompts)

@Vegas  has made zero progress, since first humiliating himself in November 2022, towards even a rudimentary understanding.

Nov 22 again, huh? Yet, I have given 2 examples since then, to which you still have yet to stop crying over. I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal. 

1. Post the examples and definitions

We literally went through that  ^^^ yesterday you dumb mother ****. God you are stupid. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 6:00 am

But I didn't "ask it for an example".

Post the prompt.

Post it yourself.

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 5:56 am

**** idiot.

I defined it in my own words.

Of course I can come up with examples....but doing so was @Vegas  job.

Of course he welshed.

After months of running he posted two comically pathetic efforts....demonstrating that he doesn't even understand the concept of "net".....because he is a goat **** cretin.

There is a very obvious example to which there is almost daily reference here.

Once Vegas posts another tragic attempt, I  will reveal.

I prove that I gave 2 examples and you take off a month.

Deal?

@Cannonpointer  @Deezer Shoove   judges. Period. **** off with your "I judge" ****. Either look up the word "bias" or STFU. 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:17 am

      He still has no idea what "bias" means.

I certainly do..

I posted an example.
 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:20 am

Nov 22 again, huh? Yet, I have given 2 examples since then, to which you still have yet to stop crying over. I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal. 

1. Post the examples and definitions

We literally went through that  ^^^ yesterday you dumb mother ****. God you are stupid.

 

I have gutted you in the definitions,

According to whom?

to which you are still trying to heal. 

STOP USING PREPOSITIONS.....YOU'RE MAKING ME NAUSEOUS...

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:32 am

I certainly do..

I posted an example.

You know what "bias" means? So then why the **** do you not know how it applies to your stupid "I judge" crap.

You didn't post an example. AI did. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:34 am

According to whom?

 

Narcissists never admit anything. Of course you won't admit that I did. Duh

STOP USING PREPOSITIONS.....YOU'RE MAKING ME NAUSEOUS...

I used it as a deliberate informal point you dumb mother ****. Seriously. 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:34 am

You know what "bias" means? So then why the **** do you not know how it applies to your stupid "I judge" crap.

You didn't post an example. AI did.

Like this:

Narcissists never admit anything. Of course you won't admit that I did. Duh

?

**** brick 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:53 am

Like this:

?

**** brick

God you are dumb. I swear sometimes you just post randomly without thinking. Notice you already knew what "that I did" meant. I didn't need to explain it.

AI Prompt: Is there a grammatical error with this statement: Narcissists never admit anything. Of course you won't admit that I did.

 

There is no major grammatical error, but the second sentence is a little awkward.“Narcissists never admit anything. Of course you won't admit that I did.”The part “that I did” feels incomplete because the reader may ask: did what? So the issue is more clarity than grammar. 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 9:56 am

God you are dumb. I swear sometimes you just post randomly without thinking. Notice you already knew what "that I did" meant. I didn't need to explain it.

Inbred ****.



Prompt: is there a grammatical error in this sentence "I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal."?



Yes, there is a primary grammatical error regarding preposition usage, as well as some stylistic awkwardness.
## 1. Preposition Error ("to which")The most significant error is the phrase "to which you are still trying to heal." In English, you do not heal to something; you heal from it. 
* Incorrect: "...to which you are still trying to heal."
* Correct: "...from which you are still trying to heal." 
## 2. Verb Transitivity
"Heal" can be used in two ways: 
* Intransitive (Self-repair): "The wound is healing."
* Transitive (Repairing something else): "The doctor healed the wound." 
In your sentence, you are using it intransitively (the person is doing the healing). Because "gutting" is the action that caused the injury, the relative pronoun needs to point back to that injury. 
* Revised: "I have gutted you in the definitions, from which you are still trying to heal." 
## 3. Stylistic & Semantic ClarityThe phrase "gutted you in the definitions" is highly metaphorical and a bit abstract. 
* If you mean you destroyed their identity or how they are defined, it works as poetic license.
* If you mean you "hollowed them out" using words, a clearer preposition might be "by" or "through" (e.g., "gutted you through the definitions"). 
## Recommended Corrections
Depending on how "poetic" you want to be, here are a few ways to fix it: 
* Grammatically Correct (Formal): "I have gutted you in the definitions, from which you are still trying to heal."
* More Natural/Modern: "I gutted you in the definitions, and you're still trying to heal from it."
* Impactful/Poetic: "I have gutted you with definitions that you are still struggling to heal from." is there a grammatical error in this sentence "I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal."? 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:06 am

Inbred ****.

Prompt: is there a grammatical error in this sentence "I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal."?

Yes, there is a primary grammatical error regarding preposition usage, as well as some stylistic awkwardness.
## 1. Preposition Error ("to which")The most significant error is the phrase "to which you are still trying to heal." In English, you do not heal to something; you heal from it. 
* Incorrect: "...to which you are still trying to heal."
* Correct: "...from which you are still trying to heal." 
## 2. Verb Transitivity
"Heal" can be used in two ways: 
* Intransitive (Self-repair): "The wound is healing."
* Transitive (Repairing something else): "The doctor healed the wound." 
In your sentence, you are using it intransitively (the person is doing the healing). Because "gutting" is the action that caused the injury, the relative pronoun needs to point back to that injury. 
* Revised: "I have gutted you in the definitions, from which you are still trying to heal." 
## 3. Stylistic & Semantic ClarityThe phrase "gutted you in the definitions" is highly metaphorical and a bit abstract. 
* If you mean you destroyed their identity or how they are defined, it works as poetic license.
* If you mean you "hollowed them out" using words, a clearer preposition might be "by" or "through" (e.g., "gutted you through the definitions"). 
## Recommended Corrections
Depending on how "poetic" you want to be, here are a few ways to fix it: 
* Grammatically Correct (Formal): "I have gutted you in the definitions, from which you are still trying to heal."
* More Natural/Modern: "I gutted you in the definitions, and you're still trying to heal from it."
* Impactful/Poetic: "I have gutted you with definitions that you are still struggling to heal from." is there a grammatical error in this sentence "I have gutted you in the definitions, to which you are still trying to heal."?

That wasn't the quote you just complained about in your last one. Do you really think I don't notice your dishonest games?  I catch you every time. 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:08 am

That wasn't the quote you just complained about in your last one. Do you really think I don't notice your dishonest games?  I catch you every time.

Show me.


You lie about everything. 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:13 am

Show me.

You lie about everything.

      I knew you would demand this. Narcissist amnesia. I prove it and you take off a montrh.

I want something in return if you are going to inconvenience me.

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:08 am

That wasn't the quote you just complained about in your last one. Do you really think I don't notice your dishonest games?  I catch you every time.

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:14 am

For God sakes. Not that one. I just told you that. You quoted me in a later one and had issues with it. 

Just stop with your amnesia. Enough! Either take the deal or **** off. 

Vegas » 02 Apr 2026, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:17 am

For God sakes. Not that one. I just told you that. You quoted me in a later one and had issues with it. 

Just stop with your amnesia. Enough! Either take the deal or **** off.

**** your retellings

.
Let's see your evidence 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2026, 10:19 am

**** your retellings

.
Let's see your evidence

All you have to do is scroll back , *******. 

Ah **** it. You are too much of a coward. Post 111 is your objection and post 112 is my AI gutting you. 


Get it yourself.