Blackvegetable » 02 Apr 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑
No, I didn't.
I have a sufficient command to
Call shenanigans on his original ****.
Define it in my own words
Call shenanigans on his "examples".
Eliminate all the incorrect options in his question.
Why have the two of you done, combined?
You wagged your *** about the number of people "convicted" in Trump's dragnet.
You made no effort to account for those whose cases were notyet resolved.
And in the above post, you betray that you cannot see the survivorship bias fallacy when you run it.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?