Blackvegetable » 01 Apr 2026, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑
Prompt: Explain "Survivorship bias" to a dull 5 year old.
Imagine you have a big bucket of broken toy cars.
You look at the cars that are still zooming and say, "Wow! These cars are super strong! They never break!"
But you forgot about the cars at the bottom of the bucket that are missing wheels or have broken doors. Those cars are "gone," so you don't see them.Survivorship bias is when you only look at the "winners" (the cars that still work) and forget to look at the "losers" (the broken cars).
It’s like saying, "I don't need a helmet because I never fell off my bike!" You only say that because you haven't fallen yet. You're forgetting about the kids who did fall and aren't there to tell you to wear one!
Does that make sense, or should we look at your favorite toys to see which ones are the toughest?
To demonstrate that you now understand, post an example.
Now, why are you unable to apply that across domains? Is that a cribbed example?
You presented statistics very recently regarding ICE arrests that manifestly relied on survivorship bias to make your case.
What the above copy-paste proves is that you can COPY AND PASTE ONE EXAMPLE of survivorship bias. It does not demonstrate - and your posting history demonstrates the opposite - that you can actually RECOGNISE, rather than google up examples of, survivorship bias.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?