Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 31 Mar 2026, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 5:46 am

Verifiable video?

https://youtu.be/6mjbUYJ-QnI?si=nB6wY5SCA7sPEO5N

ROG62 » 31 Mar 2026, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 5:40 am

wut, no WMDs?

Actually, no. They don't. 

Vegas » 30 Mar 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 11:05 am

      You think Iran is a threat to us? They were never a threat to us. They don't have the capability. They are a threat to Israel. Hence, why we are in it. 

Here, look at the details. Iran doesn't have nukes. They had the capability to build them, but they didn't complete any of them. Now let's assume, for the sake of argument, that they did. The most they could build would be 10 nuke missiles that could only travel 1200 miles.  The closest US shore to Iran is Alaska...which is 4800 miles away. 

But Israel is 800-1000 miles away. So do the math. Are we in this war to defend Israel or us?

Dang, this guy must know everything!!!!!!!

murdock » 31 Mar 2026, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 11:11 am

Dang, this guy must know everything!!!!!!!

I knew that your mom gave great blow jobs. 

jerrab » 31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am

https://youtu.be/6mjbUYJ-QnI?si=nB6wY5SCA7sPEO5N

Make sure to collect when it's your turn.

Vegas » 30 Mar 2026, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 8:20 pm

No, but your mom used to be Ayatollah's private whore.

               
 

Vegas » 31 Mar 2026, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 11:12 am

I knew that your mom gave great blow jobs.

             

 
 

Vegas » 30 Mar 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 10:38 am

During his campaign, Trump promised "no more wars." That is one reason many people, including myself, voted for him. So why are we in a war? Because of course we are. It's just what our country does. It's an addiction that our government has. We have been around for 250 years and have known only 17 years of peace. Therefore, war is our trademark. 

But there is no way Trump can squeeze out of this one. He was on record saying "no more wars." But wait....oh there is a way to squeeze out of it. Just call it something else, like a "military operation, "an intervention", or my personal favorite "a campaign." Then poof! There you have it. He kept his promise. All he had to do is change a word. Easy peasy. 

Sadly, this is Israel's war. Trump bent the knee to NutsinYou, and now here we are.

How's about this:
Like Korean War/Police Action, why not divide Iran into good half and bad half?
Slap that on Ukraine while we're at it.
Besides Germany and Viet Nam, we don't reunite as often as we chop in half generally.

Resolved.

B52s ruling the sky above Iran what targets are they going after?

jerrab » 30 Mar 2026, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 11:27 pm

lets just kill everyone in the world.

Ok, but they have to start with you!

*Roshambo » 31 Mar 2026, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 12:35 pm

           

Clearly sambo is extremely jealous of my mom.

Vegas » 31 Mar 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 11:08 am

Actually, no. They don't.

it was a GDUBYA joke…
 

jerrab » 31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am

https://youtu.be/6mjbUYJ-QnI?si=nB6wY5SCA7sPEO5N

TYT?   

jerrab » 31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 6:42 am

https://youtu.be/6mjbUYJ-QnI?si=nB6wY5SCA7sPEO5N

jerra bagging for orange cock again...

Vegas » 30 Mar 2026, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 7:44 pm

Their land is rich in uranium. However, we helped them mine it. This was back in the good old days, in 1967,  when Iran was a flourishing country. They had a government that pushed democracy. They had some of the best universities in the world. We were allies then, because we needed them during the cold war. So, we helped them mine their land for the uranium for nuclear power. Not for nuclear missiles. They needed energy. Nuclear power was just getting big then, so we helped build their whole infrastructure and we trained their scientists. It wasn't meant for weaponry, it was only meant for energy.

Then the regime that is in now took over. They decided to use tyranny as their form of government. They forced the scientists to build a nuclear program meant to destroy Israel and America with the uranium that we extracted for them.

Dude, the shah was a torturer and a CIA asset. We planted him on the Iranains. They were not happy with the shah. They were happy with the democracy we overthrew to put the shah in charge of them.

And the ayatollah khomeini was given his own compound in france, where he was allowed to plot the revolution that ousted the shah when he became too sick to keep his grip on power. The Iranians have not picked a leader since 1953. The west has picked all of Iran's leaders since, right up until today.

We murdered off the top echelon recently, but the same machine that we empowered through the french deep state produced new ones. They are STILL not the ones Iranians would choose - and if trump's gambit had proved successful, the iranian people would still not be choosing their own government. 
 

DeezerShoove » 30 Mar 2026, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2026, 10:31 pm

So the thinking is: You'd rather wait for them to have the bomb?

Ya gotta give us a number between 5 and 100.

How many times do we kill off all of their scientists and bomb all of their production facilities and utterly destroy their capacity to make a nuclear bomb before we have to stop killing off all of their scientists and bombing all of their production facilities and utterly destroying their capacity to make a nuclear bomb?

Your, "We can't let em get the bomb" narrative made SOME sense in 1988. Less in 1998. Even less in 2008. And after Obama's deal with them and their meticulous adherence to the treaty allowing 24-7-365 unfetterred access to the IAEA, it made no sense.

And even after Trump's unilateral abrogaton of the agreement, after the first few times he utterly destroyed their capacity to make a nuke, he should no longer have a right to keep utterly destroying their capacity to make a nuke.

It's like my Aunt Rosemarry used to say, "Fool me 17 times, shame on you; fool me 18 times, shame on you even more."
 

ROG62 » 31 Mar 2026, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 5:46 am

Verifiable video?

No porn.

If anyone takes him up on this retarded challenge, they are OFFICIALLY ENJOINED from showing hucksterbee fingering his own asshole while tonguing bibi's.
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Mar 2026, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 6:22 am

#objectivefactdenier

He just got through demanding proof that huckabee parks his tongue in bibi's ***. 
 

Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2026, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 6:59 pm

He just got through demanding proof that huckabee parks his tongue in bibi's ***.

It's a bit more complicated than that...the End of Days crowd sees Bibi as the Conductor to Rapture....
 

DeezerShoove » 31 Mar 2026, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Mar 2026, 12:43 pm

How's about this:
Like Korean War/Police Action, why not divide Iran into good half and bad half?
Slap that on Ukraine while we're at it.
Besides Germany and Viet Nam, we don't reunite as often as we chop in half generally.

Resolved.

But is it?

Resolved, I mean?

How is that partitioning idea working out on the Korean Peninusla?

And what right have we to dictate the end of Russia's war? Did we bleed for that land, or did they?

We were not pushed - we DID the pushing. Russia was pushed. And it pushed back harder and better and smarter and more successfully than we ever believed they could. WE thought the Russian people would turn on Putin's government. WE thought wrong. He is as popular as ever. The only flank Putin has to protect is his RIGHT flank. He has the eyebrows of the hawks raised a bit, for his incremental approach to the war. They want overwhelming force - shock and awe. He wants to limit the collateral damage. But the people? They are with him. 

And then we have Iran. If you think we are anywhere REMOTELY CLOSE to dictating events on the ground in Iran, I am pleading with you to tell me what news-sewer you are slumming in. We don't even have boots on the ground. The very KURDS - the world's ready proxy army that reacts to the word "chicken" like Michael Fox in "Back to the Furture" - have told the US to **** off and fight their own battle. 

I have no idea what the Kurds could possibly have against Trump, but that's their position. They won't fight in Iran, even if we promise them territory and statehood recognition for their trouble. The israelis have made it perfectly clear that they WANT boots on the ground, but those boots must be goy boots, animal boots - not human boots, not jewish boots. 

And landing in Iran with some k-rats and comms and commands is hardly shaking the Shiraz and perambulating the Persepolis. There's many a slip twixt cup and lip. 

You seem under the impression that the war's conclusion is written in the sands, inevitable and unquestionable. I do not beg, but I damned sure differ. I'm not even a quarter way through my bag of corn. I'm pacing myself, and I recommend you follow suit. The fat lady isn't even warming up. She's gorging on kabob.