
I SPECIFICALLYHuey » 05 Apr 2026, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ You are extremely triggered this morning. Why are you demanding we tell you what the graph is saying? First off it looks like it went up each year. It only fell after the spike from COVID spending.
I guess you are not very good at math
Princess, I don't give a **** what you called for. I accurately described the graph you don't understand. You want to order people around, call your ex or your daughter.Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I SPECIFICALLYHuey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are extremely triggered this morning. Why are you demanding we tell you what the graph is saying? First off it looks like it went up each year. It only fell after the spike from COVID spending.
I guess you are not very good at math
invited the neurologically impaired to leave
called for NUMBERS ONLY in any response...
Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I SPECIFICALLY
invited the neurologically impaired to leave
called for NUMBERS ONLY in any response...
You poor stupid ****, it was quiet because you had not yet posted your OP.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑
Would all those neurologically incapable of reading a simple line graph please leave the room?
Also, to the **** cowards among you....this will involve answering questions.....BUT ONLY DIRECTLY REFERENCING THE ABOVE CLEARLY LABELED EXHIBIT.
Thank you...sure got quiet in here....
Imagine an appropriate interval.Cannonpointer » 05 Apr 2026, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ You poor stupid ****, it was quiet because you had not yet posted your OP.
Do you have any clue, after all these years, how this "posting to the internet" thing works?
When looters burn cities and the response of a corrupted DOJ is to bow to the criminals, "crime rates" artificially drop.
Can you explain, with just a bit of arithmetic detail, what you wish you are saying here?Fuelman » 05 Apr 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑![]()
nothing like inflating the actual number in 2020 by adding 25% inflation to that number.
I had a friend/employer who ran a multi-state string of franchise food shops. He stayed open during covid and did extremely well throughout.
Between you opining and the crowd spitting on you?
I sat at lunch with two guys whose lives were entirely subsidized by the fed government, one had attended one of the Acadmies, the other (an incredibly smug stupid ****) ran a business which only made money by disintermediating large federal government orders in accordance with a mandate to "spread the money around".Cannonpointer » 05 Apr 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I had a friend/employer who ran a multi-state string of franchise food shops. He stayed open during covid and did extremely well throughout.
After covid ended, his accountant recommended he apply for free money. The feds rewarded him for staying open by sending him a check for just over half a million.
Like most of the successful small business people I know, he's a rank and file republican type who operates from thick red narratives. He told me, "I feel kinda guilty because this is the kind of thing I cuss about all the time, but **** it. Who says no to free money?"
He went on a few sex-tours of Asia before selling his franchises and buying a landmark restaurant in a second-tier american city. The half million was a big help. If you look real close, you can see that half million on your chart. Ya gotta do pointillism, but it's there.
Dollar says he was a patsy.Blackvegetable » 05 Apr 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I sat at lunch with two guys whose lives were entirely subsidized by the fed government, one had attended one of the Acadmies, the other (an incredibly smug stupid ****) ran a business which only made money by disintermediating large federal government orders in accordance with a mandate to "spread the money around".
It was all "wasteful Obama".
In 2021, the guy with the biz was charged with ripping off COVID funds and sent to jail.
No this guy was an independent contractor of Stupid...Cannonpointer » 05 Apr 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Dollar says he was a patsy.
And too stupid to know it.
brown, more ****** gallery ****? ****…Blackvegetable » Today, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑
Would all those neurologically incapable of reading a simple line graph please leave the room?
Also, to the **** cowards among you....this will involve answering questions.....BUT ONLY DIRECTLY REFERENCING THE ABOVE CLEARLY LABELED EXHIBIT.
Thank you...sure got quiet in here....
You can see that the spending in question has risen and fallen, over the relevant period.
To spare you inbred **** the abject humiliation you so richly deserve, I will not oblige you to stipulate to any names which may be associated with the inflection points..
In which years did the spending effectively DOUBLE in REAL terms, and in which did they fall or remain flat?
Please limit your responses to numbers....I have no interest in your version of The Truth.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I suggest you wait for his math....
apparently master poor stupid **** knows less than the self aggrandizing master moniker lets on…Cannonpointer » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You poor stupid ****, it was quiet because you had not yet posted your OP.
Do you have any clue, after all these years, how this "posting to the internet" thing works?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom