SouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 1:12 am » wrote: ↑ What a pathetic reply to that bible verse. The truth stings, doesn't it? The Bible itself says you are a fool. Let that one soak in.
matthew 25SouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 1:12 am » wrote: ↑ What a pathetic reply to that bible verse. The truth stings, doesn't it? The Bible itself says you are a fool. Let that one soak in.
it does not sting me one bit aaaand you cant say that it applies to me.SouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 1:12 am » wrote: ↑ What a pathetic reply to that bible verse. The truth stings, doesn't it? The Bible itself says you are a fool. Let that one soak in.
/////////////Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment////////////////////////SouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 1:12 am » wrote: ↑ What a pathetic reply to that bible verse. The truth stings, doesn't it? The Bible itself says you are a fool. Let that one soak in.
jerrab » 07 Apr 2026, 1:24 am » wrote: ↑ /////////////Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment////////////////////////
-----------------------------------------------------------------
your future
SouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, your future is so bright as you proudly vote for and support ***, "transgenders", corrupt career-politicians, and the mass invasion of "asylum seekers" that has caused the death of lord knows how many innocent lives. Sick seeing you stand up for Islam too. 9/11 was quickly forgotten, huh? NYC is now ruled by a Muslim. I'm sure the victims of 9/11 would be so proud to see that.
your future is etched in stone, no turning backSouthernFried » 07 Apr 2026, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, your future is so bright as you proudly vote for and support ***, "transgenders", corrupt career-politicians, and the mass invasion of "asylum seekers" that has caused the death of lord knows how many innocent lives. Sick seeing you stand up for Islam too. 9/11 was quickly forgotten, huh? NYC is now ruled by a Muslim. I'm sure the victims of 9/11 would be so proud to see that.
Who cares?Cannonpointer » 06 Apr 2026, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No. It was a cover. They did not find him a hundred miles from where he bailed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xa-xLSscSA
So it's your idiotic belief that once a military target is destroyed, it can't ever be rebuilt?Cannonpointer » 06 Apr 2026, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I just listened to Trump instead of you, is all.
He said it would be destroyed for more than a week or two.
Zeets2 » 07 Apr 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Who cares?
Of course, a dope like you would naturally get pissed off when you're given phony information that was used to direct the Iranians away from his actual location.
Try praising the incredible success of an American operation for a change.
But we wouldn't recognize you then, would we loser?
It was my idiotic belief that Trumpknew what he was talking about.Zeets2 » 07 Apr 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ So it's your idiotic belief that once a military target is destroyed, it can't ever be rebuilt?
I drive to your mom's house. She fixes it. For cock.Zeets2 » 07 Apr 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Do you also trash your car when it gets a flat tire or do you immediately repair it?
Care to back up that idiotic theory with some facts, moron, or did you just pull that stupidity out of your *** once again?Cannonpointer » 07 Apr 2026, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You're an idiot, son.
The Iranians know where they shot him down. The rescue op was a cover to steal the Iranians' enriched uranium.
The mission failed - like your life,ya lazy ****.
I've posted the proof in two different spots on the board.Zeets2 » 08 Apr 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ Care to back up that idiotic theory with some facts, moron, or did you just pull that stupidity out of your *** once again?
For your information, asshole, our pilot was downed and rescued in southwestern Iran, hundreds of miles from where Iran's nuclear fissile material is stored, at the previously destroyed nuclear sites of Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz. But why let the facts interfere with the kind of stupidity you don't mind showing everyone, right?
It must break your heart to recognize the fact that the success Trump has won is such a major victory, so your standard operating procedure for ignorant liberals is to immediately concoct the most idiotic lie imaginable, no matter how stupid you look trying to do so.
Just keep right on making up phony **** stories, believing that everyone here is as ignorant and gullible as you are!![]()
There wasn't a word of truth in that **** you posted.Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ I've posted the proof in two different spots on the board.
Get someone else to demand proof along with you. It's like dropping a quarter to make a penny worth picking up.
You wanna talk gulls, sissy?Zeets2 » 08 Apr 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ There wasn't a word of truth in that **** you posted.
Just look at any map and you'll see that the area where the pilot went down was hundreds of miles from where the Iranian nuclear facilities were, which is where the fissile material was stored.
You're easily the most gullible buffoon on this forum, and everyone knows it!
WRONG, fool!Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2026, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You wanna talk gulls, sissy?
You just watched Iran tell trump to suck it when he gave them two days. The again when he gave them five. Then again when he gave them til midnight.
And now, you are **** stupid, that you think Trump's bluff worked, since Iran is at the table.
It never occurred to you that it was Trump who broke - Trump who put something on the table that Iran wanted - Trump whomet Iran's red lines to get them tosave him from the humiliation of either walking away, or committing war crimes and then walking away.
And yes, you preposterous, clownish stooge - deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure is a war crime.
Search Assist
It is not considered a war crime to destroy infrastructure used by an enemy's military if it is deemed a legitimate military target.
Now, do you care to defend your beloved Russian leader Putin for intentionally destroying bridges and power plants in Ukraine while never accusing HIM of war crimes? Or is it just something an anti-American asshole like you or Jane Fonda only see because of your insane hatred for Trump and our country?Bridge Day and the Law of War: Limits on Targeting Infrastructure
Military.com | By Haley Fuller April 06, 2026
Distinction and the Status of Bridges
Under the U.S. law of armed conflict doctrine, attacks must be directed at military objectives. The Department of Defense defines a military objective as an object that makes an effective contribution to military action and whose destruction offers a definite military advantage. Bridges are civilian objects by default, but can become lawful targets if they are used for military logistics or troop movement. The key is functional use, not category.
Name ONE PIECE of civilian infrastructure in ANY country that is not "useful to the enemy", moron.Zeets2 » 08 Apr 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ WRONG, fool!
If ANY of their infrastructure is useful to the enemy, it IS NOT a war crime to target it!
Hey, asshole, don't get pissed off at ME because YOU'RE too ignorant to know the law! Show me where international law states that a bridge used for military purposes IS NOT a legitimate target in wartime, or just keep yapping your stupidity as if you've got a **** clue!Cannonpointer » 08 Apr 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Name ONE PIECE of civilian infrastructure in ANY country that is not "useful to the enemy", moron.
Any clean water civilians can drink, soldiers can drink. Any train tracks that can supply civilians can supply soldiers.
If we listen to queer-guy-you, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE.
So all those international laws we wrote were just jacking off - in your mouth.
If you ran a business, boy, it was in a bus stop bathroom.
Queer, Trump threatened EVERY BRIDGE IN IRAN.Zeets2 » 08 Apr 2026, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, asshole, don't get pissed off at ME because YOU'RE too ignorant to know the law! Show me where international law states that a bridge used for military purposes IS NOT a legitimate target in wartime, or just keep yapping your stupidity as if you've got a **** clue!