Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Where's that example?

     

So you are still playing the narcissist amnesia game.  I told you, I prove I gave you two already and you leave for a month. 

I want something in return if I have to dig them up. 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 9:44 am

     

So you are still playing the narcissist amnesia game.  I told you, I prove I gave you two already and you leave for a month. 

I want something in return if I have to dig them up.

I haven't gotten anything for answering your question AND defending it.



 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I haven't gotten anything for answering your question AND defending it.

You actually got it before I even asked that question. 

Consider it an inconvenience tax. If I have to dig it up, then you need to pay up. One month off.

Deal?
 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 9:51 am

You actually got it before I even asked that question. 


 

I'd take your word for it but.......you know......you're "christian".

Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Whatever. Deal?

You welshed, again, last time.


Because you're....you know....."christian".


 

Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Looks like a question...

You're in arrears...

Not close to what you've had in a rear.

 
 

RebelGator » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Not close to what you've had in a rear.

 
 

 

 

RebelGator » 06 Apr 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 10:02 am

Not close to 

Quiet, coward.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:15 am

Morans?

Ammosexuals?

Since you watch CNN, you probably didn't notice the Iranian government mowing down 40k protestors. 

Well, they don't have a second amendment there. Therefore, it is quite easy for a tyrannical government to turkey shoot them. The people have no guns. 



And your ******* still can't figure out the purpose of the second amendment when a perfect example is happening in real time. 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 10:30 am

Since you watch CNN, you probably 

So, you don't know.


 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

So, you don't know.

If I watched CNN, then I wouldn't know anything. Which explains your ignorance about everything. 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 11:00 am

If I watched CNN, then I wouldn't know anything. Which explains your ignorance about everything.

Then tell everyone what you watch which makes you so "informed"...

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 1:22 pm

Demand. Hiding again.

Is there a rule about demands?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Is there a rule about demands?

Hiding again. That's three times in a row. 
 
 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 1:23 pm

Hiding again. That's three times in a row.

It's time to resolve this...

I don't recall @Jesus running like a sniveling little bitch from his faith.
 

Vegas » 06 Apr 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 1:27 pm

This is
 

Your rule.

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 1:30 pm

Your rule.

It's actually yours. 

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 6:15 am

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”



Morans?

Ammosexuals?

I'm lost.

Splain this binnis about hunners of billyuns in rebates on tariffs. Who would be paying those rebates?

Edit: Never mind. Trump was talking. I get it now. 
 
He's mad at his court. 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 6:15 am

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”



Morans?

Ammosexuals?

That mark levin is one sharp cookie. 

Those dullards on the SCOTUS could learn something, dipping into his show. 

Heck, they could probably even call in to get more thoroughly schooled.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Apr 2026, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

06 Apr 2026, 6:21 am

Recall all that jibber jabber **** about "Historical Context"?

Watch...

One of the sharpest exchanges came from Chief Justice John Roberts, who pushed back after Sauer suggested the framers of the 14th Amendment could not have foreseen how “we’re in a new world now,” with billions of people “one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S. citizen.” 

“It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution,” Roberts replied.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/panicked- ... g-hearing/

Kind of hard to deny, though. That IS new.

No one was confused about the age of the Amendment.