Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You're indisputably a **** imbecile.

 

Coming from the moron who can't offer any thoughts of his own about anything. 
 

Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Coming from the moron who can't offer any thoughts of his own about anything.

I consistently anticipate events with which you remain unfamiliar years later.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I consistently anticipate events with which you remain unfamiliar years later.

 You use other others to anticipate events years later, then use another author to revive it.

Pattern: Neither author is you.               

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

 You use other others to anticipate events 

Post a reference associating Ostersund with Hormuz preceding mine.


If you can't you admit that you are congenitally deficent.

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Post a reference associating Ostersund with Hormuz preceding mine.


 

How would that display any of your own thoughts about anything?

Vegas » Today, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:46 pm

How would that display any of your own thoughts about anything?

Because it takes one fact, of which you are totally ignorant, and draws an analogy with a situation of which you are vaguely aware....

This means you are entirely unqualified to comment.

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Because it takes one fact, of which you are totally ignorant, and draws an analogy with a situation of which you are vaguely aware....

This means you are entirely unqualified to comment.

That isn't you doing that though. That is the author's. You keep bouncing me back to your copy/pasted ****. 

Show me YOUR thoughts. 

This isn't rocket science you dumb ****. 

Vegas » Yesterday, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:38 pm

That isn't you doing that though. That is the author's. 

Name this "author".
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:37 am

Name this "author".

Will naming the author display your thoughts? 

Vegas » Today, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:35 am

Will naming the author display your thoughts?

Failing to do so will display your moron.

Would you like to try again?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Failing to do so will display your moron.

 

Coming from the guy who repeatedly fails to display thoughts of his own. 

Would you like to try again?

Vegas » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Coming from the guy who 
 

Is still waiting for that name.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:20 pm

Is still waiting for that name.

Your op. Your job to come up with your thoughts. Your usual M.O has brought you to stage 4. 



1. Continue your usual 4-stage evasion:

• Ask Veghead a question
• Veghead responds with a question/demand
• Bring Veghead back to the original question
• Veghead accuses his opponent of not answering his question/demand while leaving the original question unanswered.

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Your op. Your 

Doesn't oblige me to prove YOUR assertions.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Doesn't oblige me to prove YOUR assertions.

Nor does it oblige me to prove yours. 

Where are your thoughts?



1. Continue with stage 4.

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Nor does it oblige me to prove yours. 

Where are your thoughts?

1. Continue with stage 4.

you weren't asked to.

Where are your thoughts?

In the OP, illiterate coward.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

In the OP, illiterate coward.

I see the author's thoughts. Not yours. So now your dishonest lying *** has stooped to taking credit for someone's else's work. 

Shocking. 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I see the author's thoughts. Not yours. So now your dishonest lying *** has stooped to taking credit for someone's else's work. 

Shocking.

I see

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

 

That literally has nothing to do with the conversation. But this is you, so I am not surprised you would deflect again...and again...and again....

Vegas » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

That literally has nothing to do with the conversation. But this is you, so I am not surprised you would deflect again...and again...and again....

It LITERALLY has to do with what you see..