shows how dumb you are, the dumb support the dumb obviouslySouthernFried » 09 Apr 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry, ***. Top tier president's dont get tossed out by their own party.
Or maybe stupid YOU can't figure out that it's Trump's strategy that will force our apathetic NATO allies that THEY need to help secure passage through the Strait, since the USA can survive quite well WITHOUT Middle East oil?jerrab » 09 Apr 2026, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ obviously stupid trump can't read a map that would show how iran could block the straight.
Zeets2 » 09 Apr 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Or maybe stupid YOU can't figure out that it's Trump's strategy that will force our apathetic NATO allies that THEY need to help secure passage through the Strait, since the USA can survive quite well WITHOUT Middle East oil?
Can China, Japan, India, and most of Europe make the same claim?
Do yourself a favor and stop second-guessing Trump, who is clearly far more qualified to prosecute this war than you are, and he's done a truly magnificent job already. Unless, of course, you can point to a single instance in recent history when one country has virtually wiped out the enemy's military in a country the size of Iran in less than two months?
Of course we realize that ignorant Trump haters like yourself will foolishly try to pick apart anything Trump does, even when he has mounted such an overpowering and successful war that has already saved the world from the dangers of a nuclear weapon armed theocratic terrorist regime like Iran?
I suppose YOUR heroes Obama and Biden would have simply continued appeasing them, even as they completed their nuclear bomb construction, right?
That's the difference between the pussified and demented liberals YOU voted for and the America First president that Republicans put in office to do precisely what he's done in keeping our country and the world safe from nuclear war.
--------------------------------------Zeets2 » 09 Apr 2026, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Or maybe stupid YOU can't figure out that it's Trump's strategy that will force our apathetic NATO allies that THEY need to help secure passage through the Strait, since the USA can survive quite well WITHOUT Middle East oil?
Can China, Japan, India, and most of Europe make the same claim?
Do yourself a favor and stop second-guessing Trump, who is clearly far more qualified to prosecute this war than you are, and he's done a truly magnificent job already. Unless, of course, you can point to a single instance in recent history when one country has virtually wiped out the enemy's military in a country the size of Iran in less than two months?
Of course we realize that ignorant Trump haters like yourself will foolishly try to pick apart anything Trump does, even when he has mounted such an overpowering and successful war that has already saved the world from the dangers of a nuclear weapon armed theocratic terrorist regime like Iran?
I suppose YOUR heroes Obama and Biden would have simply continued appeasing them, even as they completed their nuclear bomb construction, right?
That's the difference between the pussified and demented liberals YOU voted for and the America First president that Republicans put in office to do precisely what he's done in keeping our country and the world safe from nuclear war.
A third of all Helium goes through the Strait. It's a by product of the wells.jerrab » 09 Apr 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ --------------------------------------
The 2026 closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a significant global fertilizer shortage, directly impacting US agriculture by choking off supplies of key nutrients like urea. With over 50% of global urea exports passing through this area, US farmers face soaring input costs during the critical spring planting season, with potential for long-term shortages and rising food prices///////////////////
jerrab » 08 Apr 2026, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought maybe dumb *** presidents who don't know what the **** they are doing,
same thing for secretaries of war and secretaries of state.
Well ****, just keep spewing, you'll make up for it!jerrab » 09 Apr 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ --------------------------------------
The 2026 closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a significant global fertilizer shortage,
Humanity is 7,000 years old in recorded history, Iran has only existed in name since 1935. Want to discuss actual time evolving or history of human behavior ignoring how evolving actually happens daily here last 7,000 years which in relative time logistics is 350 generation gaps population never stays same ancestors twice?Deezer Shoove » 09 Apr 2026, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ Your second sentence says it all: 7000 years ... threatened countless times ...
the world would be better off without them.
They run a "protection racket" at the strait like neighborhood thugs. **** them.
It's a temporary condition and will be alleviated shortly.
All was fine and dandy until Trump **** it up.Zeets2 » 10 Apr 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's a temporary condition and will be alleviated shortly.
Besides, between the **** that you and CP throw here every day, there really shouldn't be any shortage!
you spew **** everyday claiming trump did not say he was going to commit genocide when he said he wouldZeets2 » 10 Apr 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's a temporary condition and will be alleviated shortly.
Besides, between the **** that you and CP throw here every day, there really shouldn't be any shortage!
Be careful ya racist ****
And here we have yet another idiot who doesn't know the definition of the word "genocide", and apparently you don't know the meaning of the term "civilization" either! A civilization can be destroyed without a single inhabitant being killed. A civilized society refers to the development of their cities, their government, their communication abilities, and their writing system. And ALL OF THOSE can be destroyed in a war WITHOUT committing genocide, which is precisely what Iran has been doing TO THEIR OWN **** PEOPLE, YOU MORON! Over 40,000 of them have already been brutally murdered by the IRGC because they dared to oppose the regime politically, AND YOU STUPID LIBERALS DIDN'T UTTER A PEEP ABOUT THAT, DID YOU?jerrab » 10 Apr 2026, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ you spew **** everyday claiming trump did not say he was going to commit genocide when he said he would
----------------------------
President Donald Trump threatened to commit genocide in Iran, ahead of warnings of a wave of attacks on civilian infrastructure on Tuesday night. “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again,” he wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. This followed a drumbeat of similar threats of wanton and criminal destruction. “The entire country could be taken out in one night. And that night might be tomorrow night,” he said on Monday, having recently warned he would bomb Iran “back to the Stone Ages.”
I really wish I didn't have to spend so much time educating you **** liberal morons!Search Assist
A civilization is a complex society characterized by the development of cities, social stratification, a governing state, and advanced forms of communication, such as writing systems. It typically involves organized agriculture, trade, and a division of labor among its population.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Zeets2 » 10 Apr 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's a temporary condition and will be alleviated shortly.
Besides, between the **** that you and CP throw here every day, there really shouldn't be any shortage!
https://youtu.be/Bd2WDb2HBHI?si=09tT4Z3AKF7T0A8LZeets2 » 10 Apr 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's a temporary condition and will be alleviated shortly.
Besides, between the **** that you and CP throw here every day, there really shouldn't be any shortage!
So you are AGAINST Trump destroying their nuclear capabilities and you want to leave the theocracy in power without them giving up their enriched uranium?
I am for Nuclear inspectors and inspection which has proven to be 100% accurate to date.Zeets2 » 10 Apr 2026, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ So you are AGAINST Trump destroying their nuclear capabilities and you want to leave the theocracy in power without them giving up their enriched uranium?
Why can't you come right out and state that you WANTED Iran to complete the building of their nukes and missiles that could reach almost all of Europe?
Isn't THAT what you're arguing for?
Or maybe you thought that Trump was as big of a ****** as Biden and Obama were, and wanted Trump to continue handing Iran hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars in bribes to promise not to build them, when we know they have cheated on every agreement they've made in the past?
And what would you EXPECT any Human Rights Watch or a UN advocate to say when we destroy legitimate targets of war?jerrab » 10 Apr 2026, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“What President Trump is describing as the destruction of ‘a whole civilization’ would be a war crime, plain and simple,” said Sarah Yager, the Washington director at Human Rights Watch and a former senior adviser on human rights to the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. “There is no gray area on this under international law.”Civilian infrastructure has been a frequent target since the U.S.–Israeli war on Iran began on February 28. “Strikes on critical infrastructure and industrial sites have disrupted basic services including electricity, water and telecommunications, also leading to increasing immediate and longer term environmental and health risks,” wrote the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA, in a brief report issued last week. Airports, cultural heritage locations, hospitals, industrial sites markets, residential areas, and schools have also been struck, including the civilian international airport in Tehran, a power plant in Khorramshahr, and water reservoirs in Fars and Khuzestan. Last week, the U.S. attacked the newly constructed B1 highway bridge, which killed 8 people, who were, according to the deputy governor of Alborz province, not military targets but nearby villagers celebrating Nowruz, the Persian new year.//////////////////////////////
Search Assist
Yes, if a bridge is used for military logistics or troop movement, it can be considered a legitimate military target.