Good advice for any human. I at least try to see beyond my cognitive bias but yeah, It's hard.Cannonpointer » 09 Apr 2026, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ If your mind were more open, your life would be better, cartoon.
If you understood evolving in plain sight, you would know there are no secrets about equally living one at a time, now. Reality ignores natural evolving 24/7.Blackvegetable » 09 Apr 2026, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ "yeah? You left out all the behind-closed-doors stuff!"
Were there any facilities that the IAEA inspectors did not have access to?LowIQTrash » 09 Apr 2026, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Let me guess...you wouldn't accept the word of any inspector or inspection team who claimed Iran wasn't developing nuclear weapons unless the party in question were approved by Bibi Netanyahu himself...![]()
The Council on Foreign Relations is a neocon propaganda "think" tank and is FOS...just like th3 Khazarian JUU kik3z who lied to get us into this war
There is no practical civilian application for 60% enriched U-235.Cannonpointer » 09 Apr 2026, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ CFR has an agenda and has told some whoppers over the years.
You got pumped in the rear like a girl in affie and iraq and syria, and now you are queing up with the SAME ESTABLISHMENT'S lies and parroting them like a girl who learned to appreciate a good ****.
All five of the permanent veto holders on the UN security councile signed off on the deal, plus Germany, plus the EU. But a clever guy like you knows better, cuz he listens to the career criminal neocons on the CFR.
Tell me something. When do you start putting AMERICA first, instead of elitist liars that **** babies for fun?
Who says civilians can't use smaller critical masses in a controlled environment? I forget the concentration in LWPR pellets..Fuelman » 10 Apr 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ There is no practical civilian application for 60% enriched U-235.
Iran wanted attention, they got it.
I'm willing to bet Iran hates the Jews even more than you do!
Fuelman » 10 Apr 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ There is no practical civilian application for 60% enriched U-235.
Iran wanted attention, they got it.
I'm willing to bet Iran hates the Jews even more than you do!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Sure that money could be going to subsidize electric vehicles and feed your nigga chilluns.*Roshambo » 10 Apr 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Strait is not open. Art of the deal failed as usual.
Bend over and prepare for an *** packing.
Meanwhile your tax dollars flow to Israel to support education and health care and other socialized services.
Proxies are for PR mainly.Cannonpointer » 09 Apr 2026, 10:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran has zero nukes and has committed zero offensive strikes.
It has not shot. It has shot BACK.
And don't bother mentioning proxies. I'm not interested in a discussion of proxies at all, unless those speaking of proxies are willing to admit without reservation that the US uses terrorist proxies in a manner equally abhorrent, even though the United States has more hard power than anyone in the game, which makes the US decision to use proxies less defensible.
Iran is now the tar baby that trump will sorely regret embracing - the US empire's Hardian's Wall.
From Trump's declaration of war on Iran going forward, American hard and soft power will only decrease. Iran was our Hadrian's Wall.
Racist bitch needs to be tuned upRebelGator » 10 Apr 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure that money could be going to subsidize electric vehicles and feed your nigga chilluns.
you are short and fatRebelGator » 10 Apr 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure that money could be going to subsidize electric vehicles and feed your nigga chilluns.
RebelGator » 10 Apr 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure that money could be going to subsidize electric vehicles and feed your nigga chilluns.
Just shut the **** up and watch the vid, you dummy.JohnnyYou » 10 Apr 2026, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑ Good advice for any human. I at least try to see beyond my cognitive bias but yeah, It's hard.
Who controls the Strait of Hormuz today? If we break 15 boats a day let me know. We were at 140 a day prior to this. A lot of economic material ain't moving.
I am struggling that I trust the Iranian evil regime more than the USA's. Reading people cheering them on is troubling.
Ukraine continues to pound Russia asymmetrically. The supply line to Crimea is getting cut.
I eat my spinach, but ths retirement shyt is ruining my strength to the finish. Life is over animated nowadays.
Yes, there is. It's used in medicine, among other things.Fuelman » 10 Apr 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ There is no practical civilian application for 60% enriched U-235.
Iran wanted attention, they got it.
I'm willing to bet Iran hates the Jews even more than you do!
Nearly every article you *** post is typed up by a small-hat.JohnnyYou » 09 Apr 2026, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Sheesh.. Some dude in sunglasses?
Is news printed on your toilet paper?
Actually,I AM a mind reader. I will prove it to you.DeezerShoove » 10 Apr 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Proxies are for PR mainly.
And plausible deniability (more PR really).
Still, the one thing people can point at is the obsessive stupidity of Iran pursuing the one thing that actually presents ammo to their opponents. Whether they like it or not, most folks don't trust them to be at all responsible with nukes.
** Actually I find it hard to believe India and Pakistan haven't pushed the button
(or floated the raft... however they fight with each other).
That's all we need is just one more set of pissed off people armed with a civilization changer. Which btw, I don't follow your logic about Iran NOT using it if they had it. You may be right but you aren't a mind reader either.
That is an easy one. Iran has been two weeks from a nuke for forty years.
Trump's own administration signed off that Iran was in compliance. You are simply lying. I'm not saying that your OWN lies are coming out of your mouth. But SOMEONE'S lies are.Fuelman » 09 Apr 2026, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I was against the JCPOA back at inception.
It's my cross to bear. I have no use for radical Islamist terrorists. The record shows Iran lied in the beginning and have continued to lie.
Do yourself a favor and research what other countries signed onto that deal.
He knows better than Russia, China, Germany, the EU, The Obama administration, the Trump administration, France, England, and the IAEA.LowIQTrash » 09 Apr 2026, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Let me guess...you wouldn't accept the word of any inspector or inspection team who claimed Iran wasn't developing nuclear weapons unless the party in question were approved by Bibi Netanyahu himself...![]()
The Council on Foreign Relations is a neocon propaganda "think" tank and is FOS...just like th3 Khazarian JUU kik3z who lied to get us into this war