Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:11 pm

Have you caught up on "dead weight loss"?

Have you caught up to having any thoughts of your own about it? 

1. I take it this will be your redundant deflection from here on out. My  response will always be the same ^^^

Blackvegetable » 14 Apr 2026, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2026, 5:29 pm

Zeet,

You're a **** idiot

Are you admitting that you're IN FAVOR of giving free healthcare to illegals, along with the free food, free hotels, free education, free smartphones, and free debit cards that your demented idiot Biden gave them?

Please respond! 
I've been unable to find a single stupid liberal who is dumb enough to admit they support giving illegals free healthcare when American citizens are forced to pay through the nose for it.  But since none have, I'm seeking someone like you who is willing to defend the asshole you voted for that gave it to them!
 

Zeets2 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Are you admitting that you're IN FAVOR of giving free healthcare to illegals, along with the free food, free hotels, free education, free smartphones, and free debit cards that your demented idiot Biden gave them?

Please respond! 
I've been unable to find a single stupid liberal who is dumb enough to admit they support giving illegals free healthcare when American citizens are forced to pay through the nose for it.  But since none have, I'm seeking someone like you who is willing to defend the asshole you voted for that gave it to them!

This involves questions of Principles, Priorities and Opportunity Cost.

Obviously not a conversation in which can play any part.....except to assume responsibility for refreshments. 
 

Zeets2 » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Are you admitting that you're IN FAVOR of giving free healthcare to illegals, along with the free food, free hotels, free education, free smartphones, and free debit cards that your demented idiot Biden gave them?

Please respond! 
I've been unable to find a single stupid liberal who is dumb enough to admit they support giving illegals free healthcare when American citizens are forced to pay through the nose for it.  But since none have, I'm seeking someone like you who is willing to defend the asshole you voted for that gave it to them!

Because I don't want to hear your **** let me be perfectly clear.


You are asking if I believe that providing mythical free health care, food and lodging to "illegal immigrants" is a better use of resources than bombing and blockading Iran?


Scooch closer...



**** YES!

Is that clear?
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Because I don't want to hear your **** let me be perfectly clear.

You are asking if I believe that providing mythical free health care, food and lodging to "illegal immigrants" is a better use of resources than bombing and blockading Iran?

Scooch closer...

**** YES!

Is that clear?

No asshole, I'm asking if the $22.6 BILLION that Biden's stupidly gave to illegals was a wise expenditure UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES and regardless of what ANY other taxpayer funds were used for!  That waste of taxpayer money HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CURRENT WAR, nor did it dissuade your demented idiot one bit from ALSO giving Ukraine hundreds of billions more for a war THAT HAD ZERO TO DO WITH THE US, and which YOU supported!
 

Blackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

This involves questions of Principles, Priorities and Opportunity Cost.

Obviously not a conversation in which can play any part.....except to assume responsibility for refreshments.

OK, I'll play!
Tell us the "principle" involved of giving free healthcare to ILLEGALS, while costs continue to increase and make it unaffordable for US CITIZENS TO BUY IT!
Is THAT the "priority" you pretended to be concerned about?  Giving something free to illegals that the vast majority of American citizens oppose?
That kind of "opportunity cost" you can shove up your ignorant ***, you stupid liberal!
 

Zeets2 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

No asshole, I'm asking if the $22.6 BILLION that Biden's stupidly gave to illegals was a wise expenditure UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES and regardless of what ANY other taxpayer funds were used for!  That waste of taxpayer money HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CURRENT WAR, nor did it dissuade your demented idiot one bit from ALSO giving Ukraine hundreds of billions more for a war THAT HAD ZERO TO DO WITH THE US, and which YOU supported!

Stool,

These are choices...

from ALSO giving Ukraine hundreds of billions more for a war THAT HAD ZERO TO DO WITH THE US, and which YOU supported!

The United States has NEVER spent dollars to greater foreign policy effect...

We have never achieved greater leverage from a dollar of Defense spending than those we sent to Ukraine.

 
 

Zeets2 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

OK, I'll play!
Tell us the "principle" involved of 

No, you won't...


You'd have to answer questions. 

You're a ******.

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

Stool,

These are choices...

The United States has NEVER spent dollars to greater foreign policy effect...

We have never achieved greater leverage from a dollar of Defense spending than those we sent to Ukraine.

Only a dope like you could possibly think that an insignificant and corrupt country like Ukraine could possibly be more worthy of defending compared to what Trump has spectacularly done for the world in Iran.

I'll leave it to liberal dopes like you who think you know better!
 

Zeets2 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Only a dope like you could possibly think that an insignificant and corrupt country like Ukraine 

Just shut the **** up, imbecile...


As of April 2026, estimates of Russian military casualties (killed, wounded, and missing) in Ukraine exceed 1.1 to 1.3 million, according to CSIS analysis. Daily trackers indicate Russia has lost over 11,800 tanks and nearly 40,000 artillery systems. Independent monitoring by Mediazona has identified over 186,000 specific individuals killed by name as of Feb 2026

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:28 am

Just shut the **** up, imbecile...

As of April 2026, estimates of Russian military casualties (killed, wounded, and missing) in Ukraine exceed 1.1 to 1.3 million, according to CSIS analysis. Daily trackers indicate Russia has lost over 11,800 tanks and nearly 40,000 artillery systems. Independent monitoring by Mediazona has identified over 186,000 specific individuals killed by name as of Feb 2026

And how has the US benefitted from that stalemate, moron?  

Was it worth the almost $200 BILLION we've given them directly and the additional $360 BILLION that NATO has given them, mostly from the US?  So what did we gain for throwing over half a trillion dollars at them, while crybabies like YOU whine about how much the war with Iran has cost us?  At least in Iran, we know we've been able to end the threats and promises of their intentions to use their nuclear weapons against us or Israel!  But of course, you only complain about what you call "Trump's war" despite the fact that every one of the last 4 Democrat presidents ALWAYS promised that they wouldn't let Iran complete their nuke program, but never did anything worthwhile to stop them, other than a time-wasting "agreement" that Obama made which Iran began cheating on almost immediately, while that idiot did nothing to stop their missile and ICBM development allowing them to reach most of Europe with a nuclear bomb they were only weeks away from completing.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Apr 2026, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2026, 6:27 am

Federal Reserve: Without Tariffs, Inflation Would Have Dropped to Pre-Pandemic Levels During 2025 

New study finds that tariffs were responsible for the "entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category."

Tariffs implemented last year by President Donald Trump's administration are entirely to blame for the recent surge in prices for consumer and household goods. 

Those tariffs have raised core goods prices by 3.1 percent, according to a new study by a trio of economists at the Federal Reserve. Those higher consumer prices were the result of retailers passing the cost of tariffs along the supply chain. 

As of February 2026, the tariffs "can explain the entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category since January 2025," the economists concluded. "Our estimates indicate that tariff effects on prices gradually build over time, with cumulative effects seven months after implementation consistent with our theoretical measures of full dollar-for-dollar pass-through."

https://reason.com/2026/04/13/federal-reserve-without-tariffs-inflation-would-have-dropped-to-pre-pandemic-levels-during-2025/?utm_source=Reason+Magazine&utm_campaign=43cde5d1b9-reason_brand%7Cnew_at_reason%7C2026_04_13&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_31d7ef7f57-43cde5d1b9-587966116

******* ****? 

viewtopic.php?p=2710355#p2710355

**** you ya lying *** pedo.

Blackvegetable » 14 Apr 2026, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 Apr 2026, 6:27 am

Federal Reserve: Without Tariffs, Inflation Would Have Dropped to Pre-Pandemic Levels During 2025 

New study finds that tariffs were responsible for the "entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category."

Tariffs implemented last year by President Donald Trump's administration are entirely to blame for the recent surge in prices for consumer and household goods. 

Those tariffs have raised core goods prices by 3.1 percent, according to a new study by a trio of economists at the Federal Reserve. Those higher consumer prices were the result of retailers passing the cost of tariffs along the supply chain. 

As of February 2026, the tariffs "can explain the entirety of the excess inflation in the core goods category since January 2025," the economists concluded. "Our estimates indicate that tariff effects on prices gradually build over time, with cumulative effects seven months after implementation consistent with our theoretical measures of full dollar-for-dollar pass-through."


https://reason.com/2026/04/13/federal-reserve-without-tariffs-inflation-would-have-dropped-to-pre-pandemic-levels-during-2025/?utm_source=Reason+Magazine&utm_campaign=43cde5d1b9-reason_brand%7Cnew_at_reason%7C2026_04_13&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_31d7ef7f57-43cde5d1b9-587966116


******* ****? 


viewtopic.php?p=2710355#p2710355

If your post was accurate, the results would have happened in the 4 years Biden was president. It didn't. the opposite came to fruition.