And the debate about hpw to debate goes on... I am serious, I am limited on time to look shyt up for you..ROG62 » 26 Apr 2026, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Translation = Look them up for me and see if you can prove me right. If you can’t prove me right, maybe it’ll take so long you’ll forget I posted this crap...
Babble on m'lard m'tard. Ya **** spewing bastard!31stArrival » 26 Apr 2026, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ science fiction, spiritual fantasy, hypothetical scenarios 7 days a week, social consensus rules over genetic timing of life by ancestors creating humanity over staying in the limitations of living eternally separated by their [physcial heartbeats since conception of their body relative to the previous 126 lifetimes that exited last 3 centuries.
I am incompetent about understanding exactly how evolving happens, irrelevant to everyone ignoring how and why they exist one at a time in ever changing form in plain sight daily here constantly comparing themselves to global population evolving same way and every society is proud of what they have done throughout history sustaining racism, bigotry, self doubt, social unrest, nobody trusts each other other than to stay in character come hell or high water tomorrow.,
There is comparing facts in relative time logistics and comparing evolving results in series parallel time. Know the difference. Understand the common missing link between every reality in history and current events.Johnny You » 26 Apr 2026, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ And the debate about hpw to debate goes on... I am serious, I am limited on time to look shyt up for you..
Search what I write and plug it into AI and see what you get.
Everyday the Straight ain't strait it's bad for every single person on the planet.. Your guy says it's too expensive to go Pakistan and talk. And Rubio and Vance are off the case.
And what detail might that be?31stArrival » 27 Apr 2026, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑ There is comparing facts in relative time logistics and comparing evolving results in series parallel time. Know the difference. Understand the common missing link between every reality in history and current events.
there is only one detail nobody discusses so far.
watch you revert back to staying on topic of social outcomes and not what drives social outcomes into current events staged globally here now among ancestors in the same species fighting each other over rank in their relative intellectually governed social order.Johnny You » 27 Apr 2026, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ And what detail might that be?
Do you think it odd that Rubio and Vance are effectively eliminated from the leadership? Could it be they told the man he is sick and needs to resign?
Evolving results? Just abpout every war in history is based on trade and resources. Vikings won wars by mayhem and crimes against others. Humanity has evolved to the precipice of overcoming greed. It is definitely a driving force, but what is incredible is that it seems even wild animals have a code of ethics. The observation allowed at least one scientist to escape atheism in sacred defense of the divinity in plain sight. (Have you seen the latest Lego yet? Iran snapped it together in 30 minutes after the WHCD.)
Here’s the deal, people making claims without any form of backup are just that, claims…since you’re already there when you see, hear or read it, copy the **** link…JohnnyYou » 26 Apr 2026, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ And the debate about hpw to debate goes on... I am serious, I am limited on time to look shyt up for you..
Search what I write and plug it into AI and see what you get.
Everyday the Straight ain't strait it's bad for every single person on the planet.. Your guy says it's too expensive to go Pakistan and talk. And Rubio and Vance are off the case.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 80% of the information I receive is on Youtubes.. I don't have time to go vet the information with a written article and if I gave you the timestamps you wouldn't even click them to watch because you have so much confirmation bias you won't consider opposing information to your views.ROG62 » 27 Apr 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Here’s the deal, people making claims without any form of backup are just that, claims…since you’re already there when you see, hear or read it, copy the **** link…
the time you’ve spent here complaining about what little time you have, you could’ve backed up 10 of those so called claims…
I find **** on YouTube all the time…If you post the actual thingy from YouTube, the link is automatically generated…JohnnyYou » 27 Apr 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ 80% of the information I receive is on Youtubes.. I don't have time to go vet the information with a written article and if I gave you the timestamps you wouldn't even click them to watch because you have so much confirmation bias you won't consider opposing information to your views.
I do not have time to keep trying to bring you up to speed. You are barefoot and running on beds of nails.
I don't even know what information you want vetted at this point.
Short of me actually sitting on the dock of the bay and counting the boats going by, you will not do simple searches your self to vet your own godamned information.
Yes, according to ship-tracking data from April 14, 2026, at least one U.S.-sanctioned Chinese-owned tanker, the Rich Starry, successfully passed through the Strait of Hormuz, navigating the U.S. blockade. While the U.S. reported that multiple ships complied with the restriction, the Rich Starry and other vessels were identified passing through, creating contradictory reports regarding the effectiveness of the blockade on its first day.
+2
Initial Crossing: The Chinese-owned, Malawi-flagged tanker Rich Starry passed the blockade transporting methanol, appearing to be the first vessel to do so.
Contradicting Reports: While tracking data (LSEG, Kpler) showed the vessel passing, initial U.S. Central Command reports suggested no ships had breached the blockade, with reports from BBC noting that Chinese vessels were some of the few navigating the area.
Subsequent Incidents: Later reports indicated the same vessel, Rich Starry, actually retreated twice when approaching the blockade.
Context: The US-sanctioned tanker was part of a broader, tense situation in the Strait of Hormuz involving a crackdown on Iranian oil trade.
The Hill
The Hill
+5
While one vessel was initially identified as having breached the blockade, the situation was fluid with, as reported by SCMP, contradictory accounts of whether specific Chinese vessels were able to proceed or were forced back.
As of April 27, 2026, shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz remains severely muted due to ongoing conflict, with only about 7 commercial vessels passing through in the last 24 hours. This reflects a continued, significant, and dramatic decline from the approximately 140 vessels per day that typically passed through before the conflict.
Free Malaysia Today
Free Malaysia Today
+1
Recent Traffic Data: Shipping data from April 27 indicated only seven ships, primarily dry bulk carriers, crossed the waterway, indicating that traffic has not resumed to normal levels.
Previous Days: Reports from the previous few days showed similar low numbers (e.g., 5-8 ships per 24 hours).
Context: The bottleneck is causing significant disruption to global energy and cargo supply chains.
Comparison: The current volume is only a small fraction of the 130-140 daily crossings recorded before conflict escalated around February 28.
+6
This situation remains highly fluid based on security assessments by insurers and shipping companies.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Dude, I won’t vet anyone’s post…that’s on them…and AFAIC, BS until …JohnnyYou » 27 Apr 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ 80% of the information I receive is on Youtubes.. I don't have time to go vet the information with a written article and if I gave you the timestamps you wouldn't even click them to watch because you have so much confirmation bias you won't consider opposing information to your views.
I do not have time to keep trying to bring you up to speed. You are barefoot and running on beds of nails.
I don't even know what information you want vetted at this point.
Short of me actually sitting on the dock of the bay and counting the boats going by, you will not do simple searches your self to vet your own godamned information.
Yes, according to ship-tracking data from April 14, 2026, at least one U.S.-sanctioned Chinese-owned tanker, the Rich Starry, successfully passed through the Strait of Hormuz, navigating the U.S. blockade. While the U.S. reported that multiple ships complied with the restriction, the Rich Starry and other vessels were identified passing through, creating contradictory reports regarding the effectiveness of the blockade on its first day.
+2
Initial Crossing: The Chinese-owned, Malawi-flagged tanker Rich Starry passed the blockade transporting methanol, appearing to be the first vessel to do so.
Contradicting Reports: While tracking data (LSEG, Kpler) showed the vessel passing, initial U.S. Central Command reports suggested no ships had breached the blockade, with reports from BBC noting that Chinese vessels were some of the few navigating the area.
Subsequent Incidents: Later reports indicated the same vessel, Rich Starry, actually retreated twice when approaching the blockade.
Context: The US-sanctioned tanker was part of a broader, tense situation in the Strait of Hormuz involving a crackdown on Iranian oil trade.
The Hill
The Hill
+5
While one vessel was initially identified as having breached the blockade, the situation was fluid with, as reported by SCMP, contradictory accounts of whether specific Chinese vessels were able to proceed or were forced back.
As of April 27, 2026, shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz remains severely muted due to ongoing conflict, with only about 7 commercial vessels passing through in the last 24 hours. This reflects a continued, significant, and dramatic decline from the approximately 140 vessels per day that typically passed through before the conflict.
Free Malaysia Today
Free Malaysia Today
+1
Recent Traffic Data: Shipping data from April 27 indicated only seven ships, primarily dry bulk carriers, crossed the waterway, indicating that traffic has not resumed to normal levels.
Previous Days: Reports from the previous few days showed similar low numbers (e.g., 5-8 ships per 24 hours).
Context: The bottleneck is causing significant disruption to global energy and cargo supply chains.
Comparison: The current volume is only a small fraction of the 130-140 daily crossings recorded before conflict escalated around February 28.
+6
This situation remains highly fluid based on security assessments by insurers and shipping companies.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom