Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:10 am

Post a list of your sources...

        If he isn't hiding behind  his incessant questions, he is hiding behind his demands.

This fool has no idea how pathetic he is. 


1. I won't hear the end of it for ending my sentence with a preposition.     

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 9:51 am

        If he isn't hiding behind  his incessant questions, he is hiding behind his demands.

 

You should take your serial demoralizations with more grace..

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You should take your serial demoralizations with more grace..

I would ask for an example, but we both know how you feel about questions, so I won't bother. 

However, I will grace you with my nuke bombs on you, if you ask nicely.    

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:01 am

I would ask for an example, but we both know how you feel about questions, so I won't bother. 

However, I will grace you with my nuke bombs on you, if you ask nicely.  

everyone is now comfortable with your contempt for facts...

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

everyone is now comfortable with your contempt for facts...

Everyone is now comfortable with your contempt for level 2+

1. Same old conversation...yesterday's convo...always the same old same...Still refuse to provide level 2+

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 5:20 am

 Vance Says the Pope Should Be More Careful When Talking About Theology

The vice president, who is Catholic, took issue with Pope Leo XIV’s statement that disciples of Christ are “never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/14/us/p ... orgia.html

you gonna take that...on your knees, Papists?

vance and trump should be careful when they pretend to be Jesus.

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:08 am

Everyone is now comfortable with your contempt for level 2+

1. Same old conversation...yesterday's convo...always the same old same...Still refuse to provide level 2+

According to whom?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

According to whom?

You first. You said: 

everyone is now comfortable with your contempt for facts...

Oh that's right, your rules don't apply to you...I have to answer, but you don't. 


So **** pathetic. 

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:20 am

You first. You said: 

Oh that's right, your rules don't apply to you...I have to answer, but you don't. 

So **** pathetic.

You first

:rofl:  

MR-7 » 15 Apr 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 9:31 am

Copilot...why did the fbi not pursue Homan?

Homan was not a government official at the timeThis is a major legal barrier.
 According to the New York Times summary (via Forbes and CNN):

• Homan was not in government when the sting occurred.
• That makes federal bribery statutes much harder to apply, because bribery laws require an “official act” or “public official.”

Without that, the case becomes extremely weak.

So....you sound like the one that is stupid. 

something is wrong with your ai

-----------------------------------------------------

Bribery laws in the United States operate at both federal and state levels, targeting the corruption of public officials, foreign entities, and private commercial interests. Recent landmark legal shifts, including a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, have significantly narrowed what federal law considers "bribery" by distinguishing it from "gratuitie

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

    Yeah. That's what I thought. The rules don't apply to you. 

QED       

Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

    Yeah. That's what I thought. The rules don't apply to you. 

QED     

Post the rules you insist don't apply to me...

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Post the rules you insist don't apply to me...

      Hides again. Well, if there are no rules about it, then go ahead hold yourself to the standards that you hold others. 

Go on, I'll wait....

jerrab » 15 Apr 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:30 am

something is wrong with your ai

-----------------------------------------------------

Bribery laws in the United States operate at both federal and state levels, targeting the corruption of public officials, foreign entities, and private commercial interests. Recent landmark legal shifts, including a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, have significantly narrowed what federal law considers "bribery" by distinguishing it from "gratuitie

Kash is totally perplexed...

There's Tom, a bag of cash and a transaction.

Could have been weed...we don't know..

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:31 am

    Yeah. That's what I thought. The rules don't apply to you. 

QED     

Post these rules

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Post these rules

So you don't have to hold yourself to the same standard that you hold others? 

Got it. Then don't expect others to comply to your demands. Moron. 

Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 10:36 am

So you don't have to hold yourself to the same standard that you hold others? 

Got it. Then don't expect others to comply to your demands. Moron.

What standard is that?


 

MR-7 » 15 Apr 2026, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 9:31 am

Copilot...why did the fbi not pursue Homan?

Homan was not a government official at the timeThis is a major legal barrier.
 According to the New York Times summary (via Forbes and CNN):

• Homan was not in government when the sting occurred.
• That makes federal bribery statutes much harder to apply, because bribery laws require an “official act” or “public official.”

Without that, the case becomes extremely weak.

So....you sound like the one that is stupid. 

======================================
 “If someone who is not yet a public official, but expects to be, takes bribes in exchange for agreeing to take official acts after they are appointed, they can’t be charged with bribery,” said Randall Eliason, the former chief of public corruption prosecutions in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. and former white-collar law professor. “But they can be charged with conspiracy to commit bribery. In a conspiracy charge, the crime is the agreement to commit a criminal act in the future.”

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

What standard is that?

^^^^this right here, this ^^^, is exactly why I started this thread a few minutes ago: 
My theory about Veghead's ridiculously crappy memory. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

                   He can't stop hiding and pretending. 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:48 am

Was there a transaction or not?

Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?

not pertaining to rape per your admission…

feefees