Hegseth quotng the Pulp Fiction Samuel L. Jackson Bible verse remake was outrageous!Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑ Vance Says the Pope Should Be More Careful When Talking About Theology
The vice president, who is Catholic, took issue with Pope Leo XIV’s statement that disciples of Christ are “never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”
no spam
you gonna take that...on your knees, Papists?
Samuel L Jackson would make a great leader..
really? SMMFHJohnnyYou » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Samuel L Jackson would make a great leader..
It would be a relief to hear "Mother ****" in every communication.
If you have never seen the compilation, it is worth looking up.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom release the clinger…feefeeboiBlackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ No fee fees..
Just facts...
Show "intelligence"
Try again.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He's such an asshole..JohnnyYou » 17 Apr 2026, 4:52 am » wrote: ↑ Hegseth quotng the Pulp Fiction Samuel L. Jackson Bible verse remake was outrageous!
That Monkey is taking us to Hell.
MR-7 » 15 Apr 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ You can find the summarized reporting from Forbes on the New York Times......I gave that to you already Brown.
The FBI itself said it wasn’t confident it could prove the transaction was bribery, which is why the case was closed — according to the New York Times reporting summarized by Forbes
DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2026, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑ In any of the Clintons' various brushes with the dark side,
BlaVe has said multiple times that "there was no indictment".
That is, to him, proof of innocence. Thread resolved.
Sure he has, CoozieIn any of the Clintons' various brushes with the dark side,
BlaVe has said multiple times that "there was no indictment".
Could you be less vague?That is, to him, proof of innocence. Thread resolved.
Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ Sure he has, Coozie
Show everyone that you are not full of ****.
https://archive.liberalforum.net/search/
Could you be less vague?
Perhaps a post wherein I insist jurors and judges are "soshulis" or something.
It might enhance your "credibility".
Natch...DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have to prove what I clearly remember.
Your defense (lockstep with other progs) of Hillary was exactly as I said.
Doesn't matter if a single other person believes that. You and I know it's true.
Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Natch...
Do you quibble with the universal assessment that you're a hysterical lying twat?
DeezerShoove » 17 Apr 2026, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ So you admit without saying anything (of course) that what I said is true.
Then why quibble in the first place?
Anybody with any time here knows you suck and cower a lot.
Of course you defended Hillary with gusto. Hell, you even defended that toadstool Joe...
It's no stretch to believe you were in the tank for Hillary "No Indictment" Clinton.![]()
So, you lie and deflect; pretend to not remember . . . whatta **** troll.
"Funny" is you pretending you're saying something.It's no stretch to believe you were in the tank for Hillary "No Indictment" Clinton. :rofl:
So, you lie and deflect; pretend to not remember . . . whatta **** troll.
Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ "Funny" is you pretending you're saying something.
I could ask you why the prosecutors surveyed about it by the IG said there was no beef....and what they specifically cited as precedent, but you don't have any idea...
So, about your feelings....
Make a liar of me....
You can do it...
You see me skin idiots with their own words every day.
.
You're frequently one of the idiots..
You speak alot about Jesus considering you are part of the party that fully embraces athiesm and even Satanism.jerrab » 15 Apr 2026, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ vance and trump should be careful when they pretend to be Jesus.
Religious people should stick to talking about RELIGION in the abstract & in the here-after sense... and WHY?Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑ Vance Says the Pope Should Be More Careful When Talking About Theology
The vice president, who is Catholic, took issue with Pope Leo XIV’s statement that disciples of Christ are “never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/14/us/p ... orgia.html
you gonna take that...on your knees, Papists?
SouthernFried » 18 Apr 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You speak alot about Jesus considering you are part of the party that fully embraces athiesm and even Satanism.
ConservativeWave » 18 Apr 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Religious people should stick to talking about RELIGION in the abstract & in the here-after sense... and WHY?
Because THRU-OUT History, there have been those who were GOOD, and those who were BAD... and the BAD have never hesitated to Conquer, Destroy, Kill, and OBLITERATE the GOOD whenever it has served their GOALS... and the ONLY way to keep the GOOD SAFE... is to FIGHT the BAD...and doing so WHEN THE GOOD have the advantage, KNOW how to obtain the advantage, KNOW when they have the advantage... and KNOW how to KEEP the advantage... and THAT's WHY EVEN GOOD people ask our Military and Political Leaders...to do THAT JOB for us, to DO IT WELL... and keep it SEPARATE from our RELIGION, and our Religious Leaders...
...and WHY do we do that? Because SOMETIMES its necessary to ask our Political and Military leaders to KEEP us SAFE... to do that, THEY have to kill the "BAD" people... AND WHEN THAT HAPPENS, we ask our Religious leaders NOT TO MEDDLE in things OF WHICH THEY have NO KNOWLEDGE...
BUT, what's the REALLY EVIL... Is when Political enemies try to USE the ONE against the other, for POLITICAL ADVANTAGE & POWER... RATHER than consider whats BEST for "We the PEOPLE" above all else... BECAUSE IT'S THEN, that "WE THE PEOPLE" REALLY need to THINK... WHO the REAL enemies ARE, and WHO THEY ARE NOT
matthew 7SouthernFried » 18 Apr 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You speak alot about Jesus considering you are part of the party that fully embraces athiesm and even Satanism.