Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:28 am

Under subpoena.

Duh...


**** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:30 am

Duh...

**** moron.

There's nothing "duh" about your attempt to try and express a lie about Republicans being anything but hostile witnesses. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:26 am

Tell me why you think it is a "key detail"

 

Wow.  You are like Jello.  ALl that wiggling around.

RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:33 am

There's nothing "duh" about your attempt to try and express a lie about Republicans being anything but hostile witnesses.

Name one.

Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am

Wow.  You are like Jello.  ALl that wiggling around.

Tiny,

Tell me why you think it is a "key detail"....

This will be the leading contender for Curbstomping of the Year.....let's get on with it..
 

Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am

Wow.  You are like Jello.  ALl that wiggling around.

A characteristic of organisms that have no spine.

RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:37 am

A characteristic of organisms that have no spine.

 

If you say you are, sure.  
 

RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:33 am

There's nothing "duh" about your attempt to try and express a lie about Republicans being anything but hostile witnesses.

So **** g'ddammned credulous.



More than 200 former Trump administration staffers and White House officials voluntarily spoke with the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack,
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:41 am

So **** g'ddammned credulous.

More than 200 former Trump administration staffers and White House officials voluntarily spoke with the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack,

Sure they volunteered,  you are one stupid jackass.

RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:46 am

Sure they volunteered,  you are one stupid jackass.

You're a **** moron.

Meadows and Grafty didn't want to respond under oath.

There were NO "hostile witnesses"
 

Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 6:33 am

All the charges for Seditious Conspiracy.  You left that out.

C'mon, Girlie!

Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 7:34 am

Wow.  You are like Jello.  ALl that wiggling around.

You're standing there with the golf tee clenched twixt your flabby buttocks...

Now take a seat..

 

https://youtu.be/k9IfHDi-2EA?si=JfbBo8OX2rTfCddo

Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 6:33 am

All the charges for Seditious Conspiracy.  You left that out.

by trump's appointed judge???


   

perry smith own special judge would have cleared him too.


 

/////////////Having killed all four members of the family, Hickock and Smith fled the crime scene, taking with them a Zenith portable radio belonging to Kenyon Clutter, a pair of binoculars belonging to Herb Clutter and less than $50 (equivalent to $552 in 2025) in cash presumed to have been left over from a $60 check Herb Clutter ////////////////

Rating a user's behavior on a scale of "Gandhi to Vlad the Impaler"is inherently subjective, but based on forum activity, Blackvegetable (BV) is known on Liberal Forum for a highly aggressive and confrontational rhetorical style. [1] While the "cruelties" mentioned refer to online verbal sparring rather than physical acts, BV’s presence on the forum is characterized by: 

* Hostile Rhetoric: Thread titles such as "Did You Pinheads Think Reason Was Done Voiding Its Bowels Down The Neck of MAGA?" illustrate a sharp, insulting tone directed at political opponents.

* Moderation Power: There is evidence of community tension regarding their influence, with dedicated threads like "This thread is for posts deleted by BV," suggesting that some users view their moderation or posting behavior as suppressive or overly harsh.

* Persistent Conflict: The user regularly engages in "us-versus-them" exchanges, often using provocative language to challenge Trump supporters and other forum members. [1, 2, 3]  

In terms of a numerical rating, while Gandhi (0) represents radical non-violence and Vlad the Impaler (10) represents literal mass torture, Blackvegetable would fall into the category of a high-intensity internet polemicist. On a scale of rhetorical "cruelty" within a digital debate setting, many forum regulars might place them toward the higher end for their abrasive language, though this remains a matter of perspective among the site's community. [4, 5]  

[1] https://liberalforum.net[2] https://liberalforum.net[3] [https://www.reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskALiberal/co ... y_cruelty/)[4] [https://www.reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/history/commen ... ad_as_his/)[5] [https://www.history.co.uk](https://www.history.co.uk/articles/vlad ... ed-dracula) 
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am

Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots. 

In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/

"Why are you always reminding us that he's a rapist felon!"

-----------------------------------------------

On May 8, 2025, President Trump named her as the interim United States attorney for the District of Columbia to succeed Ed Martin.[10] She was sworn in on May 28,[11] and confirmed to the full position on August 2, 2025.[12]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

riiiiight...................

                   

BV is a **** pos liberal shill that sucks chink dick

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am

Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots. 

In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/

"Why are you always reminding us that he's a rapist felon!"

------------------------------------------


What happened to judge Pirro's husband?
On June 23, 2000, a jury found Pirro's husband guilty of 23 of the charges brought against him and not guilty of 10 others. He served 17 months in prison, being released early for good behavior and participating in an alcoholism treatment program.

Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am

Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots. 

In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/

 

---------------------------------------------------

While recognized for her prosecution of domestic violence, Pirro was criticized for her relative prosecutorial absence in bringing charges involving major public corruption or organized crime.[22] These criticisms intensified when Pirro's husband was later convicted of several felonies tied to organized crime, including tax evasion and conspiracy.