jerrab » 15 Apr 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ ------------------------------------------
What happened to judge Pirro's husband?
On June 23, 2000, a jury found Pirro's husband guilty of 23 of the charges brought against him and not guilty of 10 others. He served 17 months in prison, being released early for good behavior and participating in an alcoholism treatment program.
RebelGator » 15 Apr 2026, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ There's nothing "duh" about your attempt to try and express a lie about Republicans being anything but hostile witnesses.
-----------------------------------Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots.
In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/
"Why are you always reminding us that he's a rapist felon!"
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/jan-6-com ... 2271045949Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots.
In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/
"Why are you always reminding us that he's a rapist felon!"
You're still talking about that? Pathetic. The nation already showed you what it thought of "MuH JANuArY 6Th" in November of 2024. Your stupid bitch lost in a landslide. Now you think that's going to be a voting issue in 26 and 28? L, OH, **** L.Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ You dutifully averted your eyes from the Jan 6th hearings, Stooge...
You still ranting and raving about that and using it as a diversion.Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ You dutifully averted your eyes from the Jan 6th hearings, Stooge...
Post a "rant".Huey » 15 Apr 2026, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You still ranting and raving about that and using it as a diversion.
No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑ Pirro said that once the latest slate of convictions is vacated, she intends to file motions to dismiss all the underlying charges in the trial court. That move, once approved by a judge, would fully clear all 12 defendants’ criminal records for having participated in the Jan. 6 riots.
In court filings Tuesday, Pirro gave no details explaining her action, saying only that “the United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.” The U.S. attorney’s office declined to comment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... onspiracy/
"Why are you always reminding us that he's a rapist felon!"
Vegas » 15 Apr 2026, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.
Unless you signed it, then I retract my statement.
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!Blackvegetable » 15 Apr 2026, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you insist on describing something you didn't see?
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICKSUCKER!