I remember when Obama left office.... he SAID his administration was the MOST HONEST that that had ever held the office... BUT, It turns out, it was ALL A LIE !! It was only because he was able to subvert the entire Government Bureaucracy, that he was able to KEEP the LIES and ABUSE under wraps... BUT NOW, the Trump administration (because of the bureaucracy's CONTINUING effort to destroy him) Donald Trump has CAUSE to EXPOSE IT ALL !!
That you're falling for this ****....AGAIN?
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ That you're falling for this ****....AGAIN?
No one...
Has Grafty addressed this matter under oath?
REALLY? Well there are now TONS of "Once Classified" Obama Admin. documents that have now been released... and that PROVE Obama was responsible of ONE CORRUPT Act after another... as follows:
Literally none...ConservativeWave » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ REALLY? Well there are now TONS of "Once Classified" Obama Admin. documents that have now been released... and that PROVE Obama was responsible of ONE CORRUPT Act after another... as follows:
1. Obamacare was a carefully orchestrated FRAUD... where the "One Payer" Obamacare system paid the BIG Healthcare companies (Not the users) who then used the money to pad their profits... and those profits ROSE 1600% between 2010 and 2024... or something like 60% a year appreciation, which they then KICKED BACK millions to the Democrat Party and made Democrat politicians (Nancy Pelosi and others) RICH !!
2. Obama INTENTIONALLY falsified classified evidence against Donald Trump that INITIATED the Mueller Investigation, CONTINUOUS accusations against trump and TWO IMPEACHMENT attempts... ALL of which went NO WHERE... and subsequently were PROVEN to be Orchestrated FRAUD by Barack Obama !
THAT ALONE would have landed a NORMAL American in prison for YEARS... but the CORRUPT Democrat Party PERMITTED it to STAND for YEARS, until the UNDENIABLE PROOF was released, and now WE KNOW the TRUTH... while Barack Obama said THIS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDihbGDZurw
Why does it matter about the time?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ Has Grafty addressed this matter under oath?
Would save a lot of time.
Time is money.
How much did it bother you that $32 million was spent in 3 years on the russia hoax?
Here are 5 volumes of "hoax"MR-7 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How much did it bother you that $32 million was spent in 3 years on the russia hoax?
This is the question....How much did it bother you that $32 million was spent in 3 years on the russia hoax? If you won't answer, then move on COWARD.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Here are 5 volumes of "hoax"
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/202 ... -measures/
There was no "Russia Russia Hoax'....there was an investigation concludingexperience that the Russian asset, for whom you cast 3 enthusiastic votes, was a national security risk......MR-7 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is the question....How much did it bother you that $32 million was spent in 3 years on the russia hoax? If you won't answer, then move on COWARD.
National security risk.....was never a finding. It never appeared as a conclusion in Mueller’s findings, The IG report, The Durham report, or any official DOJ statement. Not one official report concluded Trump was a ‘Russian asset.’ So, as usual, you are a **** LIAR.Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There was no "Russia Russia Hoax'....there was an investigation concluding that the Russian asset, for whom you cast 3 enthusiastic votes, was a national security risk......
I could have told them that for a fine dining experience
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... y-new-bookMR-7 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ National security risk.....was never a finding. It never appeared as a conclusion in Mueller’s findings, The IG report, The Durham report, or any official DOJ statement. Not one official report concluded Trump was a ‘Russian asset.’ So, as usual, you are a **** LIAR.
You posted two links that don’t say what you think they say Slack-Jaw.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53830374MR-7 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You posted two links that don’t say what you think they say Slack-Jaw.
The Guardian link is about a book written by a former FBI official — not an official DOJ conclusion. Books are opinions, not findings. The Futurism link is literally an article about what an AI chatbot said. Again, not an investigation, not a government report. None of these changes the fact that the Mueller Report, the IG Report, the Durham Report, and every official DOJ statement never concluded Trump was a Russian asset or a national security risk. You’re trying to replace official findings with punditry, book marketing, and chatbot quotes. That’s not evidence — that’s desperation.
How pathetic...you are worse than jerra b.
Your BBC link is a 2020 article reporting on one FBI official’s opinion, not a DOJ conclusion. The article itself admits Mueller did not establish conspiracy, did not conclude Trump was compromised, and did not label him a national security risk.