You said you didn't have info, I had just provided.Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ Again, I don't a **** what you TOLD me. I give a **** about what I SAID.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ You said you didn't have info, I had just provided.
It WASN'T "opinion"....Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Still not my words. AT THE TIME, I said neither of us had anything to back up any opinion. As a matter of fact,
LMAO! Keep stomping your feet.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-host- ... -revealed/Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ LMAO! Keep stomping your feet.
AT THE TIME you provided NOTHING that showed what was
Now you are reframing.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-host- ... -revealed/
July 19
FOX
Fox News host and Marine combat veteran Joey Jones criticized President Donald Trump’s Iran war strategy after two American service members were killed in an Iranian airstrike in Jordan on Friday. A third is missing in action.
That brings the number of U.S. military personnel killed in the Iran war to 16.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... SApp_Other
July 26
The Pentagon updated its official war casualty database over the weekend, adding more than 140 wounded service members. The Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS) also introduced a new casualty category labeled “Overseas Operations” for personnel killed and wounded “starting July 7”.
According to the updated database, the official toll for the earlier phase of the US-Iran war, known as Operation Epic Fury, now stands at 14 service members killed and more than 400 wounded in action.
Your sources suck.
That is why you are afraid to post what I said. You are caught in a lie.
@Blackvegetable Told you so.Huey » 02 Aug 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Thar she blows.....hello Mary.
Cowardly? Hello ROTC.
Neither one of us can prove any of those numbers. The honest way to mentioned it would be that originally 18 were reported killed but now it is reported as 14.
But we all know, ROTC, that you are not honest.
Tiny,
What is the date of the post?Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable Told you so.
AT THE TIME you provided NOTHING that showed what was being done. And I could not provide anything that said it wasn't. SO I guess your sources sucked also. But now that you finally have some semblance of truth the number was probably higher.
See how that works?
Try again, Liar.
If you can't see it, **** off. This ain't a court of law, you ain't a lawyer, and I am not playing your 20 questions ****.
I said said nothing that needed to be contradicted. At the time of the post I said neither of us could prove it one way or the other.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
I.posted the facts which directly contradicted you.
You called it "reframing"..
You're an idiot.
I see it.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ I see it...
Do you?
Does Aug 2nd precede or follow July 26?
Explain what you mean by "prove it"...Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ I said said nothing that needed to be contradicted. At the time of the post I said neither of us could prove it one way or the other.
You such a narcissist you have to declare some sort if victory when there really was no argument over facts.
Now you you are just **** spinning.
That's the point circle jerk..
What's the alcohol content?
I have citations showing the War Department providing a LOWER number, subsequent to announcing "18"...and offering a "rationale" one week BEFORE you boldly asserted that we had no "proof" they had done so.