Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:52 am

I have citations showing the War Department providing a LOWER number, subsequent to announcing "18"...and offering a "rationale" one week BEFORE you boldly asserted that we had no "proof" they had done so.

Coozie could Maintain  better totals..

What is the best flavor of dead?

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:52 am

I have citations showing the War Department providing a LOWER number, subsequent to announcing "18"...and offering a "rationale" one week BEFORE you boldly asserted that we had no "proof" they had done so.

 

But on the 2nd you did not post them.  You did not post them before the 2nd.  You did not post them until today.  So you provided NOTHING on the second to show the number was higher.  I didn't even argue the umber with you.  When I said you couldn't prove it YOU should have posted it.   You didn't

And what was my response after you finally posted it TODAY?  Is was OK...sure.

You didn't win anything nor did you lose anything.  

JohnnyYou » 06 Aug 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:50 am

That's  the point circle jerk..

Prove It!
 

 

Well, I hear he is pretty good being in the pivot man.
 

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:57 am

But on the 2nd you did not post them.  

Are these your words?

At the time of the post I said neither of us could prove it one way or the other.  

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:57 am

But on the 2nd you did not post them.  You did not post them before the 2nd.  You did not post them until today.  So you provided NOTHING on the second to show the number was higher.  I didn't even argue the umber with you.  When I said you couldn't prove it YOU should have posted it.   You didn't

And what was my response after you finally posted it TODAY?  Is was OK...sure.

You didn't win anything nor did you lose anything.  

 

@Blackvegetable   those are my words, in full, in context and with a link.

Try again.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 7:03 am

You said you didn't have info, I had just provided.

You only provide facts established by social consensus in history controlling current events 24/7.

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 10:40 am

@Blackvegetable   those are my words, in full, in context and with a link.

Try again.

Is that a "no"?

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 1:05 pm

Is that a "no"?

 

Huey » Today, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:57 am
But on the 2nd you did not post them.  You did not post them before the 2nd.  You did not post them until today.  So you provided NOTHING on the second to show the number was higher.  I didn't even argue the number with you.  When I said you couldn't prove it YOU should have posted it.   You didn't

And what was my response after you finally posted it TODAY?  Is was OK...sure.

You didn't win anything nor did you lose anything.  

Those are my words in full, in context, and with a link.  I am preventing the reframe you are you attempting.  

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 1:27 pm

Huey » Today, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:57 am
But on the 2nd you did not post them.  You did not post them before the 2nd.  You did not post them until today.  So you provided NOTHING on the second to show the number was higher.  I didn't even argue the number with you.  When I said you couldn't prove it YOU should have posted it.   You didn't

And what was my response after you finally posted it TODAY?  Is was OK...sure.

You didn't win anything nor did you lose anything.  

Those are my words in full, in context, and with a link.  I am preventing the reframe you are you attempting.

Are these your words describing your words?

At the time of the post I said neither of us could prove it one way or the other.  

 

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:36 am

I said said nothing that needed to be contradicted.  At the time of the post I said neither of us could prove it one way or the other.  

You such a narcissist you have to declare some sort if victory when there really was no argument over facts.

 

@Blackvegetable  

Here are my words in full and in context.


 

Huey » 02 Aug 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2026, 10:32 am

Thar she blows.....hello Mary.

Cowardly?  Hello ROTC.

Neither one of us can prove any of those numbers.  The honest way to mentioned it would be that originally 18 were reported killed but now it is reported as 14.

But we all know, ROTC, that you are not honest.

 

Ooops, @Blackvegetable  

You lose.
 

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm

Ooops, @Blackvegetable  

You lose.

Are these your words?

Neither one of us can prove any of those numbers.

Is the statement true?

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm

Ooops, @Blackvegetable  

You lose.
 


 

You mean from this post?
Huey » 02 Aug 2026, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑
02 Aug 2026, 11:32 am
Thar she blows.....hello Mary.

Cowardly?  Hello ROTC.

Neither one of us can prove any of those numbers.  The honest way to mentioned it would be that originally 18 were reported killed but now it is reported as 14.

But we all know, ROTC, that you are not honest.

These are my words from 2 aug.  You don't want to quote the entire post because the date shows I am right.  Just make your point without questions, Puss.  You lose. 
 

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 1:59 pm

But we all know, ROTC, that you are not honest.

 

Then answer the questions honestly.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 2:23 pm

Then answer the questions honestly.

 

Before answering I am making sure the words are from the right post.  You have a habit of cherry picking partial sentences.

Plus you refuse to answer clarification questions.  Your best bet is to stop thinking you are Matlock and just take a post and make a post.  When assholes like you use the quote function someone can't run from your words.

Do it right or bugger off.  
 

Huey » 06 Aug 2026, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 2:44 pm

Before answering I am making sure the words are from the right post.  You have a habit of cherry picking partial sentences.


 

You have a habit of saying context doesn't matter and retelling.

Ate they your words?

Are they accurate?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2026, 1:57 pm

https://www.thedailybeast.com/families- ... rumps-war/

One sailor on the USS Abraham Lincoln said, “The food is tasteless, and there’s not nearly enough, and they’re hungry all the time,” one community organizer trying to get packages to the afflicted fighters reported.

One image shows a dry patty, plastic-looking carrots, and a slab of processed meat on a plastic tray. Another now-viral image shows shredded meat and a single tortilla on a mostly empty tray.

https://youtube.com/shorts/9mdK9w1_VcU? ... mtvxYZlUzI_

Cats get cat food and dogs get dog food.

What should losers get?

Maybe if they stop getting whipped by a developing nation which has been starved and isolated for 30 years...
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2026, 2:32 pm

Let me add that Kennedy comes off like a real naif here...

He was merely speaking into our stupidity.

He was on safe ground.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2026, 6:38 pm

what did you eat "in theater"?

Wait....make that

What did you eat during your halo jump?

But the point is that The Department of War burned billions, before ensuring that they had enough to feed troops deployed.

You should demand that he define "food".
 

ROG62 » 18 Apr 2026, 12:53 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2026, 12:53 am

If they’re in the military, they know what to expect…

#mastergullible

Fake food?      

Losers.  

No offense to 'em. God double and triple bless our glorious gay troops.