Don't see your Level 1 precis.
You wouldn't know.Vegas » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is your job to provide thoughts of your own on your own **** OP.
Seriously? Jesus you are dense. The point is you chose to leave out the allegation that is the most serious.Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Point?Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Don't give a **** about that one.
That in of itself is the Husbands problem. If she did retaliate that is a problem.
You left out one that is also a problem. Where she is accused of having staff prepare "business" trips that were really personal travel.
You do realize that you are trashing the shot out of your own OP., right?
What do you believe this OP is about?Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Seriously? Jesus you are dense. The point is you chose to leave out the allegation that is the most serious.
**** security guard? Who cares.
And the **** with her husband was nothing towards her UNLESS it is proven she did retaliate.
Nod. Are we done?
Tell me what you believe you are doing.Vegas » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You do realize that you are trashing the shot out of your own OP., right?
You aren't saying anything meaningful. Just showing your cowardice post after post. Your thread is now a joke.![]()
![]()
![]()
The OP has nothing to do with what's "actionable"..Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I am not here to be questioned. I have commented on the OP. I am not here for your standard interrogation.
@Huey is a rat.. He is here for your wood fired pizza.Blackvegetable » Today, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ The OP has nothing to do with what's "actionable"..
Your comment is irrelevant
Johnny » wrote:@Huey is a rat.. He is here for your wood fired pizza.Blackvegetable » Today, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ The OP has nothing to do with what's "actionable"..
Your comment is irrelevant
I wish Doordash Grandma had grabbed him by the balls.
Tramp Grandma's For Trump..
What's with the double vague description?Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ At least have the balls to look at my first post concerning the OP and tell me what is wrong with it. Oh, and by the way, yesterday he called you a *******.
I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP. I took a stand on each allegation. As your usual you try to move the goal post. I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted. And I am Leary of you once again using PG.Blackvegetable » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑What's with the double vague description?Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ At least have the balls to look at my first post concerning the OP and tell me what is wrong with it. Oh, and by the way, yesterday he called you a *******.
Search is working.
You did not address the point of the OP..Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP. I took a stand on each allegation. As your usual you try to move the goal post. I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted. And I am Leary of you once again using PG.
Huey » Today, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously? Jesus you are dense. The point is you chose to leave out the allegation that is the most serious.
**** security guard? Who cares.
And the **** with her husband was nothing towards her UNLESS it is proven she did retaliate.
Nod. Are we done?
Call him Monica...**** security guard? Who cares.
I addressed what you wrote in the OP you ****** Princess. I am done with this thread. You know where to find me. Remember, unlike yuo I am not anonymous to you.Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You did not address the point of the OP..Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I commented strictly on what you posted in the OP. I took a stand on each allegation. As your usual you try to move the goal post. I am done with you unless you wish to discuss what I posted. And I am Leary of you once again using PG.
Again, it is not about any potential crimes...
It's about the Party of Family Values Posturing...