Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 6:52 am

Go ask him.

I already know it…

what Is it?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 6:51 am

She IS a woman, you **** idiot...

everyone knows that…well, except for kjb…
 

ROG62 » 22 Apr 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 9:51 am

FIFY…

#freethecling

Genuine historical document..


"Shoulder Triangulation!"


Genuine idiot.
 

JohnnyYou » 21 Apr 2026, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 1:03 pm

Oh, yeah..  So What?

NAACP sued the local town for discriminatory leadership.  The town settled, they said they would get some of the money back. The town got screwed and is in debt.   Maybe if they had tried to keep an Eye on the I in DE&I it would have never happened.

No, it wouldn't happen if you didn't let *** like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, extort your woke behinds.

ROG62 » 22 Apr 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 9:53 am

everyone knows that…well, except for kjb…

and you believe you "know" that better than any woman, JuCo?

https://youtu.be/ImHHKw8LMcM?si=9L6b2r-S8ELZokb7

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 7:46 am

RebelGator » 21 Apr 2026, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 7:12 am

On April 20, 2026, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a scathing solo dissent regarding a Fourth Amendment case (District of Columbia v. R.W.), stating she "[cannot fathom]" her colleagues' decision to intervene. The Court, in a 7-2 or 8-2 decision, reversed a lower court ruling, siding with police who stopped a driver without, according to Jackson, reasonable suspicion. 

Key Details of the Decision (April 20, 2026):

• Case Background: The case involved a Metropolitan Police officer who stopped a person ("R.W.") at 2 a.m. after seeing others flee a vehicle.
• The Decision: The Supreme Court majority ruled for the police, arguing the lower court did not properly consider the "totality of the circumstances".
• Jackson's Dissent: Jackson criticized her colleagues for using "summary discretion"—a fast-track process—to overturn a "factbound" decision by the D.C. Court of Appeals that found the stop violated the Fourth Amendment. 

The police received a report of a suspicious vehicle, when they approached, 2 occupants fled from the car, the car then tried to drive away with a car door open. When stopping the car, the officers noted a broken window and a destroyed ignition switch.....seems like a no-brainer, right? Not for the African Jungle Name Jurist....I wonder what color the bad guys were?

Why do you, an uneducated illiterate, presume to offer commentary?

The GOP spent decades nominating SCOTUS candidates from one specific and dwindling minority, with the aim of achieving a limited goal on behalf of a constituency of imbeciles.


 

 

Hey Standless Wonder, where is your stand on the case?

Huey » 22 Apr 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 10:35 am

Hey Standless Wonder, where is your stand on the case?

Start a thread

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 6:52 am

Genuine historical document...

What have you got?
 

Is that document centered on relative time theory and social evolving people believing now isn't eternity?

jerrab » 21 Apr 2026, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 12:55 pm

when you fill cabinet seats regardless of suitability...........................

No doubt you consider these mental patients as "suitable", huh?:





 Gee, what a surprise!
 

Zeets2 » 22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am

No doubt you consider these mental patients as "suitable", huh?:





 Gee, what a surprise!

no doubt you would applaud all babies born with birth defects

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

jerra b » 22 Apr 2026, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 2:17 pm

no doubt you would applaud all babies born with birth defects

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

person that believes anything beyond adapting in plain sight is possible doesn't doubt any hypothetical scenario life exceeds adapting since conception. every human soul only arrives after birth when educated to believe humans are exempt from actual evolving daily here.

that higher plane of evolution where a body isn't needed to think for yourself navigating time equally alive now.

Zeets2 » 22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am

No doubt you consider these mental patients as "suitable", huh?:





 Gee, what a surprise!

you love babies  born with birth defects.  I am not surprised. you are one hateful sob

------------------------------------------------------
German measles, or rubella, is a contagious viral infection causing a mild rash, low fever, and swollen glands. Primarily affecting children, it causes dangerous birth defects (Congenital Rubella Syndrome) if contracted during pregnancy. It is spread through coughing or sneezing. There is no cure, so treatment focuses on managing symptoms like fever and discomfort

Zeets2 » 22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 11:29 am

No doubt you consider these mental patients as "suitable", huh?:





 Gee, what a surprise!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Under the leadership of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., federal vaccine policy underwent significant changes in early 2026, though a federal judge recently blocked many of these overhauls in March 2026. Medical experts have specifically warned that these policies could lead to a resurgence of diseases like rubella, which is a leading cause of severe birth defects

RebelGator » 21 Apr 2026, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 7:12 am

On April 20, 2026, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a scathing solo dissent regarding a Fourth Amendment case (District of Columbia v. R.W.), stating she "[cannot fathom]" her colleagues' decision to intervene. The Court, in a 7-2 or 8-2 decision, reversed a lower court ruling, siding with police who stopped a driver without, according to Jackson, reasonable suspicion. 

Key Details of the Decision (April 20, 2026):

• Case Background: The case involved a Metropolitan Police officer who stopped a person ("R.W.") at 2 a.m. after seeing others flee a vehicle.
• The Decision: The Supreme Court majority ruled for the police, arguing the lower court did not properly consider the "totality of the circumstances".
• Jackson's Dissent: Jackson criticized her colleagues for using "summary discretion"—a fast-track process—to overturn a "factbound" decision by the D.C. Court of Appeals that found the stop violated the Fourth Amendment. 

The police received a report of a suspicious vehicle, when they approached, 2 occupants fled from the car, the car then tried to drive away with a car door open. When stopping the car, the officers noted a broken window and a destroyed ignition switch.....seems like a no-brainer, right? Not for the African Jungle Name Jurist....I wonder what color the bad guys were?

I look at her bio and think

"There but for the grace of genes goes Gator."
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 3:03 pm

I look at her bio and think

"There but for the grace of genes goes Gator."
 

that is an actual compliment of Gator..

jerrab » 22 Apr 2026, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 2:22 pm

you love babies  born with birth defects.  I am not surprised. you are one hateful sob

------------------------------------------------------
German measles, or rubella, is a contagious viral infection causing a mild rash, low fever, and swollen glands. Primarily affecting children, it causes dangerous birth defects (Congenital Rubella Syndrome) if contracted during pregnancy. It is spread through coughing or sneezing. There is no cure, so treatment focuses on managing symptoms like fever and discomfort

Oh, but it's OK with you if those vaccines themselves cause serious reactions to patients as the untested Covid vaccine did?
Apparently, you're completely in favor of those pharmaceutical companies insisting on and receiving government mandates like Biden did by outlawing cheap, effective drugs in favor of the vaccines they want to give you that makes them billions of dollars in new profit, aren't you?

How come it's ALWAYS about you stupid liberals giving government MORE power over you to force unnecessary mandates on everyone?  Didn't EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS vote to FORCE you to buy health insurance whether you wanted it or not, and it took President Trump to overturn Obama's mandate on that?

Use your empty **** head for once, will you please?!??!?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 4:13 am » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 4:13 am

Coozie,

You're willfully uninformed...I don't give a **** what you feel.

Wrong. You care deeply how I feel.

Your continued failed attempts to try to make me feel bad for years...
How do you explain that?

Deezer Shoove » 22 Apr 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 3:34 pm

Wrong. You care deeply how I feel.

Your continued failed attempts to try to make me feel bad for years...
How do you explain that?

your social consensus never feels guilty for governing by relative time logistics cradle to grave when living only happens per lifetime inhabiting space since conception to decomposed now.

that physical results chromosomes vs syllables by alphabets or oral conversation of ancestries existed so far pretending life exceeds adapting as displaced genetically here evolving one at a time, now.

DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 3:34 pm

Wrong. You care deeply how I feel.

Your continued failed attempts to try to make me feel bad for years...
How do you explain that?

Aaaaaand he's off!

Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2026, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 3:40 pm

Aaaaaand he's off!

and you are still on your pedestal of contextual superiority while genetically equally evolving in plain sight.