Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Family of 'suicided' reporter who exposed Clinton in 2016 comes forward with disturbing inside info
Family of 'suicided' reporter who exposed Clinton in 2016 comes forward with disturbing inside info
By Vegas
22 Apr 2026 4:21 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Today 1:24 pm
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So now both your "thoughts" and defense thereof are in the OP?
You're a **** idiot
If you are demanding a repost, then that requires an inconvenience tax. Pay up.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:29 pm
Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If you are demanding a repost, then that requires an inconvenience tax. Pay up.
I already reposted it.
**** idiot.
Today 1:29 pm
Then what are you whimpering about?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:31 pm
There are no thoughts...
Just a rehash of the citation from a **** source...
Today 1:33 pm
You literally just admitted that you reposted my thoughts.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There are no thoughts...
Just a rehash of the citation from a **** source...
You are one dumb mother ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:35 pm
Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There are no thoughts...
Just a rehash of the citation from a **** source...
I tell you what. Give me a question related to the OP, so I can defend it.
I can't read your mind...it's too light of reading.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:36 pm
I said I reposted the OP.Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You literally just admitted that you reposted my thoughts.
You are one dumb mother ****.
Which is ****.
You call it "thoughts"..
You're an imbecile...
Today 1:37 pm
Well if those words didn't come from me, then where did I copy/paste it from?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:39 pm
Sure...Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I tell you what. Give me a question related to the OP, so I can defend it.
I can't read your mind...it's too light of reading.
What precedent did the 2018 IG report on the matter cite as the reason federal prosecutors unanimously rejected the idea that Hillary should have been prosecuted?
Today 1:43 pm
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Sure...
What precedent did the 2018 IG report on the matter cite as the reason federal prosecutors unanimously rejected the idea that Hillary should have been prosecuted?
10/5/26. Time for you to dish what you take out. Coward.
I can't say I am surprised that you fell for that. Afterall, t's you. So....
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:45 pm
After which you will still owe 3 years...Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 10/5/26. Time for you to dish what you take out. Coward.
I can't say I am surprised that you fell for that. Afterall, t's you. So....
Today 1:46 pm
Today 1:46 pm
You owe almost 10 years: "Challenge."
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:48 pm
After "almost 10 years" you are still not nearly good enough...
Today 1:48 pm
You are not to fit to judge.Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ After "almost 10 years" you are still not nearly good enough...
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:50 pm
Today 1:52 pm
If you can prove you wrote it. Until then, let's see what AI has to really say about you:
BV gets busted lying again. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
So, I caught BV lying about the Trump in drag pic. I know. How unusual for BV to lie. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
What AI says about BV's pic of Trump in drag - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
(1) Ok BV. Come receive your whipping. Topic: Why Narcissists, like BV, Fail at AI" - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Today 1:53 pm
The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+).
The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt".
Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.
What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate... Are you?
The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt".
Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates.
What I do not remember is whether you are a university graduate... Are you?
Today 1:54 pm
No more than you have to prove you're you...
Today 1:57 pm
I couldn't care less if you believe I am me. You are the one that is crying over having to prove your authorship.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 4332 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 4305 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, RebelGator, MR-7, jerra b, murdock, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: ADmantX, GPTBot, curl/7, Nutch, Baiduspider, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Yahoo! Slurp, LCC, DuckDuckGo, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot