Liberal Forum

nefarious101 » 24 Apr 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 11:57 am

so....ever hear of a razor?

is that what your girlfriend uses? do you share?

take the piranha bath with your girlfriend and share the bleach drink.

jerra b » 24 Apr 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 1:16 pm

is that what your girlfriend uses? do you share?

take the piranha bath with your girlfriend and share the bleach drink.

Occam's razor.

nefarious101 » 24 Apr 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 11:57 am

so....ever hear of a razor?

ever hear of answering a question?


HOW IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

jerrab » 24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm

ever hear of answering a question?

HOW IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

It's quite clear, the State Constitution has laws governing the process. You would think Democrats were smart enough to follow the rules set forth.

Virginia Democrats’ redistricting resolution illegal due to technicality, judge finds | PBS News https://share.google/Y4Y01qOzjRN1hFEZd

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge ruled Tuesday that a proposed constitutional amendment letting Democrats redraw the state's Congressional maps was illegal, potentially foiling their efforts to pick up seats in the U.S. House in November.

 Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. wrote in a court order that lawmakers' proposed constitutional amendment was invalid due to a technicality under state law that says such proposals must be passed and published by the clerk's office at least three months before a general election.

In October, lawmakers advanced their mid-decade redistricting resolution less than a week before their statewide races.

The judge also said the Democratic-led legislature failed to follow its own rules in adding the redistricting amendment to a special session, calling that "a blatant abuse of power." As a result, he said, the amendment was invalid and void.
 
 

jerrab » 24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm

ever hear of answering a question?

HOW IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

you're a third worlder....you don't have the mental capacity to understand it or you already would

people can't understand things for you....you have to learn to understand things yourself

one thing to understand is that sex with goats isn't right no matter how much you like it

nefarious101 » 24 Apr 2026, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 3:27 pm

you're a third worlder....you don't have the mental capacity to understand it or you already would

people can't understand things for you....you have to learn to understand things yourself

one thing to understand is that sex with goats isn't right no matter how much you like it

no answer                                                                                                                

jerra b » 24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm

ever hear of answering a question?


HOW IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

Ever learn to navigate space one at a time equally alive since conception? Obviously not. You would understand the difference between adapting to the equal time alive situation 24/7, but you defend ideas of exception and exemption of your character's right to assume anything else is possible.

nefarious101 » 22 Apr 2026, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2026, 6:32 pm

cha-ching.....triggered the low IQ 3rd worlder

Crushing the Virginia voter scam was a BIG WIN for America

My Gawd, she's discovered the emoji buttons.

Fuelman » 24 Apr 2026, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 3:21 pm

It's quite clear, the State Constitution has laws governing the process. You would think Democrats were smart enough to follow the rules set forth.

Virginia Democrats’ redistricting resolution illegal due to technicality, judge finds | PBS News https://share.google/Y4Y01qOzjRN1hFEZd

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge ruled Tuesday that a proposed constitutional amendment letting Democrats redraw the state's Congressional maps was illegal, potentially foiling their efforts to pick up seats in the U.S. House in November.

 Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. wrote in a court order that lawmakers' proposed constitutional amendment was invalid due to a technicality under state law that says such proposals must be passed and published by the clerk's office at least three months before a general election.

In October, lawmakers advanced their mid-decade redistricting resolution less than a week before their statewide races.

The judge also said the Democratic-led legislature failed to follow its own rules in adding the redistricting amendment to a special session, calling that "a blatant abuse of power." As a result, he said, the amendment was invalid and void.

democrats have proven to be relentlessly feckless stopping at nothing for power…
 

RebelGator » 25 Apr 2026, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 6:31 am

My Gawd, she's discovered the emoji buttons.

roshie’s got competition…
 

ROG62 » 25 Apr 2026, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 7:36 am

democrats have proven to be relentlessly feckless stopping at nothing for power…
 

They only obtain power while power of suggestion governs how people behave cradle to grave life evolves between inception and extinction of current conceptions each generation gap added so far.

Stop teaching life exceeds adapting forward now. Relative time logistics is a tool weaponized by leaderships misleading fellowships in this atmosphere factually every day.

Institutionalized ideology constitutes people can perform in any character role they want economically as long a they follow rule of law typecasting ancestral lineages as races, generation gaps as creeds.

Follow the rule of law to see the patterns of social behavior in every society. Genetics follows a biological pattern of changing form while alive never changed any generation gap since inception of ancestral lineages native to this atmosphere..

Humanity mismanages humans every day, every reality here. Ancestries did it to their own generation gaps wishing life were more than eternally separated now hence the dawn of civilization and civic minds govern civil soles towards extinction defying the natural universal results here now.

Trying to conquer space and time by context over content methodologies.

jerrab » 24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2026, 2:21 pm

ever hear of answering a question?

HOW IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

idiot, they did not follow our states constitutional process to amend it.  Do you **** read up on a topic before talking about it?

Plus, the wording is sketchy.  GTF outta here.
 
 

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am

idiot, they did not follow our states constitutional process to amend it.  Do you **** read up on a topic before talking about it?

Plus, the wording is sketchy.  GTF outta here.

that is sketchy wording,

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 3:20 am

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am

idiot, they did not follow our states constitutional process to amend it.  Do you **** read up on a topic before talking about it?

Plus, the wording is sketchy.  GTF outta here.

that is sketchy wording,

 

Here is the ballot question:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?


As the judge said that is very misleading, implying it is unfair now.  It wasn't.  This is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.
 

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 8:19 am

idiot, they did not follow our states constitutional process to amend it.  Do you **** read up on a topic before talking about it?

Plus, the wording is sketchy.  GTF outta here.

what you are afraid of..............................  Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger, a Democrat, 


------------------------------------------

Trump, a Republican, had previously predicted that if Democrats win in Virginia, "it's going to be a disaster."Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger, a Democrat, said in a statement on X that voters "pushed back against a President who claims he is 'entitled' to more Republican seats in Congress."As we watched other states go along with those demands without voter input, Virginians refused to let that stand. We responded the right way: at the ballot box."States usually redraw their voting maps once every decade after new population data is released as part of the US Census.Texas became the first state to launch a mid-decade change, under pressure from Trump, setting off a race for other states to alter their maps to help their respective political parties.California voters approved new maps in a special referendum in November, giving Democrats an edge in five new districts.Other Republican-led states have changed their maps, too. North Carolina and Missouri also passed new maps that give the party an edge.Utah passed a new map with court-imposed districts that could give Democrats an advantage in one district.Virginia approves redistricting measure, boosting Democrats' hopes for midterm
 

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am

Here is the ballot question:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

As the judge said that is very misleading, implying it is unfair now.  It wasn't.  This is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

any voter who reads it would know it is to combat trump's grab for votes.
 

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am

Here is the ballot question:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

As the judge said that is very misleading, implying it is unfair now.  It wasn't.  This is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

what trump is afraid of---------------------


Historically, the party of the sitting president tends to lose House seats during the midterms. If Democrats win the House in this November's contest race, it will not only serve a blow to Trump's political agenda, but it could open him up to Democratic-led congressional investigations.

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 3:20 am

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am

Here is the ballot question:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

As the judge said that is very misleading, implying it is unfair now.  It wasn't.  This is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

any voter who reads it would know it is to combat trump's grab for votes.
 

 

Thank you for agreeing with me that this is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

Have a nice day.

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 9:15 am

Here is the ballot question:

Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

As the judge said that is very misleading, implying it is unfair now.  It wasn't.  This is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

when trump ordered mid decade redistricting then all states can do the same in the name of fairness.

Huey » 25 Apr 2026, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2026, 10:05 am

Thank you for agreeing with me that this is purely an attempt to interfere with the 26 and 28 elections in this state.

Have a nice day.

when trump ordered mid decade redistricting then all states can do the same in the name of fairness.