Liberal Forum

"The Supreme Court dealt a blow to race-based redistricting on Wednesday, finding that Louisiana's second black-majority congressional district was created in violation of the Constitution, but stopping short of gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act."

The "Voting Rights Act" never really was "Constitutional"... but was established during the 1950's-60's, during the time of REAL RACIAL tensions in America... and they were always expected to be removed, in time... It SEEMS RECENTLY however, it's been the Democrat Party FIGHTING to keep them in place... BUT, the justification, is NO LONGER Valid !!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/su ... r-AA220JD7

ConservativeWave » 29 Apr 2026, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2026, 11:47 am

"The Supreme Court dealt a blow to race-based redistricting on Wednesday, finding that Louisiana's second black-majority congressional district was created in violation of the Constitution, but stopping short of gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act."

The "Voting Rights Act" never really was "Constitutional"... but was established during the 1950's-60's, during the time of REAL RACIAL tensions in America... and they were always expected to be removed, in time... It SEEMS RECENTLY however, it's been the Democrat Party FIGHTING to keep them in place... BUT, the justification, is NO LONGER Valid !!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/su ... r-AA220JD7

Tennessee wants some of that action apparently.

After Supreme Court ruling, Blackburn, GOP allies push Tennessee map redraw

https://l.smartnews.com/p-7D45xjHO/3lc2zg
 

ConservativeWave » 29 Apr 2026, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2026, 11:47 am

"The Supreme Court dealt a blow to race-based redistricting on Wednesday, finding that Louisiana's second black-majority congressional district was created in violation of the Constitution, but stopping short of gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act."

The "Voting Rights Act" never really was "Constitutional"... but was established during the 1950's-60's, during the time of REAL RACIAL tensions in America... and they were always expected to be removed, in time... It SEEMS RECENTLY however, it's been the Democrat Party FIGHTING to keep them in place... BUT, the justification, is NO LONGER Valid !!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/su ... r-AA220JD7

"...the justification, is NO LONGER Valid !!"

I have maintained that new laws in general must be subject to a "sunset clause" by default.

To be permanently on the books, a law must be justified as a necessary forever law.
Or at the very least establish a date by which it MUST be revisited or automatically expire.
Make congress actually do some **** work for a change.

DeezerShoove » 30 Apr 2026, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2026, 7:07 am

"...the justification, is NO LONGER Valid !!"

I have maintained that new laws in general must be subject to a "sunset clause" by default.

To be permanently on the books, a law must be justified as a necessary forever law.
Or at the very least establish a date by which it MUST be revisited or automatically expire.
Make congress actually do some **** work for a change.

Sounds great for new Federal Laws but what about those already on the books?

AI:
There is no precise, official count of every distinct federal law on the books, but estimates generally suggest that over 300,000 federal laws and regulations with the force of law are currently active

At the current snail pace that Congress works at, revisiting these laws is impossible!
 
 

Fuelman » 30 Apr 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2026, 8:09 am

Sounds great for new Federal Laws but what about those already on the books?

AI:
There is no precise, official count of every distinct federal law on the books, but estimates generally suggest that over 300,000 federal laws and regulations with the force of law are currently active

At the current snail pace that Congress works at, revisiting these laws is impossible!
 

Your RIGHT...

I read an article a while back, that there are still laws on the books that still protect people from "HORSE" and "HORSE RELATED" restrictions...

THIS law (i.e. racial mandated congressional districts) was an offshoot of the REAL RACE related abuses of 70 years ago.. THEY have NOW seen their day!!  TODAY, "Race" is more a FABRICATED and IMAGINED transgression that SPRINGS from the minds of Liberal Democrats, but in REALITY is a NOTHING BURGER... today they a JUST ways for minority communities to CONTINUE to get satisfaction & benefits from past issues... BUT, ALL it does is to provide excuses for minorities to BLAME their own mistakes on... 

Bottom line... WE ALL make mistakes, but WE need to address and get past them... BLAMING EVERYTHING of "Race"...achieves NOTHING Positive !!