Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 May 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:40 am

Your claim is he got the CIB by being Combat Proximate.  

My way.


Your way leads to you.

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:43 am

My way.


Your way leads to you.

 

Your claim is he got the CIB by being Combat Proximate.  Post your source.

Your words which have been linked multiple times:

Meaning he was Combat Proximate, and heard something go "Boom." ....
making him about as qualified to be sec def as Corporal Klinger ...

Huey » 04 May 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:48 am

Your claim is he got the CIB by being Combat Proximate.  

My way, Tiny...

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:50 am

My way, Tiny...

 

Your claim is he got the CIB by being Combat Proximate.  Post your source.

Your words which have been linked multiple times:

Meaning he was Combat Proximate, and heard something go "Boom." ....
making him about as qualified to be sec def as Corporal Klinger ...

Huey » 04 May 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:53 am

Your claim is he got the CIB by being Combat Proximate.  

That is correct.


Meaning he was proximate to combat as it was defined in Iraqnam....

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:57 am

That is correct.

Meaning he was proximate to combat as it was defined in Iraqnam....

He is a **** ****** coward like you. Did you suck his dick also?

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:57 am

That is correct.


Meaning he was proximate to combat as it was defined in Iraqnam....

 

Post your proof.  I have posted mine that shows one has to be actively engaged in combat.  Not near, not hearing it, but in it.

 

Huey » 04 May 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 11:05 am

Post your proof.  I have posted mine that shows one has to be actively engaged in combat.  Not near, not hearing it, but in it.

No....

My way....

You have a record of gainsaying objective facts...
 

BV can't post proof, he has NONE

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 11:13 am

No....

My way....

You have a record of gainsaying objective facts...

Technically, I'm done once I posted my citations.

Post your proof.  I have posted mine that shows one has to be actively engaged in combat.  Not near, not hearing it, but in it.

Huey » 04 May 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 11:19 am

Technically, I'm done once I posted my citations.

Post your proof.  I have posted mine that shows one has to be actively engaged in combat.  Not near, not hearing it, but in it.

I've dealt with that.

FJB » 04 May 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 9:58 am

BV loves muslim and chink dick

Flap Job Baballia .. shut yo trap ******.
 

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 12:16 pm

I've dealt with that.

You have run your mouth but post no facts and citations.

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 10:57 am

That is correct.

Meaning he was proximate to combat as it was defined in Iraqnam....

Leftoids talking military is an oxymoron. The majority of service members/former service members, myself included, detest people like you. Stick to the areas of concern that lefties excel at. Things like waving gay flags at parades, huggin' trees, etc... 

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 12:16 pm

I've dealt with that.


 

I'll let the Army tell you:

2)  Be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat.
(a)  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or SF primary duty in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. The unit in question must be a brigade, regiment, or smaller size. For example, personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad of a cavalry platoon in a cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the CIB. Battle or CPC alone is not sufficient. The unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/Combat ... adge%20CIB

Go argue with them.
 

SouthernFried » 04 May 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 12:49 pm

Leftoids talking military is an oxymoron. The majority of service members/former service members, myself included, detest people like you. Stick to the areas of concern that lefties excel at. Things like waving gay flags at parades, huggin' trees, etc...

And I loathe stupid people....and service hyping REMFs..

Huey » 04 May 2026, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 12:22 pm

You have run your mouth but post no facts and citations.

no...I have taught you about unit citations and blanket cibs...

Thank me.

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 1:29 pm

no...I have taught you about unit citations and blanket cibs...

Thank me.


 

You have not taught me a thing.  There is no such thing as a blanket CIB.  You didn't even know what it was until I told you.
Repost:

I'll let the Army tell you:

2)  Be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat.
(a)  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or SF primary duty in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. The unit in question must be a brigade, regiment, or smaller size. For example, personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad of a cavalry platoon in a cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the CIB. Battle or CPC alone is not sufficient. The unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/Combat ... adge%20CIB

Argue with the Army.
 
 

Huey » 04 May 2026, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 1:33 pm

You have not taught me a thing.  There is no such thing as a blanket CIB.

Blanket CIB orders (Combat Infantryman Badge) are unit-level award orders that list all eligible infantrymen during a deployment, rather than requiring individual citations. They are commonly issued for operations where the entire unit meets eligibility, but require strict oversight to ensure all listed personnel are entitled. These lists are generally generated and verified by unit S1 sections and approved by commanders to authorize wearing the badge.

we're done now.

Blackvegetable » 04 May 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

04 May 2026, 1:37 pm

Blanket CIB orders (Combat Infantryman Badge) are unit-level award orders that list all eligible infantrymen during a deployment, rather than requiring individual citations. They are commonly issued for operations where the entire unit meets eligibility, but require strict oversight to ensure all listed personnel are entitled. These lists are generally generated and verified by unit S1 sections and approved by commanders to authorize wearing the badge.

we're done now.

 

No sir, far from it.  Where in your little description does it say you do not have to be in combat?  All that is saying is instead of writing a citation for each person who was in combat one order covers them all.  That does not mean the those who were not in a particular fight get one also.

Consider yourself schooled and go argue with the army.  NOW we are done.

I'll let the Army tell you:

2)  Be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat.
(a)  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or SF primary duty in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. The unit in question must be a brigade, regiment, or smaller size. For example, personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad of a cavalry platoon in a cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the CIB. Battle or CPC alone is not sufficient. The unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/Combat ... adge%20CIB