Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 May 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2026, 10:40 am

Not lying at all.  Name your source that says you get the CIB for being proximate to combat?  If your daughter is still there get her to explain this to you, ROTC.  You are a coward.

If your daughter is still there get her to explain this to you, ROTC. You are a coward.

Wow...

Totally Tiny.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:28 am

That's not a lie.



 

 

Then of course you can post the proof.

In order for your narrative to be true you have to change the definition of engaged in combat AND believe you that contrary to Regulation his commander awarded him the badge although he was not qualified.

Show the proof.
 

Huey » 03 May 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2026, 10:56 am

Here are more of YOUR WORDS. You realize you just demeaned a badge you dead alleged friend probably earned.  You claim he was in the 75th Ranger Battalion in Vietnam.  Too bad he is not alive to see a POS civilian disrespect the CIB, ya lying little prick.

You realize you just demeaned a badge you dead alleged friend probably earned. You claim he was in the 75th Ranger Battalion in Vietnam. Too bad he is not alive to see a POS civilian disrespect the CIB, ya lying little prick.

"Forgot to duck."

"Humbling"

No.....seriously...
 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:32 am

Then of course you can post the proof.

In order for your narrative to be true you have to change the definition of engaged in combat AND believe you that contrary to Regulation his commander awarded him the badge although he was not qualified.

Show the proof.

Post your definition of Combat.


 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:29 am

I have posted it when I replied to you.

No, coward..

Not by reference..

My words, liar.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:33 am

Post your definition of Combat.


 


 

AI Overview

In the US Army, being "engaged in combat" means actively participating in a physical confrontation, direct-fire fight, or tactical engagement with an enemy force to achieve a specific mission. This involves using direct/indirect fire to destroy or neutralize threats, adhering to Rules of Engagement (ROE) that authorize force based on hostile acts or intent
 

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:31 am

Wow...

Totally Tiny.

 

Nothing wrong with what I said.  It is compliment for her,  Meaning SHE is the brains of the family.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:33 am

"Forgot to duck."

"Humbling"

No.....seriously...
 

 

I did not come up with the "forgot to duck" medal.  I heard it from a Purple Heart awardee.  
 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:55 am

I did not come up with the "forgot to duck" medal.  I heard it from a Purple Heart awardee.

And I'm not the first to look askance at inflated resumes....

Huey » 05 May 2026, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:52 am

Nothing wrong with what I said.  It is compliment for her,  Meaning SHE is the brains of the family.

Why even go there?


 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 6:51 am

AI Overview

In the US Army, being "engaged in combat" means actively participating in a physical confrontation, direct-fire fight, or tactical engagement with an enemy force to achieve a specific mission. This involves using direct/indirect fire to destroy or neutralize threats, adhering to Rules of Engagement (ROE) that authorize force based on hostile acts or intent

If an IED goes off three blocks from where you are sitting eating Apple Jacks, are you in "combat"?

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:05 am

If an IED goes off three blocks from where you are sitting eating Apple Jacks, are you in "combat"?

Not in the CONTEXT of the CIB.  What else ya got.  You keep trying to demean the award.  You sound jealous and bitter.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:02 am

Why even go there?


 

 

Because you are an idiot that needs **** explained to you.

Huey » 05 May 2026, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:08 am

Not in the CONTEXT of the CIB.  What else ya got.  You keep trying to demean the award.  You sound jealous and bitter.

How the **** do you know?



That's how it was early on in OIF, it seems. I technically didn't qualify for the CIB according to regulations, but I was awarded it anyway due to blanket orders. As I said elsewhere in this thread, I even tried not wearing it a few times because I didn't feel I earned it, but I actually got in trouble for not having it on.


https://www.reddit.com/r/army/comments/ ... bat_badge/

Huey » 05 May 2026, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:10 am

Because you are an idiot that needs **** explained to you.

No....it is because you're a bitter loser, uncertain of the paternity of your kids.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:16 am

How the **** do you know?



That's how it was early on in OIF, it seems. I technically didn't qualify for the CIB according to regulations, but I was awarded it anyway due to blanket orders. As I said elsewhere in this thread, I even tried not wearing it a few times because I didn't feel I earned it, but I actually got in trouble for not having it on.


https://www.reddit.com/r/army/comments/ ... bat_badge/

 

His command **** up if he didn't qualify.  Now post your proof that Pete did not qualify.  We have hear crickets on that count.  Reddit?  LMAO!
 

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:18 am

No....it is because you're a bitter loser, uncertain of the paternity of your kids.

 

 
Ain't no denying my kids!  

Huey » 05 May 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:19 am

His command **** up if he didn't qualify.  

Unless he's lying, you've been lying.

Blackvegetable » 05 May 2026, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:22 am

Unless he's lying, you've been lying.

 

His command **** up if he did not qualify.

What you deleted:

Now post your proof that Pete did not qualify.  We have hear crickets on that count.  Reddit?  LMAO!

 

Huey » 05 May 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

05 May 2026, 7:20 am

 
Ain't no denying my kids!

Everybody Ping Pongs Cool, Sometime or other...
With exceptions to the rules...