The water park employees should not be forced to look at Burkini wearing Muslims.
Public money spent on private event? Waal, burn my town square Xmas tree...
The guy has spent his entire tenure as AG under indictment.
Fuelman » Today, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ The water park employees should not be forced to look at Burkini wearing Muslims.
NO WOOD!!!
Hope Abbot is on that...Fuelman » Today, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Isn't this special!!![]()
![]()
The head of a Texas Islamic group that rented out a taxpayer-funded waterpark for an event that was advertised as “Muslim only” runs a childhood education center with the exact same unfortunate ‘Learing Center’ typo first seen at an infamous daycare in Minneapolis
Abbot is governor, not AG - and you are not addressing the OP.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ The guy has spent his entire tenure as AG under indictment.
TThe jews cancelled town square Christmas trees 40 years ago.PlumHollow » Today, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Public money spent on private event? Waal, burn my town square Xmas tree...
My bad...Cannonpointer » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Abbot is governor, not AG - and you are not addressing the OP.
As usual.
The Nazi bar?Abbott announced the stance via X,
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ My bad...
Wrong member of the comedy team....
The Nazi bar?
Apparently, it hurts your ****** that muslims don't get special treatment in texas.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ My bad...
Wrong member of the comedy team....
The Nazi bar?
No....I find the idea of Abbott and Paxton running a state comical.Cannonpointer » Today, 1:17 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently, it hurts your ****** that muslims don't get special treatment in texas.
Yet the OP is about a very specific issue in that greatly stupid state.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ No....I find the idea of Abbott and Paxton running a state comical.
It's the Last Gasp of Texas Stupid.
MAGA is gonna need a wheelchair after the midterms in Texas.Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yet the OP is about a very specific issue in that greatly stupid state.
And as usual, you wish to divert to another conversation, rather than contribute to the thread.
And this is because your ****** hurts, and you know you lack the chops to defend that which abbot is attacking.
You cannot attack abbot's POSITION, so you attack abbot, and you hope that I will take the bait - that I will allow a hump like you to divert my thread.
OK.Cannonpointer » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yet the OP is about a very specific issue in that greatly stupid state.
And as usual, you wish to divert to another conversation, rather than contribute to the thread.
And this is because your ****** hurts, and you know you lack the chops to defend that which abbot is attacking.
You cannot attack abbot's POSITION, so you attack abbot, and you hope that I will take the bait - that I will allow a hump like you to divert my thread.
You don't know how things work in America? Cities are beneath states.Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ OK.
The place is city owned...
One might think it is up to the city....
Abbott has been playing theater on this issue for years...
The 1st Amendment issue can go directly to federal court....the state need not participate.Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You don't know how things work in America? Cities are beneath states.
If a city in a state violates the First Amendment, it is literally the duty of the state to step in.
Whom did YOU think accountable for this duty? The Boy Scouts? The SPLC? The Daughters of the American Revolution?
It already has, many times. Abbot is merely protecting the Court's calendar from idiots.Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The 1st Amendment issue can go directly to federal court....the state need not participate.