Liberal Forum

 
It's beginning to look a lot like Covid....
 

I bet @GHETTO BLASTER  is too busy with that shiny new 6 figure job in home building....

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... study-says

A paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that US-born male workers in heavily targeted industries like construction saw a decline in work due to President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.

The researchers saw no evidence that employers increased wages to attract US-born workers to fill roles, and found that foreign-born and native-born labor often complement rather than substitute for each other.

The study's authors found that US-born workers in immigrant-heavy industries were harmed by the immigration crackdown, with no evidence of positive effects on their labor market outcomes.

The Politics of Fee Fees
the Politics of hmmmmmm feelin' good...

https://youtu.be/GLzDFbGdL5M?si=5O9yj1vRpXMUbzD_
 

Areas that experienced particularly large increases in Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests saw a decline in work among US-born male workers, driven by those with a high school degree or less, the study found. The researchers also saw no evidence that employers increased wages to attract US-born workers to fill roles.


ibid.



Hole?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:09 am

 
It's beginning to look a lot like Covid....

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.


1. The usual shelters:

Shelter 2: Shifts the burden of proof
Shelter 6: No thoughts of his own. Thus, turns the conversation of you. 
 Shelter 10: Hides behind the PG threads. 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.

1. The usual shelters:

Given that you have the awareness of an anal wart,  you wouldn't recall the emphasis once placed on this number by protoMAGAts...

It's another one of those issues your media masters go to when their dire predictions about soshulism fail to pan out.

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Blah blah blah.....

Prediction fulfilled. Still no thoughts. QED. 

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Prediction fulfilled. Still no thoughts. QED.

Exsanguinate out of earshot.

Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Still no thoughts. 

1. Blame me for your lack of thoughts.

Blame yourself for your ignorance 

****** libs on the couch playing video games. Soy Boys.

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Blame yourself for your ignorance

Prove you aren't. Your OP, your job. 

Still no thoughts.

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Prove you aren't. Your OP, your job. 

Still no thoughts.

It's not my job to lift you from Level 0.16 to where I stand, like a colossus....

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

It's not my job to lift you from Level 0.16 to where I stand, like a colossus....

The usual shelters. God you are so easy. 

Shelter 2: Shifts the burden of proof
 Shelter 6: No thoughts of his own. Thus, turns the conversation of you. 

1. Continue with the same safe space. Still no thoughts.

Vegas » Today, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:57 am

The usual shelters. God you are so easy. 

1. Continue with the same safe space. Still no thoughts.

Sounds like taking a name in vain.

And it doesn't tell me why you're owed a free ride to a level you haven't attained..

ROG62 » Today, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:08 am

No thoughts, ****** GALLERY?? Colour everyone surprised…

And you wonder why, I'm sure..

Vegas » Today, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:05 am

Why are you?

I guess your standards don't apply to you.

I don't need any help from a 0.16...

Vegas » Today, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:21 am

You need all the help that you can get. Still no thoughts.

1. Continue to blame me. Still no thoughts.

I don't blame you...

You are what you is.
 

Has anyone tried to refute your numbers?

I.E., evn attempted to address the OP?

Cannonpointer » Today, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:48 am

Has anyone tried to refute your numbers?

I.E., evn attempted to address the OP?

StonK Market go up, so Orange Man gud 

Cannonpointer » Today, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:48 am

Has anyone tried to refute your numbers?

I.E., evn attempted to address the OP?

What's the point?  All BV has pointed out is the trend since 1948.

Of course, he doesn't include this information!

Employment Shift: As of February 2026, women held more jobs in the US than men for only the third time in history, a trend driven by structural shifts in employment and more men leaving the workforce.  Federal Reserve Economic Data | FRED | St. Louis Fed +5

Women in the labor force : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics https://share.google/E0itb0eXdVheka4L9
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:48 am

Has anyone tried to refute your numbers?

I.E., evn attempted to address the OP?

 Duplicate post