RebelGator » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You can’t earn a billion dollars,” stated U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) during a May 2026 interview on Ilana Glazer's It's Open podcast. She argued that fortunes of that scale are structurally unearned and instead built through systemic exploitation.
Kamala Harris's campaign and affiliated committees spent roughly $1.5 billion in just 15 weeks during the 2024 presidential race. The campaign maintained a high burn rate, averaging approximately $100 million in weekly spending after she became the nominee.
Yep, just another example of two of the Democrats best.....DeezerShoove » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So, you can't just buy an election.
You have to have at very least a candidate that's salable.
Think of the donors if that **** got in. She'd have owed a lot of "favors".
If I was a rich donor, I'd expect nothing less from a known cocksucker.
RebelGator » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ BV, you must have missed this thread, or is your silence an admission?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom RebelGator » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ BV, you must have missed this thread, or is your silence an admission?
To be happy for an hour take a nap. To be happy for life, end your misery today.Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable ALWAYS runs from threads he knows he'll get his *** KICKED!!
Which is pretty much any that are on the forum.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
*Roshambo » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ To be happy for an hour take a nap. To be happy for life, end your misery today.
Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Where did those 14 million "Angry" voters go from 2020 to 2024?? You know, the ones that HATED TRUMP SO MUCH THEY TURNED OUT IN MASSIVE NUMBERS in 2020.
Did they become UNANGRY in 2024??
Don't tell us about ovomit's election, we want ANSWERS, COCKBREATH!!
"You can run the best campaign. You can even win the nomination. And you can have the election stolen from you." - Hillary Clinton, 2016
Cannonpointer » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "You can run the best campaign. You can even win the nomination. And you can have the election stolen from you." - Hillary Clinton, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRYB6N8fBKQ
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I believe elections can be rigged and stolen.Cannonpointer » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "You can run the best campaign. You can even win the nomination. And you can have the election stolen from you." - Hillary Clinton, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRYB6N8fBKQ
What you saw was election deniers. You saw hillary say the election was stolen and the president was illegitimate.*Roshambo » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I believe elections can be rigged and stolen.
I don’t believe software changed the vote.
2020
The bottom line is that Democrats, businesses, etc. worked hard on getting the word out to vote; and not for Trump. People got out and voted to get Trump out of office.
Trump started his misinformation campaign that the 2020 election would be rigged as soon as he took office back in 2017, and would do everything he could to make sure he stayed in power. That included feeding the fears of his supporters.
Did you stop believing? Or is it just the case that your "principles" and your "red lines" are somewhat malleable - like a prostitute's, or like a partisan hack's?Election deniers need to be rounded up.
Let me clarify this. If you believe the TrumpCannonpointer » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What you saw was election deniers. You saw hillary say the election was stolen and the president was illegitimate.
Are these your words?
Did you stop believing? Or is it just the case that your "principles" and your "red lines" are somewhat malleable - like a prostitute's, or like a partisan hack's?
You either do or do not believe your own words. You get to eat your cake or have your cake.
Now, go get your shine box, and then eat your cake.
I do not subscribe to your racist theory that a geriatric white man in a diaper, hiding from cameras, got more votes that Barrak Obama in his prime.*Roshambo » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Let me clarify this. If you believe the Trump**** about voting machines manipulation of votes, you need to be rounded up. Quackery. Lies lies lies.
You need to acknowledge that Trump was not eligible for reelection after his involvement with the J6 insurrection. spectator
Been down this path with you…Cannonpointer » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I do not subscribe to your racist theory that a geriatric white man in a diaper, hiding from cameras, got more votes that Barrak Obama in his prime.
Run that **** at your next klavern meeting - I'm sure your fellow klansmen will appreciate it.
Thank you for acknowledging that you only believe REPUBLICANS who deny elections should be rounded up. DEMOCRATS doing it are fine - just fine.
And this is what defines you as a partisan hack with no genuine principles - just out-of-house soundbites and marching orders.
The man sure leans into that fold.. Humans will beat the racist kink someday... We have been working on it for 500 years.
That man might have some kind of memory problemJohnnyYou » Today, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ The man sure leans into that fold.. Humans will beat the racist kink someday... We have been working on it for 500 years.