Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

Who is the front runner on the Independent Party Primary for 2028? I didn't even know there was an Independent Party. I have heard of Libertarians,  The Green Party,  Maybe a few others.  But never have have I heard of an Independent Party. 

 People who run as independent don't depend on getting 32 Million Dollars injected nto a campaign to "steal" and election in Kentucky.

Massie will likely run as  Independent for the house seat that Israel just bought Ed Gillean for the Republican ticket. 

I get the feeling the third party for you is  a diaper change everyday old man.

Is that like getting 70mil injected into Spanberger’s attempt to stack the deck?
 

ROG62 » Today, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:18 am

Is that like getting 70mil injected into Spanberger’s attempt to stack the deck?

AIPAC is bipartisan.  As long as you love Israel your good.
 

JohnnyYou » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

AIPAC is bipartisan.  As long as you love Israel your good.

Israel, been kicking *** since May 14, 1948.

MR-7 » Today, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:11 am

What does this have to do with the fact that 3rd party voters don't even have a candidate and want to tell others how their legitimate candidate, is not doing a "good" job. This is all laughable.

Who SAYS the demico-republicrat candidates are "legitimate? What legitimizes them

They do the opposite of what they promised. You do not get what you voted for. How is that "legitimte"?

And your argument is for more of the same.

MR-7 » Today, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:11 am

I just want a 3rd party voter to tell us all what their candidate had to offer. There were two candidates in 2024. TRUMP and harris. If you don't like TRUMP, then you can vote for whoever the dems tell you to vote for.

And you don't understand that this is precisely the problem? That WHICHEVER candidate we are allowed to vote for is in the tank?

MR-7 » Today, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:11 am

Why, because there will be no 3rd party candidate in 2028, as usual. I am looking forward for the 2028 election. Rubio will get my vote if he runs.

Little Marco. How humiliating for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQXVijenLfE

RebelGator » Today, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:45 am

What happened to Kameltoe.....the San Fran Cock-Gobbler?

You voted for her, and she lost.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:19 pm

You voted for her, and she lost.

China is  at least a Uni Party..   Russia is a drag..

Gosh it sucks one of our submarines is missing and it is bye bye empire..  please buy buy..  Tomatoes up 40% YOY..  My plants are rocking! We Old Mack shunned the three dollar jumbos.

youtu.be/tf-8agXPdFU?si=oe6qwxWa3ejuUM3F (one of duh cums is missing....)
 
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:18 pm

Who SAYS the demico-republicrat candidates are "legitimate? What legitimizes them?

They do the opposite of what they promise. You do not get what you vote for. How is that "legitimte"?

And your argument is for more of the same.

And you don't understand that this is precisely the problem? That WHICHEVER candidate we are allowed to vote for is in the tank for the MIC and the mega-corps that are poisoning us and stealing our republic, leaving each generation with more hours to work for less reward?

Little Marco. How humiliating for you.

A candidate is legitimate because they

qualified for ballot access...met filing deadlines...submitted required signatures...formed a real campaign committee...met FEC requirements....and appeared on ballots nationwide. That’s legitimacy. Not a vibe. Not a theory. Not a manifesto. You’re demanding lectures about ‘legitimacy’ from a voting lane that has never even come close to winning anything. A 3rd‑party candidate hasn’t won a single state in over 50 years, and most of them can’t even win a county. You’re talking about a party that has never scored in modern political history.

A 3rd‑party candidate has not

won a presidential election   
won a single state since 1968 
come close to 270 electoral votes 
held a competitive national lead   

The closest anyone got in the last half‑century

Ross Perot, 1992 — 19% popular vote, 0 states
Ross Perot, 1996 — 8%, 0 states
Gary Johnson, 2016 — 3%, 0 states

Get back to me when a 3rd party candidate can win even one "COUNTY" in an election. Just one "COUNTY".

 
 

And let's not forget about Jill Stein...yes, Jill Stein ran. And like every other 3rd‑party candidate in modern history, she didn’t win a state, didn’t win a county, and didn’t come close.   

And another thing.....3rd‑party voters love acting like they’re the enlightened geniuses in the room, but every election cycle they proudly vote for candidates who are LOSERS. They "BRAG" about "REJECTING THE SYSTEM", by picking candidates who never win. No wins. No states. No counties. No momentum. No path. But somehow, they think they’re the ones who “get it.”

Voting for someone with a 0% chance of winning doesn’t make you deep. You don’t influence outcomes. You don’t build movements, and you don’t shift policy. You just show up every four years to write in a **** name. Ask them who their candidate was and you will get this Horse ****...the system...the corporations...and the elites.

Everything except a name. Because they don’t have one. 
 

MR-7 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

And another thing.....3rd‑party voters love acting like they’re the enlightened geniuses in the room, but every election cycle they proudly vote for candidates who are LOSERS. They "BRAG" about "REJECTING THE SYSTEM", by picking candidates who never win. No wins. No states. No counties. No momentum. No path. But somehow, they think they’re the ones who “get it.”

Voting for someone with a 0% chance of winning doesn’t make you deep. You don’t influence outcomes. You don’t build movements, and you don’t shift policy. You just show up every four years to write in a **** name. Ask them who their candidate was and you will get this Horse ****...the system...the corporations...and the elites.

Everything except a name. Because they don’t have one.

They had one in Ralph Nader but sadly enough mail-in ballots and voucher voting were futuristic fantasies. 

RebelGator » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

They had one in Ralph Nader but sadly enough mail-in ballots and voucher voting were futuristic fantasies.

With all the climate hysteria, you’d think the Green Party (Nader) would’ve finally won something...anything. A state, a county, a neighborhood, a cul‑de‑sac. But nope. Turns out even the people screaming about the planet didn’t trust the party named after it. That’s how unserious the 3rd‑party lane is. They are **** USELESS. Oh...Good Morning.

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

A candidate is legitimate because they

qualified for ballot access...met filing deadlines...submitted required signatures...formed a real campaign committee...met FEC requirements....and appeared on ballots nationwide. That’s legitimacy. Not a vibe. Not a theory. Not a manifesto. You’re demanding lectures about ‘legitimacy’ from a voting lane that has never even come close to winning anything. A 3rd‑party candidate hasn’t won a single state in over 50 years, and most of them can’t even win a county. You’re talking about a party that has never scored in modern political history.

Yes.

And you are incapable of seeing the reason for this is you.

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

A 3rd‑party candidate has not

won a presidential election   
won a single state since 1968 
come close to 270 electoral votes 
held a competitive national lead   

Nor will they, until your nuts drop.

MR-7 » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

The closest anyone got in the last half‑century

Ross Perot, 1992 — 19% popular vote, 0 states
Ross Perot, 1996 — 8%, 0 states
Gary Johnson, 2016 — 3%, 0 states

Get back to me when a 3rd party candidate can win even one "COUNTY" in an election. Just one "COUNTY".

In order for me to get back to you, I would have to know where you live.

You don't want that, you filthy ***.