Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
AI and jobs...I have a concern.
AI and jobs...I have a concern.
By Vegas
20 May 2026 10:40 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 May 2026 11:19 am
Always hiding. 3 damn times in one post. If that continues, I will need to do your numbers.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 11:20 am
I have a post graduate WRITING level, LOTS...
20 May 2026 11:21 am
What would the balance sheet look like if New York City vanished?Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Meaning the city gets some more of its own money back.
New York City receives 40.5% of New York State’s total operating expenditures, despite generating nearly 55% of all state revenues.Because of this revenue-to-spending disparity, NYC taxpayers contribute more to the state's coffers than the city receives in state funds, resulting in a net transfer of resources to other regions of the state.
Case closed, slam dunk, move along....you bore me with your junior varsity excuses.
20 May 2026 11:21 am
Are you now going to paste that AI opinion of what you claim was your writing...you know, the one that you refuse to prove that it came from you. Other than because you said so.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 11:25 am
Balance sheet?RebelGator » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What would the balance sheet look like if New York City vanished?
Case closed, slam dunk, move along....you bore me with your junior varsity excuses.
Where do you think the assets are located?
You have no idea what your yapping about.
20 May 2026 11:26 am
I don't have to prove authorship.Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Other than because you said so.
You have to disprove it.
20 May 2026 11:29 am
Right next to the liabilities......duh.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Balance sheet?
Where do you think the assets are located?
You have no idea what your yapping about.
20 May 2026 11:31 am
That’s not how authorship works.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't have to prove authorship.
You have to disprove it.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 11:34 am
You're a **** idiot...
It's generally below...
20 May 2026 11:38 am
Your *** is below, but it's still next to your brain.
20 May 2026 11:40 am
That is exactly how it works.Vegas » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That’s not how authorship works.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.
yea...and it would be very simple.Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove
Because you're a moron.
Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.
**** idiot.
20 May 2026 11:41 am
You remain an idiot...
20 May 2026 11:46 am
You just agreed with me.“If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.”Exactly.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That is exactly how it works.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.
yea...and it would be very simple.
Because you're a moron.
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.
**** idiot.
That was my entire point.
Everything after that was just you arguing with the Shakespeare joke because the actual argument already left the room with your wallet.
@Huey I genuinely believe he and Tavy are switching back and forth on his account. He literally just agreed with me. That means either he wasn't paying attention or Tavy wasn't keeping up on our conversation.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 11:53 am
That is NOT what I said, **** illiterate.Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You just agreed with me.“If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.”Exactly.
If you claimed to have written Hamlet, I would be obliged to contradict you with evidence.
A simple task given that you're a moron.
20 May 2026 12:03 pm
#hoodspeaklevel
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
20 May 2026 12:04 pm
Wonderful. So now you admit claims of authorship require evidence.Your Hamlet example is easy to contradict because Hamlet already has an established author. Your mystery “post-doc level” masterpiece does not.Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That is NOT what I said, **** illiterate.
If you claimed to have written Hamlet, I would be obliged to contradict you with evidence.
A simple task given that you're a moron.
So the question remains exactly where it started:You claimed you wrote it.
What evidence do you have?Insults are not citations.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 12:04 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
20 May 2026 12:11 pm
So, this conversation never happened:Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That is NOT what I said, **** illiterate.
If you claimed to have written Hamlet, I would be obliged to contradict you with evidence.
A simple task given that you're a moron.
That is exactly how it works.Vegas » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
39 minutes ago
That’s not how authorship works.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.Vegas
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.
yea...and it would be very simple.Vegas
Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove
Because you're a moron.
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.Vegas
Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now
**** idiot.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
20 May 2026 12:19 pm
That's a major concern, no doubt, especially when added to the inevitable facts of what these massive data centers are going to cost to the local communities they're built in. I can guarantee at least 3 ways they will damage the cities building them, one by the massive amount of electricity they'll require, which will increase rates for anyone living near them, two, by the massive volume of water that's needed for them when there are already data centers that have caused dangerously low water pressure in their area, and three is the kind of added traffic that will be generated all around the area.Vegas » Today, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ There isn't enough data out yet, but there are definitely examples of employees being laid off by the 1000s across the country, due to AI taking over their duties. Not just blue collar jobs, but professional employment as well. AI can code better than any programmer, no matter how many years of experience they have. It can design better than engineers, it can replace writers, editors, accountants, finance analyzers, educators, clinical support, management and operations, journalism (thank God), and even therapists.
That is just the professional industries. There will be advanced robotic systems to handle the hands-on nitty gritty jobs soon.
So my concern is that if people are not working, then how will the country attain its tax revenue? The government may tax the same companies that have more AI implementation, but that won't solve anything. Usually, when new tech comes about, when jobs are lost, new industries emerge, and it balances back out. However, any new industry emerging will be AI itself. So then what?
Question: how will the country sustain its tax revenue with so many jobs gone, as AI emerges more into mainstream?
Personally, I don't see the huge positive potential that they'll provide, and it always scares me when these obvious problems are covered up until it's too late!
20 May 2026 12:22 pm
Exactly. Some of the communities these data centers are in have complained about the noise pollution. There is 24/hr buzzing and humming noise. Some people feel dizzy and can't sleep.Zeets2 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's a major concern, no doubt, especially when added to the inevitable facts of what these massive data centers are going to cost to the local communities they're built in. I can guarantee at least 3 ways they will damage the cities building them, one by the massive amount of electricity they'll require, which will increase rates for anyone living near them, two, by the massive volume of water that's needed for them when there are already data centers that have caused dangerously low water pressure in their area, and three is the kind of added traffic that will be generated all around the area.
Personally, I don't see the huge positive potential that they'll provide, and it always scares me when these obvious problems are covered up until it's too late!
I think AI is amazing, but the cost appears to outweigh the benefits.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 4288 users online :: 10 registered, 19 bots, and 4259 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, MR-7, Beekeeper, johnedgarslowhorses, Deezer Shoove, sole
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Bolt, Firefox/7.0, Not, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Adsbot, Kinza, Yahoo! Slurp, NING, Baiduspider, YandexBot, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot