No..
Nope. Not what you said. Here is the proof of your stupidity. In all its glory:Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No..
I said claims of plagiarism require evidence.
You're a **** moron.
That is exactly how it works.Vegas » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
39 minutes ago
That’s not how authorship works.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.Vegas
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.
yea...and it would be very simple.Vegas
Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.Vegas
Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now
It happened...your retelling didn't.Vegas » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So, this conversation never happened:
That is exactly how it works.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.
yea...and it would be very simple.
Because you're a moron.
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.
**** idiot.
You don't even read your own ****..Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nope. Not what you said. Here is the proof of your stupidity. In all its glory:
That is exactly how it works.
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.
yea...and it would be very simple.
Because you're a moron.
If you wrote it, it would change authorship, not your identity.
**** idiot.
.yea...and it would be very simple.Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.
No retelling. I copied it directly. Here it is again. Enjoy.
Vegas » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
39 minutes ago
That’s not how authorship works.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
Blackvegetable
That is exactly how it works.
Vegas
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.
Blackvegetable
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.
Vegas
Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove
Blackvegetable
yea...and it would be very simple.
Because you're a moron.
Vegas
Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now
Give serious thought to killing yourself.
Stay on message doesn't teach ancestors how to adapt in time living in series parallel positions since conception. Reality educates ancestors to perform as typecast people dying to stay in their stereotypical social order designed by persons in each generation forward taking advantage of reasonable doubt how time works life in plain sight.Vegas » Today, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ There isn't enough data out yet, but there are definitely examples of employees being laid off by the 1000s across the country, due to AI taking over their duties. Not just blue collar jobs, but professional employment as well. AI can code better than any programmer, no matter how many years of experience they have. It can design better than engineers, it can replace writers, editors, accountants, finance analyzers, educators, clinical support, management and operations, journalism (thank God), and even therapists.
That is just the professional industries. There will be advanced robotic systems to handle the hands-on nitty gritty jobs soon.
So my concern is that if people are not working, then how will the country attain its tax revenue? The government may tax the same companies that have more AI implementation, but that won't solve anything. Usually, when new tech comes about, when jobs are lost, new industries emerge, and it balances back out. However, any new industry emerging will be AI itself. So then what?
Question: how will the country sustain its tax revenue with so many jobs gone, as AI emerges more into mainstream?
Busted your ***.
Vegas » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
39 minutes ago
That’s not how authorship works.
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it. Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove it.Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now.
Blackvegetable
That is exactly how it works.
Vegas
If you claim you wrote something, the burden is on you to show you wrote it.
Blackvegetable
That's so stupid, only you would assert it.
Vegas
Otherwise, I hereby claim I wrote Hamlet, and you have to disprove
Blackvegetable
yea...and it would be very simple.
Because you're a moron.
Vegas
Congratulations. I’m Shakespeare now
There is an article released today that the AI Bubble is real. Money is being borrowed to build it.
You.mean this kind of evidence?
First coined on this forum by yours truly.....you want the exact date?Blackvegetable
You remain an idiot.
Sure.RebelGator » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You.mean this kind of evidence?
First coined on this forum by yours truly.....you want the exact date?
it’s actually a #notsocoolio problem…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom