Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:19 pm

I offered no opinion. If you have a problem with the information posted you will have to take it up with NPR. I did it this way on purpose to avoid the usual ****. If you wish to make something more of it you should ask questions instead of making wild guesses. Causes less problems. But it is problems you wish to cause, isn't it? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/6912

Phone: 603-890-2000

Should I call that number and report that you are having a serious mental breakdown and may be a danger to yourself or other? 
 
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Phone: 603-890-2000

Should I call that number and report that you are having a serious mental breakdown and may be a danger to yourself or other?

You'd have to explain why you believe so.

Your assertions won't suffice..
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Phsycho, you have said nothing that shows I lost anything.  Epic thread fail.  You can't say what this alleged "gotcha is about.

There is already a couple of threads about that, Psycho.  But once again I thank you for showing how correct I am about the track.

@Vegas   I think I broke BV again.
 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

No you haven't.  You copied and pasted a 12 year old post with no context or saying what your point is.

So I will keep laughing, Psycho.

You have asserted that context is irrelevant. 


 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

There is already a couple of threads about that, Psycho.  But once again I thank you for showing how correct I am about the track.

@Vegas   I think I broke BV again.

This is about you, and your vision thing.

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

No you haven't.  You copied and pasted a 12 year old post with no context or saying what your point is.

So I will keep laughing, Psycho.

You have asserted that context is irrelevant. 


 

 

I did once in a vert specific conversation, Psycho.  Should I call this number, stalker:Phone: 603-890-2000 
 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

There is already a couple of threads about that, Psycho.  But once again I thank you for showing how correct I am about the track.

@Vegas   I think I broke BV again.

Correct about what?

That which you refuse to post?

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

There is already a couple of threads about that, Psycho.  But once again I thank you for showing how correct I am about the track.

@Vegas   I think I broke BV again.

I think you broke him yesterday. Today is just the ruins. 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

There is already a couple of threads about that, Psycho.  But once again I thank you for showing how correct I am about the track.

@Vegas   I think I broke BV again.

This is about you, and your vision thing.

 

603-890-2000

Make your case. 

 

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Phone: 603-890-2000

Should I call that number and report that you are having a serious mental breakdown and may be a danger to yourself or other?

Man, you are treading in quick sand..   You are threatening SWATing people?  WTF, it's just a **** discussion forum.
 

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I did once in a vert specific conversation, Psycho.  Should I call this number, stalkerhone: 603-890-2000

So you're suggesting that the comment

"Context doesn't matter"

only applies in context?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

That which you refuse to post?

Kind of like how you refuse to answer questions after being asked once. 


1. Pic...you know the drill. Will you ever even make an effort to prove that you answered the first time? And **** your prove a negative.

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 5:55 am

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Phone: 603-890-2000

Should I call that number and report that you are having a serious mental breakdown and may be a danger to yourself or other?

Man, you are treading in quick sand..   You are threatening SWATing people?  WTF, it's just a **** discussion forum.
 

 

Asshole, stop taking everything so literally.  I am jerking his chain.  While he knows my name I don't know his.  I guess I could call them and say "do you remember the idiot that claims he was pepper sprayed in his own driveway?

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Kind of like how you refuse to answer questions after being asked once. 


 

Neither of you answer questions at all.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Neither of you answer questions at all.

It's reciprocation. If you don't answer ours, then we are under no obligation to answer yours, narcissist boy. 
 

JohnnyYou » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Man, you are treading in quick sand..   You are threatening SWATing people?  WTF, it's just a **** discussion forum.

I just posted it again on the other thread Psycho. Seems you are running and reframing.  

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

So you're suggesting that the comment

"Context doesn't matter"

only applies in context?

Post the link and the entire conversation.  You won't because as usual I am right.

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Not this **** again.

Your statement stands on its own 

If you insist it doesn't, that's YOUR case to make.

Who is Quimmie?

These nut jobs constantly point out the predecessors were **** so they have every right to be worse.  There is a word for it I bet.  
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:19 pm

I offered no opinion. If you have a problem with the information posted you will have to take it up with NPR. I did it this way on purpose to avoid the usual ****. If you wish to make something more of it you should ask questions instead of making wild guesses. Causes less problems. But it is problems you wish to cause, isn't it? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/6912

2 tribute threads in less than 24 hours.  I'm honored

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I just posted it again on the other thread Psycho. Seems you are running and reframing.

What are you talking about? I just got on..  

I filled up at 4.19 and 99/100  Essentially $4.20.   97$... With any luck it will get me through till August.