Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:32 am

Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?

what?? You mean A QUESTION??

Nah, not going to happen.

Beekeeper » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

what?? You mean A QUESTION??

Nah, not going to happen.

Of course not..

You're christian cowards.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:32 am

Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?

Ego in a weak assed attempt to sugarcoat the failed conviction and award basis…

it’s a turd, brown, no matter how much you lick and polish it…

ROG62 » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Ego in a weak assed attempt to sugarcoat the failed conviction and award basis…

it’s a turd, brown, no matter how much you lick and polish it…

Ego in a weak assed attempt to sugarcoat the failed conviction and award basis…

it was a civil case. It pits a "Plaintiff" against a "Respondent"....the outcome is determined by a jury.

There's no "conviction" involved, and the judge can't "fail"...he can be reversed.

The Plaintiff prevailed. The award exceeded the "standard" by a factor of more than 5.

You're as **** stupid as @Beekeeper  


 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:32 am

it was a civil case. It pits a "Plaintiff" against a "Respondent"....the outcome is determined by a jury.

There's no "conviction" involved, and the judge can't "fail"...he can be reversed.

The Plaintiff prevailed. The award exceeded the "standard" by a factor of more than 5.

You're as **** stupid as @Beekeeper

so you’re clinging to “standard”?       

is it a legal guideline written into the annals of the halls of awards? NO! I can guarantee you the jury WAS NOT told what the “standard” was as it’s **** arbitrary…

that’s like the weather people whining or gloating about being above or below normal…WGAFF? where in the **** do you think they come from?       

GD your stupid hurts…
 
 

ROG62 » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

so you’re clinging to “standard”?       

is it a legal guideline written into the annals of the halls of awards? NO! I can guarantee you the jury WAS NOT told what the “standard” was as it’s **** arbitrary…

that’s like the weather people whining or gloating about being above or below normal…WGAFF? where in the **** do you think they come from?       

GD your stupid hurts…

You know where I found this?


 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

You know where I found this?

In your jack-off material?

RebelGator » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

In your jack-off material?

The local news ran this story..  Amazing.. Usually they just stick to the weather.

It was a 4 minute slot at most and is done and gone here.  You'll thank me if Moore don't get Four More.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:47 pm

You know where I found this?

no…nor do I care…

ROG62 » Yesterday, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:19 pm

so you’re clinging to “standard”?       

is it a legal guideline written into the annals of the halls of awards? NO! I can guarantee you the jury WAS NOT told what the “standard” was as it’s **** arbitrary…

that’s like the weather people whining or gloating about being above or below normal…WGAFF? where in the **** do you think they come from?       

GD your stupid hurts…

The part ****-for-brains fails to admit is that Kaplan SAID IN HIS RULING that the JURY DID NOT FIND A RAPE OCCURRED!! So anything he said BEYOND THAT is nothing but Kaplan's BIASED OPINION and nothing more!! Yet, Cupcake wants to blow that into "Trump's a rapist" and all that does is PROVE the stupid the flows from the loins of that piece of ****!! I would bet she superglues his/her piss flaps together every day so she can miserable all day and use that to garner more anger in his life.

Beekeeper » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

The part ****-for-brains fails to admit is that Kaplan SAID IN HIS RULING that the JURY DID NOT FIND A RAPE OCCURRED!! So anything he said BEYOND THAT is nothing but Kaplan's BIASED OPINION and nothing more!! Yet, Cupcake wants to blow that into "Trump's a rapist" and all that does is PROVE the stupid the flows from the loins of that piece of ****!! I would bet she superglues his/her piss flaps together every day so she can miserable all day and use that to garner more anger in his life.

Hate is your Honey...  Buzz off into your Trump Hive ...

Grewt Up!

youtu.be/JCD7F7C8qe4?si=HIYQhrWciffJ5Zb-
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 11:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:28 pm

no…nor do I care…

Then take the L and keep your uninformed whining to yourself. 

Beekeeper » Today, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:56 am

The part ****-for-brains fails to admit is that Kaplan SAID IN HIS RULING that the JURY DID NOT FIND A RAPE OCCURRED!! So anything he said BEYOND THAT is nothing but Kaplan's BIASED OPINION and nothing more!! Yet, Cupcake wants to blow that into "Trump's a rapist" and all that does is PROVE the stupid the flows from the loins of that piece of ****!! I would bet she superglues his/her piss flaps together every day so she can miserable all day and use that to garner more anger in his life.

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's ruling.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:44 am

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's ruling.

"The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law"


Sucks, for you, huh, CUPCAKE!! Your OWN WORDS kick your *** again!!

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:44 am

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's ruling.

Mryland has red edges..  I live in one... And I could give a **** about this story.

Seventeen of Maryland’s 24 sheriffs, represented by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), filed a federal class-action lawsuit against the state to block the recently passed Community Trust Act.Key Details of the Lawsuit and ActThe Lawsuit: Filed in U.S. District Court, the sheriffs name Gov. Wes Moore and Attorney General Anthony Brown as defendants. The lawsuit claims the act is an unconstitutional overreach that violates the Supremacy Clause and interferes with federal immigration enforcement.The Community Trust Act: The emergency legislation was fast-tracked by the Maryland General Assembly and allowed to become law by Gov. Wes Moore without his signature. It heavily restricts state and local law enforcement from assisting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).Core Restrictions:Bars local authorities from holding undocumented individuals beyond their release date or honoring ICE detainers without a judicial warrant.Prohibits local corrections deputies from asking detained individuals about their immigration status.Effectively ends formal \(287(g)\) agreements between local agencies and federal immigration agents across the state.Exceptions: Local police and sheriff's departments are still permitted to notify ICE if a detainee is a convicted felon, a registered sex offender, or has served extensive time in prison.Local Impact and Sheriffs' StanceSupporters of the Lawsuit: Sheriffs from jurisdictions like Frederick, Harford, and the Eastern Shore (e.g., Dorchester, Wicomico, Worcester) argue the act "kneecaps" them, claiming it threatens public safety by forcing the release of criminal offenders who could otherwise be transferred to ICE custody.State Stance: Proponents of the act and the Attorney General’s office counter that the law does not obstruct federal enforcement but rather establishes necessary due process protections and prevents local police from acting as federal immigration agents.The sheriffs are asking a federal judge to issue an injunction and halt the act’s enforcement before its provisions take full effect.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:44 am

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's ruling.

And in case you missed it, a JUDGE cannot change the LAW in the middle of a case regardless of what he wants, thinks, or writes. ANYTHING he opines on OTHER than what the law says, is HIS **** OPINION, NOT LAW!!

TRUMP WAS NOT FOUND GUILTY OF RAPE, DICKSUCKER!!

Awwwww. Poor little CUPCAKE!! YOU LOSE AGAIN!!

Beekeeper » Today, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:17 pm

And in case you missed it, a JUDGE cannot change the LAW in 

You haven't read either the petition, or Kaplan's response.

Just shut the **** up.

Beekeeper » Today, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:14 pm

"The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law"

Sucks, for you, huh, CUPCAKE!! Your OWN WORDS kick your *** again!!

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's opinion.

You can shut the **** up now.
 

Blackvegetable » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

You haven't read Judge Kaplan's opinion.

You can shut the **** up now.

I JUST QUOTED IT, ASSHOLE!!

Now, YOU can shut the **** up, Cupcake!!

Got your *** handed to you once AGAIN today!! I bet you need a lot of bandages on those bloody, mincemeat *** cheeks tonight!!

Blackvegetable » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

You haven't read either the petition, or Kaplan's response.

Just shut the **** up.

Awww, what's the matter cupcake. YOU didn't like KAPLAN'S WORDS??

Poor thing.