And the bit you chose makes clear that you haven't.
This was a civil procedure...civil matters resolve Liability, not Guilt.TRUMP WAS NOT FOUND GUILTY OF RAPE, DICKSUCKER!!
RapeBeekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Awww, what's the matter cupcake. YOU didn't like KAPLAN'S WORDS??
Poor thing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”
“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
I struggle to believe that people this stupid exist.
They just want in on the 200 billion dollar ICE boondoggle.ROG62 » 28 May 2026, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ Maryland sheriffs filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against a new state law that forbids them from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.
Seventeen of Maryland’s 23 sheriffs joined the legal challenge against the Community Trust Act, which prohibits state and local law enforcement from contacting Border Patrol and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents about illegal immigrants jailed on criminal charges.
The law also requires federal authorities to secure a warrant before local agencies can transfer custody of an illegal immigrant.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... n-federal/
well johnny, at least there seems to be some remaining sanity in Maryland…what say you?
Their daddies raped them in their prescence...*Roshambo » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ These MAGA supporters do not regard rape with the seriousness it deserves. Their daddies raped their mommas in their presence, and the daddies described it as foreplay.
Much akin to an Arkansas male idea of foreplay "sis you up"
Who is Eugene Stoner??Beekeeper » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Awww, what's the matter cupcake. YOU didn't like KAPLAN'S WORDS??
Poor thing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
prescence - word not found?
Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”
“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
False..
That line of questioning died quickly.
I had to read it three times
Why? Because I couldn’t give a flying **** where you found it?Blackvegetable » Today, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ Then take the L and keep your uninformed whining to yourself.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No....because it makes a loser of you.ROG62 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why? Because I couldn’t give a flying **** where you found it?
#****
Exactly…Beekeeper » Today, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ The part ****-for-brains fails to admit is that Kaplan SAID IN HIS RULING that the JURY DID NOT FIND A RAPE OCCURRED!! So anything he said BEYOND THAT is nothing but Kaplan's BIASED OPINION and nothing more!! Yet, Cupcake wants to blow that into "Trump's a rapist" and all that does is PROVE the stupid the flows from the loins of that piece of ****!! I would bet she superglues his/her piss flaps together every day so she can miserable all day and use that to garner more anger in his life.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ False..
It found insufficient evidence that Grifty had penetrated the victim with his penis.
It did find Grifty liable for penetrating the victim.