Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I'm getting where contesting his dumbassery is futile.

I also post on the forum he was banned from.  His buddies are the same way.  When presented with facts that crush their comments they run, lie or stick with it.

Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

Nobody begged you to stalk me in this thread.  You entered of your own free will.

The Perils of @*TinyVictim

Huey » Today, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:38 am

Now here is a tactile weapon that I have:



Design in the early 1860 and designed for combat. Suck it.

Now here is a tactile weapon that I have:

:die:  

Huey » Yesterday, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:05 pm

As many know the lying democrat Gov of Va signed an AR ban that goes into effect 1 Jul.  It bans not based function but appearance.  I own one of these:


It is banned based solely on appearance.  DOesn't fire 223 or 556.  It is a **** shotgun.

Well, have no fear. Our forum self-proclaimed expert in guns will justify it so it makes perfect sense. 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

Nobody begged you to stalk me in this thread.  You entered of your own free will.

The Perils of @*TinyVictim

 

Victim?   

There is no context where you can make me a victim.  

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Oh my god!  I made a typo!  Banish me!  Like you never have one.  Do you understand that the AR 12 Is not a tactical weapon?

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Huey » Yesterday, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:05 pm

As many know the lying democrat Gov of Va signed an AR ban that goes into effect 1 Jul.  It bans not based function but appearance.  I own one of these:


It is banned based solely on appearance.  DOesn't fire 223 or 556.  It is a **** shotgun.

Well, have no fear. Our forum self-proclaimed expert in guns will justify it so it makes perfect sense. 

 

That same guy thinks that weapon is a tactical weapon.  What a *******.

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

That same guy thinks that weapon is a tactical weapon.  What a *******.

But...but...but it looks scary. So therefore it must be a tactile weapon. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:36 am

Huey » Yesterday, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:05 pm

As many know the lying democrat Gov of Va signed an AR ban that goes into effect 1 Jul.  It bans not based function but appearance.  I own one of these:


It is banned based solely on appearance.  DOesn't fire 223 or 556.  It is a **** shotgun.

 Why do you need a Tactical X shotgun?


 

 

Bth of those weapons are capable of holding a 30 round magazine.  Both are semiautomatic.  Both fire the 223 or the 556.  They are the same weapon.  Yet one is legal and one is not.  Can you tell us why?

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Victim?   

There is no context where you can make me a victim.

Every single one, Sheilagh...

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Bth of those weapons are capable of holding a 30 round magazine.  Both are semiautomatic.  Both fire the 223 or the 556.  They are the same weapon.  Yet one is legal and one is not.  Can you tell us why?

I'd have to care.



 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Victim?   

There is no context where you can make me a victim.

Every single one, Sheilagh...

 

   

You would have to leave your safe space, SnowFlake.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Bth of those weapons are capable of holding a 30 round magazine.  Both are semiautomatic.  Both fire the 223 or the 556.  They are the same weapon.  Yet one is legal and one is not.  Can you tell us why?

I'd have to care.



 

 

You care enough to stalk 2A supporters on this forum and question there desire to own particular weapons.  You pretend you are speaking of firearms and laws as if you are an expert but you know very little.

When it come to function and firepower those two weapons are exactly the same.  You you idiots ban one based on external appearance.

And you call me a **** moron.  

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

You care enough to stalk 2A supporters on this forum and question there desire to own particular weapons.  You pretend you are speaking of firearms and laws as if you are an expert but you know very little.

When it come to function and firepower those two weapons are exactly the same.  You you idiots ban one based on external appearance.

And you call me a **** moron.

You care enough to stalk 2A supporters on this forum and question there desire to own particular weapons

Illiterate @*TinySnowflake, please..

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:46 am

Eskimos don't ski.
Run, CowardRebel.

         
 

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

   

You would have to leave your safe space, SnowFlake.

You'd have to acknowledge your words, answer questions and quit sobbing. 

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

****, that is not really a tactical shotgun.  It is a JTS AR 12 that hold only 4 rounds in the magazine.  And it is heavy,  It is mostly for hunting and fun.

Something like the below are tactical shot guns:

https://www.benellile.com/shotguns/m4-t ... ns?eid=228

https://www.benellile.com/shotguns/m2-t ... ns?eid=236

Much longer barrels, holds ore shells, and are lighter.

You really need to stay out of firearms and firearm aw discussions.  You are not knowledgable enough for them.

You should have bought a Benelli or Beretta.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

You care enough to stalk 2A supporters on this forum and question there desire to own particular weapons.  You pretend you are speaking of firearms and laws as if you are an expert but you know very little.

When it come to function and firepower those two weapons are exactly the same.  You you idiots ban one based on external appearance.

And you call me a **** moron.

You care enough to stalk 2A supporters on this forum and question there desire to own particular weapons

Illiterate @*TinySnowflake, please..

 

You have no knowledge on the topic of firearms.  You can't even fire a shotgun accurately.  You can't explain why one of those firearms is banned although they function the same.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

   

You would have to leave your safe space, SnowFlake.

You'd have to acknowledge your words, answer questions and quit sobbing. 

 

I kick your *** daily without asking you questions or to acknowledge your words.  I am not sobbing.  I am laughing at your daily feeble ankle biting attempts to play gotcha with me.
 

*Roshambo » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

****, that is not really a tactical shotgun.  It is a JTS AR 12 that hold only 4 rounds in the magazine.  And it is heavy,  It is mostly for hunting and fun.

Something like the below are tactical shot guns:

https://www.benellile.com/shotguns/m4-t ... ns?eid=228

https://www.benellile.com/shotguns/m2-t ... ns?eid=236

Much longer barrels, holds ore shells, and are lighter.

You really need to stay out of firearms and firearm aw discussions.  You are not knowledgable enough for them.

You should have bought a Benelli or Beretta.
 

 

But I didn't.

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

But I didn't.

You bought an Chinese shotgun