Liberal Forum

jerrab » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

you know this how?

I have ties to jamestown and the revolutionary war.

Then you should know it, too.

You want to know HOW he knows the white man won on this contintent?

Step out your door and count feathered heads,

There's your how, son. That's how he knows.
 

Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

And the sioux are from asia. 

And the french and english are allegedly from africa.

What is your point?

the only american dna is of native americans.

jerrab » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

you know this how?

I have ties to jamestown and the revolutionary war.

you were tied up in jameston?

who untied you?

Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Then you should know it, too.

You want to know HOW he knows the white man won on this contintent?

Step out your door and count feathered heads,

There's your how, kiddo. That's how he knows.

he was talking about his ancestors. as far as I know they came in the 1950;s on a boat or airplane.

jerrab » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

the only american dna is of native americans.

False.

That DNA is asian west of the big river, and european east of it.
 
The cherokee, algonquin, etc are stranded viking remnants.
 
 
 

jerrab » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

he was talking about his ancestors. as far as I know they came in the 1950;s on a boat or airplane.

Yes, he was talking about his anscestors. As far as you know, they were on the Mayflower. 

He was making a specific argument: We are now the indigenos. That's more a political argument than a DNA argument - but you responded with a false DNA argument. You said the native tribes have American DNA. They don't. They were invaders. From Asia in the west and from Europe in the east.

Cannonpointer » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

If only the democ rats had such a thing.

They don't. 

Oh, they have THINGS - be certain of that.

But not SUCH things as good candidates. They want to nut male children.

not all and Talarico is a mental case who got money from aipac
 

jerrab » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

not all and Talarico is a mental case who got money from aipac

Name a democ rat candidate who is running today and is frimly on record opposing child sexual mutilation and women being forced to compete with men. 
 

Cannonpointer » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

No, you werre not, And no, they did not. 

You were being fed canards.

Suck on Ja Wee Ahhh..

We'wha (Zuni, ~1849–1896): One of the most famous Lhamana (a traditional Zuni third-gender role combining both masculine and feminine qualities). We'wha was a celebrated craftsperson, spiritual leader, and cultural ambassador. In 1886, they traveled to Washington, D.C., met President Grover Cleveland, and were universally respected in Washington society. [1, 2, 3]

Eskimo women would self abort under stress of long winters with no food..  You know the rest..

Cannonpointer » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Name a democ rat candidate who is running today and is frimly on record opposing child sexual mutilation and women being forced to compete with men.

•  
• -----------------------------------------------------------------------
•  
• Marie Hurabiell: A Democratic Congressional candidate (CA-11) who has openly stated that she does not believe biological boys should compete in girls' sports. [1]
• Colin Allred: The Texas Democratic Senate nominee previously stated in a 2024 response to political ads that he does not support "boys in girls' sports

Cannonpointer » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Name a democ rat candidate who is running today and is frimly on record opposing child sexual mutilation and women being forced to compete with men.

===============
 Democrat Marie Hurabiell

Cannonpointer » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

Name a democ rat candidate who is running today and is frimly on record opposing child sexual mutilation and women being forced to compete with men.

Gov. Gavin Newsom: The California Governor has publicly bucked some in his party by calling transgender participation in girls' sports "deeply unfair" and arguing against the displacement of female athletes

Cannonpointer » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

Name a democ rat candidate who is running today and is frimly on record opposing child sexual mutilation and women being forced to compete with men.

---------------------------------------------
While the national Democratic platform largely supports the inclusion of trans-identifying individuals, internal polling shows significant division within the party's base. A New York Times/Ipsos survey revealed that 67% of Democratic-leaning respondents agree that biological males should not compete in women's sports

jerrab » Today, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:34 am

people are sick of the iran war, the cuts to schools, etc. people want a good candidate to run against trump's flunkies.

And Main Stream doesn't care..  It's amazing how they distract the masses to look at dumb crap.

CBS Snooz..   

JohnnyYou » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

And Main Stream doesn't care..  It's amazing how they distract the masses to look at dumb crap.

CBS Snooz..

it is amazing how dem candidates don't even try to win.

JohnnyYou » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

And Main Stream doesn't care..  It's amazing how they distract the masses to look at dumb crap.

CBS Snooz..

--------------------------------

While the national Democratic platform largely supports the inclusion of trans-identifying individuals, internal polling shows significant division within the party's base. A New York Times/Ipsos survey revealed that 67% of Democratic-leaning respondents agree that biological males should not compete in women's sports

JohnnyYou » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

Suck on Ja Wee Ahhh..

We'wha (Zuni, ~1849–1896): One of the most famous Lhamana (a traditional Zuni third-gender role combining both masculine and feminine qualities). We'wha was a celebrated craftsperson, spiritual leader, and cultural ambassador. In 1886, they traveled to Washington, D.C., met President Grover Cleveland, and were universally respected in Washington society. [1, 2, 3]

Okay, fruitcake. Let's meet AI with AI.

For starters, "universally respected" should be replaced with "garnered gawkers."

In the second pace, the term "Two-Spirit" (niizh manidoowag) was actually coined much later, in 1990, during an Indigenous LGBT conference in Winnipeg. This is a common practice on the left in general and in the LMNOPQR community in particular - exaggerating the past; using extreme outliers as questionable "evidence" for exaggerated theses.

You HAVE made the case that "third gender persons" existed in one tiny, isolated band whose language is shared by no other and whose population is limited to a single small pueblo today. You've not made the case why we should give a ****.

Let's consult AI again:

AI Overview

At their societal zenith prior to European contact, the Zuni population is estimated to have been around 4,000 to 6,000 members. At this time in the 16th century, they resided across several highly developed plaza-style pueblos (often historically referred to by the Spanish as the "Seven Cities of Cibola") along the Zuni River in New Mexico.

Today their numbers are half again that: 6 to 8 thousand persons occupy the zuni reservation. So CLEARLY, being the white man's pets has been a good thing for the zuni.

You've made your case on the thinnest technical margin without actually redeeming your stupidity. You've used a tiny outlier tribe with a dead language, and you've shown that there is SOME minuscule grain of truth to the leftist canard that injuns were famous for revering braves who rode side saddle and squatted to pee.

Why we should force women to retire from boxing or fight Mike Tyson is not elucidated by that desperate google-spew. But congrats on finding a single strand of a cobweb from which to dangle your deranged participle.

Perhaps you will tell us the most imprtant question this information generates: why we should give a single **** about a "nation" of 6,000 manifestly inbred people (do the math, think west virginia) revering trannies?

jerrab » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

•  
• -----------------------------------------------------------------------
•  
• Marie Hurabiell: A Democratic Congressional candidate (CA-11) who has openly stated that she does not believe biological boys should compete in girls' sports. [1]
• Colin Allred: The Texas Democratic Senate nominee previously stated in a 2024 response to political ads that he does not support "boys in girls' sports

So you have a democrat in california who will more likely face lynching than being sworn in, and you have a democrat in texas whose surname literally means comnist.

Well, your pervert party is off to a ROLLICKING start.

jerrab » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

--------------------------------

While the national Democratic platform largely supports the inclusion of trans-identifying individuals, internal polling shows significant division within the party's base. A New York Times/Ipsos survey revealed that 67% of Democratic-leaning respondents agree that biological males should not compete in women's sports

Folks are complaigning they are playing the game softly..  Mickie Sherril requested that they back off at Delaney Hall.

I get the strategy.  If Protests get out of hand.. which can easily be manipulated by bad actors, the civil unrest is the bingo card to declaring martial law and delaying the election.

We are in a precarious position.  We damn sure should do something, and anything we do can and will be used against us.

Cannonpointer » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Okay, fruitcake. Let's meet AI with AI.

For starters, "universally respected" should be replaced with "garnered gawkers."

In the second pace, the term "Two-Spirit" (niizh manidoowag) was actually coined much later, in 1990, during an Indigenous LGBT conference in Winnipeg. This is a common practice on the left in general and in the LMNOPQR community in particular - exaggerating the past; using extreme outliers as questionable "evidence" for exaggerated theses.

You HAVE made the case that "third gender persons" existed in one tiny, isolated band whose language is shared by no other and whose population is limited to a single small pueblo today. You've not made the case why we should give a ****.

Let's consult AI again:

Today their numbers are half again that: 6 to 8 thousand persons occupy the zuni reservation. So CLEARLY, being the white man's pets has been a good thing for the zuni.

You've made your case on the thinnest technical margin without actually redeeming your stupidity. You've used a tiny outlier tribe with a dead language, and you've shown that there is SOME minuscule grain of truth to the leftist canard that injuns were famous for revering braves who rode side saddle and squatted to pee.

Why we should force women to retire from boxing or fight Mike Tyson is not elucidated by that desperate google-spew. But congrats on finding a single strand of a cobweb from which to dangle your deranged participle.

Perhaps you will tell us the most imprtant question this information generates: why we should give a single **** about a "nation" of 6,000 manifestly inbred people (do the math, think west virginia) revering trannies?

Fair enough..  But I think your AI is into his fourth full GROK already today...

The battle of the AI's is recognized..    It could take us from the River to a Sea Grave..