I have posted sufficient proof to confirm my assertion.
You mean the bullet.
JohnnyYou » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I think we need to have intervention.. @Vegas 's @Blackvegetable Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is not healthy. He said this has been going on for 9 years?
"That's not an eggplant... It's an Obelisk!"
Define "stalking"Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
I have been humiliating him for 9 years. In return, he has stalked me for the same amount of time. How many people do you know would spend hours and hours per day digging through a member's profile to find old posts? He does this with @Huey and probably a few others also. He has folders with our names on them saved on his computer.
Believe me when I tell you that he needs the intervention. I am just here to dehumanize him for his disorder.
Ok Cannon and Deezer, I see you are playing hardball here. Cannon , I can't get Rebel to blow you. What else can I offer? Deezer, you haven't named your price yet. What do you wish for?Vegas » 03 Jun 2026, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑
The challenge: Have Cannon or Deezer randomly choose a page from each of our OP histories. Then compare whose OPs contain more of his own original thoughts, arguments, and analysis.
Posting articles is fine. That is not the issue. The issue is whether the person posting actually adds thoughtful commentary of his own, or whether the OP is mostly just an article followed by the usual “Trump bad / MAGA dumb” routine, a flood of questions for everyone else, and no real attempt to answer anything, defend a position, or take ownership of his own OP.
The original challenge was that the loser takes a month off. Since Veghead will probably continue treating this challenge like garlic to a vampire, I am asking the mods if they would be willing to do it just for fun.No official punishment. Just a random sample and a neutral comparison.
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove what would you want from me in return for your time?Donation to the site? Public thank-you? Temporary posting break?
I’d offer not to gloat afterward, but let’s keep this realistic.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2026, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ We have submitted samples to AI for neutral judgment.
It didn't go well for you.
I don't need to check jack ****. He never posts original thoughts. He posts the thoughts of other men - exclusively.Vegas » Today, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Ok Cannon and Deezer, I see you are playing hardball here. Cannon , I can't get Rebel to blow you. What else can I offer? Deezer, you haven't named your price yet. What do you wish for?
The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't need to check jack ****. He never posts original thoughts. He posts the thoughts of other men - exclusively.
He's a worm.
nothing to disprove as no additional asserted collaborating photos have been posted…Blackvegetable » 04 Jun 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ I have posted sufficient proof to confirm my assertion.
You haven't provided squat...

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The caption wasn't enough.
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't need to check jack ****. He never posts original thoughts. He posts the thoughts of other men - exclusively.
He's a worm.