January 6th FIASCO has now been pretty much CONFIRMED to have been Democrat Party and Deep State "Virtual Assassination" attempt on Donald Trump... where:Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2026, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ At least 97 of the more than 1,500 individuals granted clemency by President Trump for their roles in the January 6 Capitol attack have been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of crimes separate from Jan. 6 since their participation in the Jan. 6 riot.
A Lawfare study reveals that almost one in 16 insurrectionists subject to the president’s clemency order has been arrested for and charged with—and in the vast majority of cases convicted of—other crimes, at least some of which were actively enabled by the clemency actions.
The alleged crimes by Jan. 6 defendants since Jan. 6, 2021, run the gamut from relatively low-grade offenses like property damage, possession of drug paraphernalia, and trespassing to serious felonies like grand larceny, stalking, planning to assassinate law enforcement officials and prominent politicians, and defrauding government agencies. One Jan. 6 pardonee was convicted in February 2026 of child molestation and sentenced to life in prison. Another was convicted in 2025 of reckless homicide.
At least 14, meanwhile, have been charged with sex crimes or crimes related to child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and at least six have faced domestic violence charges. Others have faced charges for physical assaults, illegal firearms possession, or other violent crimes. At least 20 have been charged with driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs or public intoxication. Perhaps most strikingly, five recipients of presidential clemency were arrested in connection with conduct that occurred at least in part subsequent to Trump’s freeing them from prison—meaning that Trump’s clemency order on the first day of his second term may have actively facilitated criminal conduct.
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/th ... er-charges
In my opinion, this is not good.
Stick to the facts:Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑There's that word again.Huey » 06 Jun 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Although a few were charged with seditious conspiracy NO ONE was charged with the specific charge of insurrection.
No **** dudette. Welcome to the party. Some of us agreed that pardons/clemency for the violent rioters was wrong.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2026, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ At least 97 of the more than 1,500 individuals granted clemency by President Trump for their roles in the January 6 Capitol attack have been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of crimes separate from Jan. 6 since their participation in the Jan. 6 riot.
A Lawfare study reveals that almost one in 16 insurrectionists subject to the president’s clemency order has been arrested for and charged with—and in the vast majority of cases convicted of—other crimes, at least some of which were actively enabled by the clemency actions.
The alleged crimes by Jan. 6 defendants since Jan. 6, 2021, run the gamut from relatively low-grade offenses like property damage, possession of drug paraphernalia, and trespassing to serious felonies like grand larceny, stalking, planning to assassinate law enforcement officials and prominent politicians, and defrauding government agencies. One Jan. 6 pardonee was convicted in February 2026 of child molestation and sentenced to life in prison. Another was convicted in 2025 of reckless homicide.
At least 14, meanwhile, have been charged with sex crimes or crimes related to child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and at least six have faced domestic violence charges. Others have faced charges for physical assaults, illegal firearms possession, or other violent crimes. At least 20 have been charged with driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs or public intoxication. Perhaps most strikingly, five recipients of presidential clemency were arrested in connection with conduct that occurred at least in part subsequent to Trump’s freeing them from prison—meaning that Trump’s clemency order on the first day of his second term may have actively facilitated criminal conduct.
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/th ... er-charges
In my opinion, this is not good.
ConservativeWave » 06 Jun 2026, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ January 6th FIASCO has now been pretty much CONFIRMED to have been Democrat Party and Deep State "Virtual Assassination" attempt on Donald Trump... where:
You were unclear on my stand?Huey » 06 Jun 2026, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No **** dudette. Welcome to the party. Some of us agreed that pardons/clemency for the violent rioters was wrong.
Way to finally take a **** stand.
"Finally"Huey » 06 Jun 2026, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No **** dudette. Welcome to the party. Some of us agreed that pardons/clemency for the violent rioters was wrong.
Way to finally take a **** stand.
Huey » 06 Jun 2026, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No **** dudette. Welcome to the party. Some of us agreed that pardons/clemency for the violent rioters was wrong.
Way to finally take a **** stand.
The FACTS SHOW that the FBI was VERY involved in the Jan 6th demonstrations... and some TURNED it into a riot... So, IS THAT that just my OPINION?
https://i.postimg.cc/7ZQc6xwg/doit.jpg
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2026, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑"Finally"Huey » 06 Jun 2026, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No **** dudette. Welcome to the party. Some of us agreed that pardons/clemency for the violent rioters was wrong.
Way to finally take a **** stand.
viewtopic.php?p=1698001#p1698001
What a **** idiot.
Stop relying.Huey » 07 Jun 2026, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ We are talking about the pardons, idiot. You agreed with me concerning what should have been done to those scaling the steps and walls. And t took you 6 **** months to come up with that stand, Puss.
:rofl:You agreed with me concerning what should have been done to those scaling the steps and walls.
Are you suggesting I didn't "take a stand" on what should have been done to the MAGAts on Jan 6th, until 6 months later?Huey » 07 Jun 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ It didn't take me 6 months to take that stand after Jan 6, PS.
Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑Are you suggesting I didn't "take a stand" on what should have been done to the MAGAts on Jan 6th, until 6 months later?Huey » 07 Jun 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ It didn't take me 6 months to take that stand after Jan 6, PS.
No...you're a **** idiot...
And 6 years later you still think it was a Gilligan's Island three hour tour.Huey » 07 Jun 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ It didn't take me 6 months to take that stand after Jan 6, PS.
JohnnyYou » 07 Jun 2026, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ And 6 years later you still think it was a Gilligan's Island three hour tour.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom #painfullyslowmentalmidgetBlackvegetable » 06 Jun 2026, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ I've been too noncommittal.....
People have a right to know where I stand.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom First time for everything…*Roshambo » 06 Jun 2026, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, you "took a stand"
The crucial aspect was it was your thoughts. Some individuals merely copy and paste, similar to hurling feces at a wall, to see if it sticks.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom