Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

And right on cue Run Off to Canada (ROTC) is mocking those who volunteered.

Mark Kelly is lucky he did not get courtmartialed.

Mark Kelly is lucky he did not get courtmartialed. 

Sure...

Explain the "lucky" part.

 

Are you answering questions today, Psycho Stalker?

OFFICIAL STATEMENT: The Department of War has received serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.). In accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 688, and other applicable regulations, a thorough review of these allegations has been initiated to determine further actions, which may include recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures. This matter will be handled in compliance with military law, ensuring due process and impartiality. Further official comments will be limited, to preserve the integrity of the proceedings. The Department of War reminds all individuals that military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces. Any violations will be addressed through appropriate legal channels. All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful. A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order.

Now you explain what made the orders in question illegal.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Notice I addressed the topic.  Also notice, I did not not edit any posts, Psycho Stalker.

Post your opening remark.

I addressed the topic

And now you're gonna run from it.

 

This isn't about me, you or MR-7 service.  This is about Mark Kelly, ROTC.  Start a thread, Psycho Troll.

MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Funny how Slack Jaw keeps acting like Kelly is some flawless oracle. Don’t worry...the universe has a way of handing out ‘Bolton‑style reality checks’ to people who posture a little too hard. Everybody gets their day eventually.

Once Trump's term concludes, it will be "his turn next"
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

This isn't about me, you or MR-7 service.  This is about Mark Kelly, ROTC.  Start a thread, Psycho Troll.

I hope there are reeducation camps for MAGAts someday.  Trump is going to run off on you  man.  Exile to Albania.
 

JohnnyYou » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Cucumber water -   I have not had it in a long time.

Thanks for the health encouragement.  I gotta stop living like I am 17.

It IS transformative...

Been seeing this guy doing reps, squatting 365 lbs....he's about 5' 7"...stocky but not chiseled....

standing right next to him at a station we start talking....he tells me that 7 years ago he was 80 lbs. heavier - described a gut hanging down to his knees - at the end of a **** marriage...

His equanimity is written all over his face...all smiles, all the time...
 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

This isn't about me, you or MR-7 service.  This is about Mark Kelly, ROTC.  Start a thread, Psycho Troll.

Then don't make it about you, @*TinyVictim


 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

It IS transformative...

Been seeing this guy doing reps, squatting 365 lbs....he's about 5' 7"...stocky but not chiseled....

standing right next to him at a station we start talking....he tells me that 7 years ago he was 80 lbs. heavier - described a gut hanging down to his knees - at the end of a **** marriage...

His equanimity is written all over his face...all smiles, all the time...

We get it... you want to suck his dick.

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Are you answering questions today, Psycho Stalker?

OFFICIAL STATEMENT: The Department of War has received serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.). In accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 688, and other applicable regulations, a thorough review of these allegations has been initiated to determine further actions, which may include recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures. This matter will be handled in compliance with military law, ensuring due process and impartiality. Further official comments will be limited, to preserve the integrity of the proceedings. The Department of War reminds all individuals that military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces. Any violations will be addressed through appropriate legal channels. All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful. A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order.

Now you explain what made the orders in question illegal.

You are stalking me


That doesn't address the question asked...
 

 ̶*̶R̶o̶s̶h̶a̶m̶b̶o̶
̶
̶O̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶T̶r̶u̶m̶p̶'̶s̶ ̶t̶e̶r̶m̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶c̶l̶u̶d̶e̶s̶,̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶w̶i̶l̶l̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶"̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶t̶u̶r̶n̶ ̶n̶e̶x̶t̶"̶

Rosh-e-Poo, ‘his turn next’ is a fine example of your stupidity. Presidential immunity exists. Executive protections exist. Bolton’s situation doesn’t erase the Constitution. You’re quoting your little feelings. not law. 
 

JohnnyYou » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

I hope there are reeducation camps for MAGAts someday.  Trump is going to run off on you  man.  Exile to Albania.

I didn't vote for him.  Nice try.

FJB » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

We get it... you want to suck his dick.

MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Rosh-e-Poo, ‘his turn next’ is a fine example of your stupidity. Presidential immunity exists. Executive protections exist. Bolton’s situation doesn’t erase the Constitution. You’re quoting your little feelings. not law.

No you dumb mother ****.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102372


 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Are you answering questions today, Psycho Stalker?

OFFICIAL STATEMENT: The Department of War has received serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.). In accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 688, and other applicable regulations, a thorough review of these allegations has been initiated to determine further actions, which may include recall to active duty for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures. This matter will be handled in compliance with military law, ensuring due process and impartiality. Further official comments will be limited, to preserve the integrity of the proceedings. The Department of War reminds all individuals that military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces. Any violations will be addressed through appropriate legal channels. All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful. A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order.

Now you explain what made the orders in question illegal.

You are stalking me


That doesn't address the question asked...
 

 

Yes it does.  YOU Have not addressed the question asked of you.  You lose, PS.

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I didn't vote for him.  Nice try.

Why would you not vote for one you called "great" and "2ndBesty"?

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Yes it does.  

Where's the "luck" part?

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

I didn't vote for him.  Nice try.

Why would you not vote for one you called "great" and "2ndBesty"?

 

That answer can be found in numerous places.  Tell you what, when you can't find I pledge to answer YOUR questions if YOU pledge to answer mine in a one for one basis.  Balls in court, RUNNY!

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Yes it does.  

Where's the "luck" part?

 

 

 ̶*̶R̶o̶s̶h̶a̶m̶b̶o̶
̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶d̶u̶m̶b̶ ̶m̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶f̶u̶c̶k̶e̶r̶.̶
̶
̶h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶:̶/̶/̶l̶i̶b̶e̶r̶a̶l̶f̶o̶r̶u̶m̶.̶n̶e̶t̶/̶v̶i̶e̶w̶t̶o̶p̶i̶c̶.̶p̶h̶p̶?̶f̶=̶3̶&̶t̶=̶1̶0̶2̶3̶7̶2̶

Rosh-e-Poo, linking a Facebook rant doesn’t "magically erase constitutional law". Presidents operate under executive immunity, statutory protections, and layers of legal review that don’t vanish because a Slack Jaw like you found a spicy post. Bolton’s getting dragged because he lied. That’s how accountability works. Kelly will get his turn as he has earned it...but your Facebook link is just an opinion, and nothing else. TRUMP owns all democrats...all liberals...and all the COWARDLY 3RD PARTY voters.                  
 
 
 

*Roshambo » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Once Trump's term concludes, it will be "his turn next"

  And hegseth's.
I can't wait to see him weeping about how he was only following orders.

 

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

That answer can be found in numerous places.  Tell you what, when you can't find I pledge to answer YOUR questions if YOU pledge to answer mine in a one for one basis.  Balls in court, RUNNY!

If I decline to answer, it's back in YOUR court, right?

I pledge to answer YOUR questions

You just provided more evidence why that pledge is worthless. 

 

MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Rosh-e-Poo, linking a Facebook rant doesn’t "magically erase constitutional law". Presidents operate under executive immunity, statutory protections, and layers of legal review that don’t vanish because a Slack Jaw like you found a spicy post. Bolton’s getting dragged because he lied. That’s how accountability works. Kelly will get his turn as he has earned it...but your Facebook link is just an opinion, and nothing else. TRUMP owns all democrats...all liberals...and all the COWARDLY 3RD PARTY voters.                

And where are you learning about the law?